• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

DHS preparing to arrest leaders of sanctuary cities

I told you three posts ago that we're talking about IDNYC. No, the requirements are not the same. Every fact you need to verify how wrong you are exists earlier in this thread, including several links to the government sites you have never visited. You are belligerently out of place in this conversation. Go away, fat man.

IDNYC no longer exists as a separate entity from the DMV. Old hat. It was introduced in the City Council by then Speaker Mark-Veverito, signed off by progressive Mayor Bill who first proposed idNYC during his first campaign, until the US Attorney General of the Eastern District received a restraining orders from the Eastern District Court, a year later. The NYS AG's office negotiated a settlement by placing all NY issued id's back we they previously existed, in the hands of DMV. Go climb a mountain.

Abandoned sites abound on the net, including gov't sites. Try keeping up with life, off the net. :lamo @ you
 
It's not but it takes some magical thinking to deny that what fascists have done can be done again. Clearly, the right wing is doing a lousy job of policing its own fanatics. The beginning, where the Jews were vilified by the leadership has some parallels to the rhetoric of anti-immigrant conservatives.

This is absurd. Having valid criticism of immigration and its costs doesn't mean we want to genocide non-whites. Why is wanting the best for your own people a non-starter? Why is everyone except for whites allowed to defend their own people?
 
IDNYC no longer exists as a separate entity from the DMV. Old hat. It was introduced in the City Council by then Speaker Mark-Veverito, signed off by progressive Mayor Bill who first proposed idNYC during his first campaign, until the US Attorney General of the Eastern District received a restraining orders from the Eastern District Court, a year later. The NYS AG's office negotiated a settlement by placing all NY issued id's back we they previously existed, in the hands of DMV. Go climb a mountain.

Abandoned sites abound on the net, including gov't sites. Try keeping up with life, off the net. :lamo @ you

Nope.

https://www.amny.com/news/idnyc-what-to-know-about-the-city-s-id-card-1.13026139
 
Begs the question, why is SF daring fed laws and with that, putting citizens in danger?



States are not required to enforce Federal law. SF isn’t peculiar as no city in the state of CA has to enforce Federal immigration law. Your saying by not doing so puts citizens in danger, which is unfounded because the state does enforce existing laws against violent and other crimes just like they would against anybody. When an illegal immigrant, who commits a violent crime, is deported by an intervening ICE instead of prosecuted and sent to prison, they can re-enter and be a threat to public safety. The Feds can go ahead and enforce federal immigration laws themselves. The federal government, under many programs, does not reimburse localities for the time and money spent enforcing immigration laws and when it does the reimbursement is partial at best.
 
What identification would I be able to present that wouldn't prove my citizenship?

Most forms of identification that IDNYC accepts do not prove citizenship. Your driver's license doesn't say what country you're from. Neither do diplomas, utility bills, leases, etc.
 
This is absurd. Having valid criticism of immigration and its costs doesn't mean we want to genocide non-whites. Why is wanting the best for your own people a non-starter? Why is everyone except for whites allowed to defend their own people?

Because, contrary to the beliefs of the president and his supporters, white does not equal best. Racist immigration policy is a non-starter.
 
Most forms of identification that IDNYC accepts do not prove citizenship. Your driver's license doesn't say what country you're from. Neither do diplomas, utility bills, leases, etc.

I cannot (or at least in the past could not, thanks California) get a driver's license unless I am in this country legally.
 
Because, contrary to the beliefs of the president and his supporters, white does not equal best. Racist immigration policy is a non-starter.

Let's settle on no immigration, then.
 
Back
Top Bottom