• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Top US nuclear commander: Russia is 'the only existential threat to the country right now'

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
94,343
Reaction score
82,729
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Top US nuclear commander: Russia is 'the only existential threat to the country right now'


By Amanda Macias
February 28, 2018

200x133_7f100da685954dd7838d184faab758d9.jpg


While the special counsel's investigation tries to determine whether Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election, America's top nuclear commander described the nation as a paramount threat to the United States. "Russia is the most significant threat just because they pose the only existential threat to the country right now. So we have to look at that from that perspective," the commander of U.S. Strategic Command, or STRATCOM, Air Force Gen. John Hyten said during the Association of the United States Army's Air and Missile Defense conference Wednesday. Hyten noted that Russia, China and North Korea each assert distinct threats at varying tempos and yet, the U.S. is responsible for dealing with all of them at the same time. "It's not one-size-fits-all and we keep as a nation trying to make it one-size-fits-all and it doesn't work that way," Hyten said of countering threats posed by America's three top adversaries. What's more, the Department of Defense requested a budget of $686 billion, one of the largest in U.S. history, with an emphasis on offsetting emerging threats from Russia and China.

President Donald Trump, meanwhile, has spoken about the need to create a new nuclear arsenal. "We're modernizing and creating a brand-new nuclear force. And frankly we have to do it because others are doing it," he said earlier this month. "The Korean problem is different than the China problem is different than the Russia problem. Everything we do with respect to Korea impacts China. Everything we do with China impacts Russia. Everything we do with Russia impacts everybody else," Hyten said. Hyten also weighed in on the threat of a potential war with North Korea. "Anyone that wears a uniform does not want war. Goodness knows you don't want a war on that peninsula," he said. "If you've been there you know you don't want to go down that path." Hyten also said that China, Pyongyang's closest ally, poses unique threats to the U.S. as the nation's development in space systems and war-fighting capabilities outpace Russia and North Korea.

The US, Russia, and China are all in the final stages of developing hypersonic (5+ m/s) cruise missiles which will be virtually impossible to intercept. Putin claimed yesterday that a Russian nuclear hypersonic cruise missile is already a reality.
 
Top US nuclear commander: Russia is 'the only existential threat to the country right now'




The US, Russia, and China are all in the final stages of developing hypersonic (5+ m/s) cruise missiles which will be virtually impossible to intercept. Putin claimed yesterday that a Russian nuclear hypersonic cruise missile is already a reality.

So what happened in four years where the idea of Russia being our number one geopolitical foe went from being the butt of a joke about "the '80s calling and wanting its foreign policy back" to "ZOMG! The Russians are coming! The Russians are coming!"?

Really, chart the change.
 
They've always been a existential threat, they currently have over 4000 thermonuclear warheads and the capacity to deliver those warheads

OF-COURSE they're a existential threat

They were our only existential threat back when Obama was cutting deals with Putin over the Syrian crisis

Deals that paved the way for Russia's direct intervention in the Middle East and the building of a Russian, Assad regime and Iranian alliance that threatens Isrsel and threatens to destabilize a already unstable ME.

They were our only existential threat when the Obama administration approved the sale of Uranium One that gave Putin control over 1/5 of US uranium

They were our only existential threat during Hillary's Russian reset button gaffe. They were our only existential threat when months prior they invaded Georgia

I mean give me a ****ing break. Liberals dont have a leg to stand on when it comes to commenting on foreign policy, let alone critiquing Trumps foreign policy decisions
 
Thanks, Hillary.
 
They've always been a existential threat, they currently have over 4000 thermonuclear warheads and the capacity to deliver those warheads

OF-COURSE they're a existential threat

They were our only existential threat back when Obama was cutting deals with Putin over the Syrian crisis

Deals that paved the way for Russia's direct intervention in the Middle East and the building of a Russian, Assad regime and Iranian alliance that threatens Isrsel and threatens to destabilize a already unstable ME.

