- Joined
- Feb 24, 2013
- Messages
- 35,027
- Reaction score
- 19,489
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Re: Trump Tower meeting with Russians 'treasonous', Bannon says in explosive book
Well, let's just say that if my assertion only relied of the Aussie lying then it would be based on far fewer assumptions than the conspiracy you currently believe took place! :lamo
Can you explain why an investigation that supposedly started with a report on George Papadopolous didn't even interview Papodopolous until January 2017? Can you explain why an investigation that started on a report about George Papodopolous chose to get a FISA warrant on Carter Page, and never got a warrant on George Papadopolous? Can you explain why the only charge filed against George Papadopolous is that he lied to the FBI in that January 2017 interview?
I mean, what the Aussie supposedly witnessed was an admission of a crime (right?)... and the FBI never talked to this supposed criminal until after the election? That doesn't seem odd to you? And it doesn't seem odd that there were endless leaks that gave us Carter Page, and Flynn, and Manafort... and yet we don't learn about Papadopolous' status as the origin of the investigation until AFTER the heat is rising on the funding of the dossier?
So to maintain your conspiracy theory you have to claim that the aussie diplomat is a liar. got it.
Well, let's just say that if my assertion only relied of the Aussie lying then it would be based on far fewer assumptions than the conspiracy you currently believe took place! :lamo
Can you explain why an investigation that supposedly started with a report on George Papadopolous didn't even interview Papodopolous until January 2017? Can you explain why an investigation that started on a report about George Papodopolous chose to get a FISA warrant on Carter Page, and never got a warrant on George Papadopolous? Can you explain why the only charge filed against George Papadopolous is that he lied to the FBI in that January 2017 interview?
I mean, what the Aussie supposedly witnessed was an admission of a crime (right?)... and the FBI never talked to this supposed criminal until after the election? That doesn't seem odd to you? And it doesn't seem odd that there were endless leaks that gave us Carter Page, and Flynn, and Manafort... and yet we don't learn about Papadopolous' status as the origin of the investigation until AFTER the heat is rising on the funding of the dossier?