• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Priebus notes confirming Comey another tool for Robert Mueller - MSNBC

JacksinPA

Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Dec 3, 2017
Messages
26,290
Reaction score
16,771
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
Priebus notes confirming Comey another tool for Robert Mueller | MSNBC

Priebus took detailed notes of everything said or done in the WH. Mueller now his these notes which corroborate Comey's testimony that Trump asked him to drop his investigation of Flynn, which is obstruction of justice.

Obstruction of justice

Obstruction of justice is defined in the omnibus clause of 18 U.S.C. § 1503, which provides that "whoever . . . . corruptly or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice, shall be (guilty of an offense)." Persons are charged under this statute based on allegations that a defendant intended to intefere with an official proceeding, by doing things such as destroying evidence, or intefering with the duties of jurors or court officers.

A person obstructs justice when they have a specific intent to obstruct or interfere with a judicial proceeding. For a person to be convicted of obstructing justice, they must not only have the specific intent to obstruct the proceeding, but the person must know (1) that a proceeding was actually pending at the time; and (2) there must be a nexus between the defendant’s endeavor to obstruct justice and the proceeding, and the defendant must have knowledge of this nexus.

§ 1503 applies only to federal judicial proceedings. Under § 1505, however, a defendant can be convicted of obstruction of justice by obstructing a pending proceeding before Congress or a federal agency. A pending proceeding could include an informal investigation by an executive agency.
 
Priebus notes confirming Comey another tool for Robert Mueller | MSNBC

Priebus took detailed notes of everything said or done in the WH. Mueller now his these notes which corroborate Comey's testimony that Trump asked him to drop his investigation of Flynn, which is obstruction of justice.

Obstruction of justice

Obstruction of justice is defined in the omnibus clause of 18 U.S.C. § 1503, which provides that "whoever . . . . corruptly or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice, shall be (guilty of an offense)." Persons are charged under this statute based on allegations that a defendant intended to intefere with an official proceeding, by doing things such as destroying evidence, or intefering with the duties of jurors or court officers.

A person obstructs justice when they have a specific intent to obstruct or interfere with a judicial proceeding. For a person to be convicted of obstructing justice, they must not only have the specific intent to obstruct the proceeding, but the person must know (1) that a proceeding was actually pending at the time; and (2) there must be a nexus between the defendant’s endeavor to obstruct justice and the proceeding, and the defendant must have knowledge of this nexus.

§ 1503 applies only to federal judicial proceedings. Under § 1505, however, a defendant can be convicted of obstruction of justice by obstructing a pending proceeding before Congress or a federal agency. A pending proceeding could include an informal investigation by an executive agency.

If Mueller has to go with Obstruction of justice then the investigation found nothing that he could use.

Will the Congress Critters be guilt tripped into support of the charge?

I think yes, and then the nation will really crack into two.
 
Priebus notes confirming Comey another tool for Robert Mueller | MSNBC

Priebus took detailed notes of everything said or done in the WH. Mueller now his these notes which corroborate Comey's testimony that Trump asked him to drop his investigation of Flynn, which is obstruction of justice.

Obstruction of justice

Obstruction of justice is defined in the omnibus clause of 18 U.S.C. § 1503, which provides that "whoever . . . . corruptly or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice, shall be (guilty of an offense)." Persons are charged under this statute based on allegations that a defendant intended to intefere with an official proceeding, by doing things such as destroying evidence, or intefering with the duties of jurors or court officers.

A person obstructs justice when they have a specific intent to obstruct or interfere with a judicial proceeding. For a person to be convicted of obstructing justice, they must not only have the specific intent to obstruct the proceeding, but the person must know (1) that a proceeding was actually pending at the time; and (2) there must be a nexus between the defendant’s endeavor to obstruct justice and the proceeding, and the defendant must have knowledge of this nexus.

§ 1503 applies only to federal judicial proceedings. Under § 1505, however, a defendant can be convicted of obstruction of justice by obstructing a pending proceeding before Congress or a federal agency. A pending proceeding could include an informal investigation by an executive agency.

Yup, but the cadre of Trump loyalists won't believe any of it, they are too invested into their cult to think otherwise.
 
If Mueller has to go with Obstruction of justice then the investigation found nothing that he could use.

Will the Congress Critters be guilt tripped into support of the charge?

I think yes, and then the nation will really crack into two.

Obstruction of justice is a crime.
 
If Mueller has to go with Obstruction of justice then the investigation found nothing that he could use.

I don't quite understand your response here. Mueller has a) Comey's testimony, b) Comey's notes typed right after his meeting with Trump, c) McCabe's ability to corroborate Comey's testimony, and d) Priebus' notes. So your response makes no sense.
 
Last edited:
With as corrupt as Washington is and with as broken as our justice system is that is not much to hang a hat on.

People who break Federal laws go to Federal prison.
 
Priebus notes confirming Comey another tool for Robert Mueller | MSNBC

Priebus took detailed notes of everything said or done in the WH. Mueller now his these notes which corroborate Comey's testimony that Trump asked him to drop his investigation of Flynn, which is obstruction of justice.