They were our only existential threat when the Obama administration approved the sale of Uranium One that gave Putin control over 1/5 of US uranium

They were our only existential threat during Hillary's Russian reset button gaffe. They were our only existential threat when months prior they invaded Georgia

I mean give me a ****ing break. Liberals dont have a leg to stand on when it comes to commenting on foreign policy, let alone critiquing Trumps foreign policy decisions

The nightmare I have is if China, NoKo, and Iran got together and wondered "What would the world be like without the USA?" And decided, "Let's find out".

Russia would sit it out because all they really want is Europe.
 
I don't see how this changes the equation in the large scheme of things. Yesterday, if there had be a full nuclear exchange, we'd all be dead. Tomorrow with these new hyper-super-mega-sonic weapons, if there's a full nuclear exchange we'll all be dead.

I've spent my whole life knowing if there's a nuclear exchange we'll all be dead. I don't feel more nervous than I did before I read the story.
 
So what happened in four years where the idea of Russia being our number one geopolitical foe went from being the butt of a joke about "the '80s calling and wanting its foreign policy back" to "ZOMG! The Russians are coming! The Russians are coming!"?

Really, chart the change.


Pentagon in 2015 ended more than 20 years of strategic ambiguity by putting Russia behind door number one, China behind door number two and Iran behind door number three, with NK as the most immediate concern.

Trump has been kissing Russia's ass since he descended the escalator at Faulty Tower to the present with no change foreseeable or expected.
 
Somewhere Mitt Romney is laughing his ass off.
 
Pentagon in 2015 ended more than 20 years of strategic ambiguity by putting Russia behind door number one, China behind door number two and Iran behind door number three, with NK as the most immediate concern.

Trump has been kissing Russia's ass since he descended the escalator at Faulty Tower to the present with no change foreseeable or expected.

The Lefts talking point that Trump is pro-Russia and has been kissing Putins asa since day one is markedly partisan and selective, to the point of absurdity.

I suppose you have to consider the source and also consider the sophistication or lack thereof of the target audience

If anyone kissed Putins ass it was Obama. His administration's OK of the sale of Uranium One which gave Putin control over 1/5 of our uranium and cut deals with Putin that paved the way for direct Russian intervention into the ME and a alliance between Russia, Assads regime and the Iranians that currently threaten the stability of the ME and Israel, our ally

If Russia is more of a threat now its due to numerous horrible Foreign policy missteps that occured under the Obama administration
 
Top US nuclear commander: Russia is 'the only existential threat to the country right now'




The US, Russia, and China are all in the final stages of developing hypersonic (5+ m/s) cruise missiles which will be virtually impossible to intercept. Putin claimed yesterday that a Russian nuclear hypersonic cruise missile is already a reality.

Well, here's the way I look at this ****:
We had a POTUS back in 2001 that decided (he was 'the decider' after all) that a 'war on terror' would be of great benefit after he ('the decider') allowed 9/11.
Back then all of the PNAC idiots were towing the same Reaganesque bull**** line that the cold war was over and that the US had won.
Well, the cold war was never over, GW 'The Decider' Bush destabilized the entire Middle East with his ****ty wars of choice, and the rest is history.
Thanks GW, you rotten ****ing POS apple ................... thanks for taking your eye off the REAL threat to the West & to the US .......... you prick ..........
 
The Lefts talking point that Trump is pro-Russia and has been kissing Putins asa since day one is markedly partisan and selective, to the point of absurdity.

I suppose you have to consider the source and also consider the sophistication or lack thereof of the target audience

If anyone kissed Putins ass it was Obama. His administration's OK of the sale of Uranium One which gave Putin control over 1/5 of our uranium and cut deals with Putin that paved the way for direct Russian intervention into the ME and a alliance between Russia, Assads regime and the Iranians that currently threaten the stability of the ME and Israel, our ally

If Russia is more of a threat now its due to numerous horrible Foreign policy missteps that occured under the Obama administration


GW looked Putin in the eyes and Bush saw Putin's soul.

