• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Vegas gunman's girlfriend told investigators her fingerprints would probably be on ammo; and they we

truthatallcost

DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 1, 2014
Messages
26,719
Reaction score
6,278
Location
California
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
LAS VEGAS_Her fingerprints were on the ammunition. Her casino players' card was found in his room. Investigators scoured her social media accounts and emails - one of which he, Stephen Paddock, had access to.
According to an affidavit, Danley was identified early on "as the most likely person who aided or abetted Stephen Paddock based on her informing law enforcement that her fingerprints would likely be found on the ammunition used during the attack."
The warrants released Friday also produced a puzzling email exchange that Paddock appeared to have with himself.

One instance where investigators identified two email account attached to him - CentralPark4804@gmail.com and CenterPark1@live.com - an exchange began with "Try an ar before u buy. We have a huge selection. Located in the Las Vegas area."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/v...e-on-ammo-and-they-were/ar-AAuDYvo?li=BBnb7Kz

Why would Danley's fingerprints be on the ammo? Why would Paddock email himself about an AR-15, and refer to himself as 'we'?

I don't have any theories to float here, I'm just genuinely puzzled, as I think we all are still.

Smoke em if ya got em, what's your opinion of all this?
 
Why would Danley's fingerprints be on the ammo? Why would Paddock email himself about an AR-15, and refer to himself as 'we'?

I don't have any theories to float here, I'm just genuinely puzzled, as I think we all are still.

Smoke em if ya got em, what's your opinion of all this?
The fingerprints on some of the ammo is irrelevant, that could have occurred long before he did his thing. Using we is common with people even when there is no we. The case is flimsy and an attempt to prosecute someone/anyone, she will beat it with ease, if it even goes to court.
 
Why would Danley's fingerprints be on the ammo? Why would Paddock email himself about an AR-15, and refer to himself as 'we'?

I don't have any theories to float here, I'm just genuinely puzzled, as I think we all are still.

Smoke em if ya got em, what's your opinion of all this?

I agree with Casper. Fingerprints on bullets don't mean anything because it doesn't tell you who fired the gun and when those prints got onto that ammo.
 
Why would Danley's fingerprints be on the ammo? Why would Paddock email himself about an AR-15, and refer to himself as 'we'?

I don't have any theories to float here, I'm just genuinely puzzled, as I think we all are still.

Smoke em if ya got em, what's your opinion of all this?

There is nothing illegal bout loading a mag for your boyfriend.

So, why not take her at her word? The man frequented shooting ranges from what I have read.
 
There is nothing illegal bout loading a mag for your boyfriend.

So, why not take her at her word? The man frequented shooting ranges from what I have read.

I used to get my hair cut at a place run by a true gun nut. NRA all the way. His stated (to me) belief: You were unarmed & unprepared if you owned less than 10,000 rounds of ammunition.
 
I used to get my hair cut at a place run by a true gun nut. NRA all the way. His stated (to me) belief: You were unarmed & unprepared if you owned less than 10,000 rounds of ammunition.

An NRA member was your hair stylist? You could probably write a sitcom around that.
 
The fingerprints on some of the ammo is irrelevant, that could have occurred long before he did his thing. Using we is common with people even when there is no we. The case is flimsy and an attempt to prosecute someone/anyone, she will beat it with ease, if it even goes to court.

I don't see any charges being filed over this. Whoever the LV D.A. is, they certainly aren't going to file with just this. We're all still hoping to learn more about why this shooting happened though, that's why I shared this.
 
I agree with Casper. Fingerprints on bullets don't mean anything because it doesn't tell you who fired the gun and when those prints got onto that ammo.
He could have asked her to help him load some magazines or some such in a completely innocent setting and framework.
 
You would find my wife’s finger prints on some of my ammo. I also sometimes email myself reminders. I might even copy and paste a note into the email. If she goes down it will require more than that.
 
You would find my wife’s finger prints on some of my ammo. I also sometimes email myself reminders. I might even copy and paste a note into the email. If she goes down it will require more than that.

I send myself a text sometimes, but I definitely don't refer to myself as 'we'.
Then again, that's probably the least oddest thing about the life of Stephen Paddock.
 
I send myself a text sometimes, but I definitely don't refer to myself as 'we'.
Then again, that's probably the least oddest thing about the life of Stephen Paddock.

Together, we are Breeze.

 
I don't see any charges being filed over this. Whoever the LV D.A. is, they certainly aren't going to file with just this. We're all still hoping to learn more about why this shooting happened though, that's why I shared this.

I agree, do not see charges being filed unless they decide to showboat and waste tax payer dollars. I doubt we will ever know the Why of it.
 
I send myself a text sometimes, but I definitely don't refer to myself as 'we'.
Then again, that's probably the least oddest thing about the life of Stephen Paddock.
I should start referring to myself in the 3rd person in reminders I email myself.

Of course, half the time I forget I sent myself the reminder...
 
Why would Danley's fingerprints be on the ammo? Why would Paddock email himself about an AR-15, and refer to himself as 'we'?

I don't have any theories to float here, I'm just genuinely puzzled, as I think we all are still.

Smoke em if ya got em, what's your opinion of all this?

The thing is that she just spontaneously made this declaration on her own, before they even asked her. Is she trying to protect herself from some wrongdoing on her part?
Did this guy leave her any money?
 
The fingerprints on some of the ammo is irrelevant, that could have occurred long before he did his thing. Using we is common with people even when there is no we. The case is flimsy and an attempt to prosecute someone/anyone, she will beat it with ease, if it even goes to court.

I agree with Casper. Fingerprints on bullets don't mean anything because it doesn't tell you who fired the gun and when those prints got onto that ammo.

There is nothing illegal bout loading a mag for your boyfriend.

So, why not take her at her word? The man frequented shooting ranges from what I have read.

He could have asked her to help him load some magazines or some such in a completely innocent setting and framework.

You would find my wife’s finger prints on some of my ammo. I also sometimes email myself reminders. I might even copy and paste a note into the email. If she goes down it will require more than that.

The thing is that she just spontaneously made this declaration on her own, before they even asked her. Is she trying to protect herself from some wrongdoing on her part?
Did this guy leave her any money?

Here's a new twist:

Indictment in Las Vegas mass shooting possible, police say

LAS VEGAS - Attorneys for the Las Vegas police said in district court Tuesday that there still could be criminal charges filed in relation to the mass shooting at a concert on the Las Vegas Strip that left 58 dead.
The revelation came as Nick Crosby, a lawyer representing the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, argued to keep search warrants, affidavits and findings sealed as "charges were being investigated." Police have said Stephen Paddock was the lone gunman in the Oct. 1 massacre.

He said the charges could emerge within the next 60 days.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/i...ing-possible-police-say/ar-AAuMGtK?li=BBnb7Kz

Maybe the gf isn't even who they're looking at here.
 
I agree with Casper. Fingerprints on bullets don't mean anything because it doesn't tell you who fired the gun and when those prints got onto that ammo.

This seems to be some sort of distraction, perhaps meant to keep the "single shooter" fantasy living. The facts are that at least 2 different guns were firing.
 
Back
Top Bottom