Obstruction of justice

Obstruction of justice is defined in the omnibus clause of 18 U.S.C. § 1503, which provides that "whoever . . . . corruptly or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice, shall be (guilty of an offense)." Persons are charged under this statute based on allegations that a defendant intended to intefere with an official proceeding, by doing things such as destroying evidence, or intefering with the duties of jurors or court officers.

A person obstructs justice when they have a specific intent to obstruct or interfere with a judicial proceeding. For a person to be convicted of obstructing justice, they must not only have the specific intent to obstruct the proceeding, but the person must know (1) that a proceeding was actually pending at the time; and (2) there must be a nexus between the defendant’s endeavor to obstruct justice and the proceeding, and the defendant must have knowledge of this nexus.

§ 1503 applies only to federal judicial proceedings. Under § 1505, however, a defendant can be convicted of obstruction of justice by obstructing a pending proceeding before Congress or a federal agency. A pending proceeding could include an informal investigation by an executive agency.

There's already a long thread on this topic, so yours can end.

However, regardless what Maddow says, the NYT makes lots of claims without saying where they got the information from...not even citing unnamed sources. So...I have to ask...how on earth do they know WHAT Mueller is in possession of? How do they know WHAT that alleged stuff contains?

Is someone from Mueller's team...or Mueller, himself...leaking stuff from his own investigation to the NYT? Is the NYT making **** up completely?

Until we have the answers to these questions...until we see these "notes" from Priebus...I contend this whole NYT article is a big nothingburger and quite possibly outright fake news.
 
I contend this whole NYT article is a big nothingburger and quite possibly outright fake news.

Lol. If I had a five-spot for every time a Trumper here has said 'nothingburger' I'd be on a long Caribbean cruise right now.
 
Lol. If I had a five-spot for every time a Trumper here has said 'nothingburger' I'd be on a long Caribbean cruise right now.

A cruise? ****, with a fiver for every time you could buy the ship#
 
Lol. If I had a five-spot for every time a Trumper here has said 'nothingburger' I'd be on a long Caribbean cruise right now.

shrug...

All that means is that there are a lot of nothingburgers presented by the Mainstream Media.
 
If Mueller has to go with Obstruction of justice then the investigation found nothing that he could use.

Will the Congress Critters be guilt tripped into support of the charge?

I think yes, and then the nation will really crack into two.
Nah, don't worry about it.

Those 'deep state' Republicans that are in the tank for Wall Street, will see to it that no Republican president will ever be impeached -- they won't let it happen.

Even supposedly moderate Lindsey Graham, is kissing on Trumps butt cheeks, and helping take part in the cover-up. ;)
 
With as corrupt as Washington is and with as broken as our justice system is that is not much to hang a hat on.

Tu quoque fallacy.
 
Nah, don't worry about it.

Those 'deep state' Republicans that are in the tank for Wall Street, will see to it that no Republican president will ever be impeached -- they won't let it happen.

Even supposedly moderate Lindsey Graham, is kissing on Trumps butt cheeks, and helping take part in the cover-up. ;)

Trump is not a Republican is the first thing.

Second thing is that Republicans now almost always cave in to lefty written guilt trips, they have no spine, which is why Trump beat the entire R POTUS Candidate field in the first place
 
Priebus notes confirming Comey another tool for Robert Mueller | MSNBC

Priebus took detailed notes of everything said or done in the WH. Mueller now his these notes which corroborate Comey's testimony that Trump asked him to drop his investigation of Flynn, which is obstruction of justice.

Obstruction of justice

Obstruction of justice is defined in the omnibus clause of 18 U.S.C. § 1503, which provides that "whoever . . . . corruptly or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice, shall be (guilty of an offense)." Persons are charged under this statute based on allegations that a defendant intended to intefere with an official proceeding, by doing things such as destroying evidence, or intefering with the duties of jurors or court officers.

A person obstructs justice when they have a specific intent to obstruct or interfere with a judicial proceeding. For a person to be convicted of obstructing justice, they must not only have the specific intent to obstruct the proceeding, but the person must know (1) that a proceeding was actually pending at the time; and (2) there must be a nexus between the defendant’s endeavor to obstruct justice and the proceeding, and the defendant must have knowledge of this nexus.

§ 1503 applies only to federal judicial proceedings. Under § 1505, however, a defendant can be convicted of obstruction of justice by obstructing a pending proceeding before Congress or a federal agency. A pending proceeding could include an informal investigation by an executive agency.

Comey never claimed that.
 
Trump is not a Republican is the first thing.
m52qs.jpg
 
It was reported that Priebus was at the WH having lunch with Trump before the holidays.

I think there are a lot of speculations being made with little or no facts. The OpEd by Fusion in the NYTs, that turned out to be bogus. Lots of "opinions" being pushed as facts.
 
This was Putin's goal.

You do know that Putins critics in Russia are very unhappy that we are building up Putin so much in our fantasies, because it makes their jobs harder....RIGHT?
 
Back
Top Bottom