The whole of your post is rightwhinge politics and nothing but. I cited the Pentagon in my post and I stand by it.
 
GW looked Putin in the eyes and Bush saw Putin's soul.

The whole of your post is rightwhinge politics and nothing but. I cited the Pentagon in my post and I stand by it.

Over the last year this forum has turned into a veritable dumpster filled with Left wing partisan idiocy and dumbass TDS threads, and this one is no exeption

Its why I dont post as much as I used to and spare me the Bush nonsense.

The TRUTH is Russia's global influence and power grew substantially under Obama and much of that had to do with Obama's disastrous and fectless foreign policy
The fact that the left is now qualifying truth as " right wing politics and nothing else " just highlights the cult like mentality thats so pervasive among Trump haters and Democrats in general

The TRUTH is Russia is now allied with Assad and Iran. Its a alliance that threatens the stability of a already unstable region and our ME allies and you can that Obama for making it a reality

The TRUTH is Putin now owns the rights to 1/5 of our uranium and you can thank Obama for making that happen
 
Last edited:
Over the last year this forum has turned into a veritable dumpster filled with Left wing partisan idiocy and dumbass TDS threads, and this one is no exeption

Its why I dont post as much as I used to and spare me the Bush nonsense.

The TRUTH is Russia's global influence and power grew substantially under Obama and much of that had to do with Obama's disastrous and fectless foreign policy
The fact that the left is now qualifying truth as " right wing politics and nothing else " just highlights the cult like mentality thats so pervasive among Trump haters and Democrats in general

The TRUTH is Russia is now allied with Assad and Iran. Its a alliance that threatens the stability of a already unstable region and our ME allies and you can that Obama for making it a reality

The TRUTH is Putin now owns the rights to 1/5 of our uranium and you can thank Obama for making that happen


United States possesses the significant gold reserves owned by 60 sovereign governments. The take is in vaults 80 feet down on bedrock in the NY Fed building, since WW 2. Germany recently requested some back and we told 'em it would take a while. It's still a while. Putin's uranium is possessed by the United States and is sold only in the USA. And its is 1/10 of uranium mined in USA, not one fifth. Possession is 9/10ths of the law or didn't you know over there on the far out rightwhinge.

Russia is a gas station to China and to Europe and nothing more than that in its influence and its economy. The sanctions are killing 'em over there where the quality of life sucks to begin with. Trump wants or needs to help out Putin for whatever reason that is no good whatsoever. The Trump Fanboyz have no arguments to defend Trump being subservient to Putin so it's long been predicable the threads are polluted by rightwingers saying Hillary and Obama again and again. The bottom line is that youse guyz are the first mass of sore winners in the history of American elections. An angry mob bearing torches.
 
They've always been a existential threat, they currently have over 4000 thermonuclear warheads and the capacity to deliver those warheads

OF-COURSE they're a existential threat

They have about 1700, which is a much as the US has. If you add the nukes that are to be retired/dismantled then both nations have around 7000.

They were our only existential threat back when Obama was cutting deals with Putin over the Syrian crisis

No they were not. The GOP, your people, we claiming muslims, China and others were an existential threat.

Deals that paved the way for Russia's direct intervention in the Middle East and the building of a Russian, Assad regime and Iranian alliance that threatens Isrsel and threatens to destabilize a already unstable ME.

LOL you think Syria started the destabilization of the ME? HAHAHAHA And the only threat to Israel, is Israel it self.

They were our only existential threat when the Obama administration approved the sale of Uranium One that gave Putin control over 1/5 of US uranium

They dont control ****. They might own a small portion of the uranium production in the US, but they cant export it to Russia or anywhere else without permission of the US government. On top of that, any conflict and that product will be instantly nationalized.

