- Joined
- Oct 21, 2015
- Messages
- 53,813
- Reaction score
- 10,864
- Location
- Kentucky
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Conservative
Re: Trump tweets on lives 'being shattered by ... a mere allegation'
We are talking about several different mass shootings, not just one. In any event, as far as the Vegas incident goes, the left is being extremely naive. This Vegas guy was basically intent on committing mass murder, AKA terrorism. Now let's assume that he couldn't have bought any guns or bullets at all, not even one. Since he was intent on committing mass murder he could have:
1. Made several pressure cooker bombs and planted them in the very same area (like the Boston Marathon, for example) and killed many people.
2. This guy was a pilot. He could have very easily rented a plane and flew right into the same crowd, killing even more than he did with the guns.
Would that have made you felt better, that he didn't commit mass murder with guns, that he used another method? He was going to kill all of these people one way or another. Just because his weapon of choice happened to be a gun (that let's assume he couldn't have done with gun control legislation) you think all of these people would still be alive? Like I said, the left are very naive. They can't think outside of their naive partisan boxes.
Yeah sure....Anybody should be able to acquire dozens of "ASSAULT" Rifles for self defense....BULL****
We are talking about several different mass shootings, not just one. In any event, as far as the Vegas incident goes, the left is being extremely naive. This Vegas guy was basically intent on committing mass murder, AKA terrorism. Now let's assume that he couldn't have bought any guns or bullets at all, not even one. Since he was intent on committing mass murder he could have:
1. Made several pressure cooker bombs and planted them in the very same area (like the Boston Marathon, for example) and killed many people.
2. This guy was a pilot. He could have very easily rented a plane and flew right into the same crowd, killing even more than he did with the guns.
Would that have made you felt better, that he didn't commit mass murder with guns, that he used another method? He was going to kill all of these people one way or another. Just because his weapon of choice happened to be a gun (that let's assume he couldn't have done with gun control legislation) you think all of these people would still be alive? Like I said, the left are very naive. They can't think outside of their naive partisan boxes.
Last edited: