- Joined
- Apr 28, 2015
- Messages
- 85,497
- Reaction score
- 72,210
- Location
- Third Coast
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
+1 :thumbs:Personally, I think declaring "executive privilege" is a farce. It only gives those in the Executive Branch of government, particularly the President, cover to skirt his obligation to be forthright with the people who elected him (or her) to office and to whom he serves. Now, to be fair it's one thing to refuse to answer questions on the grounds of national security. If by answering a specific question in a public forum would divulge classified information and, thus, put the nation or assets abroad at risk or even compromise foreign relations, then I can understand the POTUS or members of him/her Administration not answering such questions in open forum. That said, short of personal/private discussions, i.e., talks with his/her spouse or brainstorming sessions with his Cabinet that are NOT scheduled meetings nor emergency sessions, I think the presidency should be a rather open book.
So, if Bannon agreed to this public hearing but he exercised executive privilege that tells me either what he refused to discussed publicly was of a classified nature OR he has something to hide. If classified, he shouldn't have agreed to the public hearing. Thus, he should have talked.
That's my opinion and I really don't think it will change. Those in government who refuse to speak publicly about what they know and when usually have something to hide.
Those in office need to remember who the hell they work for. The last I read the Constitution, it was you & I.