They were our only existential threat during Hillary's Russian reset button gaffe. They were our only existential threat when months prior they invaded Georgia

Yea, you would not have done something if suddenly Russia set up shop in say Northern Mexico eh?

I mean give me a ****ing break. Liberals dont have a leg to stand on when it comes to commenting on foreign policy, let alone critiquing Trumps foreign policy decisions

Its been GOP neo con politics bull**** for decades, regardless of who was in power. Trump is only making it worse by becoming more extreme and walking straight into your "enemies" hands.
 
Pentagon is consistent and has been consistent for a long time....


Gen. Milley: Russia No.1 threat to US

November 9, 2015

WASHINGTON (Army News Service, Nov. 4, 2015) -- Russia should be considered the No. 1 threat to the United States for two reasons, its capability and its intent, said Army Chief of Staff Gen. Mark A. Milley.

"In terms of capability, Russia is the only country on earth that has the capability to destroy the United States of America," Milley said here at the Defense One Summit. "It's an existential threat by definition because of their nuclear capabilities. Other countries have nuclear weapons, but none as many as Russia and none have the capability to literally destroy the United States."

"The situation with Russia in my mind is serious and growing more serious," he said. "I see Russia as aggressive, not just assertive. They attacked Georgia; they illegally seized Crimea; they have attacked Ukraine… all those countries were free and independent and have been sovereign nations now for a quarter century, since the fall of the Berlin Wall.

"I would say, Russia's recent behavior is adversarial to the interest of the United States," Milley said, adding that the United States and its allies have to approach Russia with a strength and balance approach. "So, we want on the one hand to maintain strength in order to deter further Russian aggression and we need to stand firm where that aggression manifests itself, hence things like sanctions and what NATO is doing right now," he said.


https://www.army.mil/article/158386/milley_russia_no1_threat_to_us


So it is safe to say Trump trying to sell the U.S. out on Russian sanctions does not sit well with the Pentagon. Unless Trump has some other approach to checking Putin, which Trump does not have. Trump as we know does nothing about Russian cyber attacks against the United States in the United States. Trump ignores 'em completely.




Former senator Sam Nunn was chairman of the armed services committee and has an expertise in nuclear issues of war and peace....


Trump, Russia and Nuclear Weapons - Sam Nunn Interview with Atlanta Public Radio


First of all, we have fundamentally different interests than Russia in several parts of the world, and we've got to understand that. We certainly don't have the same concept of rule of law or democracy as Russia, and we've got to understand that.

But we've also got to understand that given the nuclear arsenals and the fact that we can destroy each other while we're having lunch, that we have an existential interest with Russia in basically preserving our nation. So we've got to communicate. And the more the tensions go up, the more we need to communicate. I would start with military to military, because the military on both sides are pretty darn professional and I've seen them be able to have a discussion when the political side was so poisoned and so much distrust there wasn't any way to have a discussion.

And so here is where we have to have a balance. We have to be able to disagree firmly in some areas. We have to make sure that we have the right kind of deterrence and defenses in NATO to protect Article 5 commitments. But we also have to talk to the Russians. And we have to basically understand in both countries that we are doomed to work together or we are doomed to have some pretty serious catastrophes.


Trump, Russia and Nuclear Weapons - Sam Nunn Interview with Atlanta Public Radio | Analysis | NTI


Trump is ignoring the fact Russia exists except to have a record over the past few years of soliciting Putin and chumming up with Russians and their operatives Wikileaks. Trump has no deals going on, no negotiations, no leadership. Trump is instead focused on busting up Nato while he menaces everyone with fire and fury against NK. The guy is as stable and subtle as a jackhammer.
 
Over the last year this forum has turned into a veritable dumpster filled with Left wing partisan idiocy and dumbass TDS threads, and this one is no exeption

Its why I dont post as much as I used to and spare me the Bush nonsense.

The TRUTH is Russia's global influence and power grew substantially under Obama and much of that had to do with Obama's disastrous and fectless foreign policy
The fact that the left is now qualifying truth as " right wing politics and nothing else " just highlights the cult like mentality thats so pervasive among Trump haters and Democrats in general

The TRUTH is Russia is now allied with Assad and Iran. Its a alliance that threatens the stability of a already unstable region and our ME allies and you can that Obama for making it a reality

The TRUTH is Putin now owns the rights to 1/5 of our uranium and you can thank Obama for making that happen

1. How we got here isn't as important as we are where we are. What are we doing about it? Really, nothing. Its the current administration that is responsible for leading the US in the correct direction. In that regard, they are failing miserably.

2. An otherwise decent indictment of how we got to where we are is torpedoed by your own ignorance about Uranium One. UO is a CANADIAN company with US assets. They have SOME uranium interests in the US, but the US government continues to have control on how they are used and where they are shipped. UO, the company, is now owned by a Russian company, but the uranium remains in the US. This is similar to ITT owning copper mines in Chile in the 1970's. When Chile decided ITT must go..... well, as they say, the rest is history (such as ITT holdings in Chile).
 

from your link....

" The original 20 percent figure comes from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, one of the agencies that approved the deal in 2010. It stated that as of 2010, the licenses “represent approximately 20 percent of the currently licensed uranium in-situ recovery production capacity” in the United States. ":
 
They have about 1700, which is a much as the US has. If you add the nukes that are to be retired/dismantled then both nations have around 7000.

WarheadsGraphic_180118_1_0.jpg

https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/Nuclearweaponswhohaswhat


No they were not. The GOP, your people, we claiming muslims, China and others were an existential threat.

Mitt Romney on Russia....




LOL you think Syria started the destabilization of the ME? HAHAHAHA And the only threat to Israel, is Israel it self.

:lamo No, A Russia, Assad regime, Iranian alliance is a stabilizing force....:roll:



They dont control ****. They might own a small portion of the uranium production in the US, but they cant export it to Russia or anywhere else without permission of the US government. On top of that, any conflict and that product will be instantly nationalized.

Uranium WAS exported out of the US and into Europe after Rusakom purchased Uranium One. Would it kill you to inform yourself ?

Uranium One deal led to some exports to Europe, memos show | TheHill


Yea, you would not have done something if suddenly Russia set up shop in say Northern Mexico eh?

????


Its been GOP neo con politics bull**** for decades, regardless of who was in power. Trump is only making it worse by becoming more extreme and walking straight into your "enemies" hands.

Lol ! Just wow
 
The tables have turned decidedly so we see now that all the nothingburgers are on the other guy's plate....



The Pinocchio Test


The 20 percent figure has long been in wide circulation. As we noted, the Fact Checker recently used it, though with caveats. But we should have looked at the actual production data and asked the NRC for an updated estimate of production capacity. Clearly, the number is woefully out of date.

Given that Uranium One’s production is only 2 percent of an already small total U.S. production — not 20 percent — the overwrought claims that Clinton “gave away” 20 percent of the U.S. nuclear supply or that Russia controls that much U.S. uranium are simply absurd.


Four Pinocchios

pinocchio_4.jpg


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ercent-of-our-uranium/?utm_term=.73316590f7ca



Unwraping The Whopper..
..


The Facts on Uranium One

By Eugene Kiely

Posted on October 26, 2017 | Updated on November 1, 2017

Update, Nov. 1: This story has been updated to say that NRC now estimates that Uranium One’s mining operations account for about 10 percent of in-situ recovery production capacity in the U.S. That’s half of what it was in 2010, because more in-situ recovery mining operators have been licensed since 2010.

We also added that Uranium One is responsible for no more than 5.9 percent of domestic production, according to a September 2017 report by the U.S. International Trade Commission.


https://www.factcheck.org/2017/10/facts-uranium-one/
 
Back
Top Bottom