• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump Tower meeting with Russians 'treasonous', Bannon says in explosive book [W:124]

Re: Trump Tower meeting with Russians 'treasonous', Bannon says in explosive book

I know, right? I'm the cat's meow.



Actually the Federalist did: Ted Kennedy Secretly Asked The Soviets To Intervene In 1984 Elections



You're a little late for that. The Democrats did that in the 1800's and it pretty much pooped out in the late 20th century. Only a moron would think it would make a comeback.

SO you DO think fascists are liberal.
That means you DO think Hitler was a liberal, ergo liberals are fascists.
So, did all those tiki torch kids with the khakis and the seig heil salutes go to the wrong rally?
It was called the "Unite the Right" rally.

Yep, you're doing the John Birch Society dance.
You not only know every dance step, you're coming up with some new ones.
That proves Claire Conner's assertion that the Birchers eventually became the Tea Party and that the Tea Party is now morphing into the alt-Right.

All you have to do is straighten out a few pretzel shaped contradictions in your head and you're good to go.

Meanwhile, a little music:

 
Re: Trump Tower meeting with Russians 'treasonous', Bannon says in explosive book

Well GREAT!! You got all that from Ted Kennedy's memo to a guy who lasted in office less than a year and a half. Oh, by the way, the original anti-war movement was bipartisan.
I was there, so don't insult my intelligence. And it doesn't matter that radical socialists managed to infiltrate and take over the anti-war movement as much as it matters that the entire war was built on lies. Are you attempting to defend the Vietnam War? Lotsa luck with that.
You Birchers are amazing.

Now YOU have YOUR wet dream, the US working together WITH the Imperial Russian Empire to install authoritarian fascist theocracy!
You should be proud of yourself.

But please, don't EVER pretend that you ever loved democracy, or anything about the original values that the Founding Fathers dreamed of when they made this country.

"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross."



Re-writing history is the most important aspect of propaganda. Read 1984 and the job of the main character in "The Ministry of Truth", it was his job to re-write all the news from history when enemies became allies and allies enemies.

It is the new meme, and actual claims that the US actually "won" in Vietnam.

Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain
 
Re: Trump Tower meeting with Russians 'treasonous', Bannon says in explosive book

Politifacts: Fox News host cites Ted Kennedy-KGB meeting that never happened
tom-false.png


Your story is made-up. You need to stop watching The Fox Propaganda network.

That doesn't even matter. Exposing that and catching TrumpPence2020 in a lie isn't even going to slow him down. What might work (no guarantees LOL) is forcing these people to make their authoritarian fascist theocracy wet dream work and then asking them why they believe in the Constitution so much after they've waxed poetic about Jeezus riding a dinosaur into the White House with twenty legions of goose stepping praetorian guards.
 
Re: Trump Tower meeting with Russians 'treasonous', Bannon says in explosive book

LOL! Politifacts are known liars and propagandists. I'm afraid it is you watching propaganda, not me. Typical liberal.
So what’s the basis for claims that, say, PolitiFact is biased? Hey, The Weekly Standard itself has explained the criteria:


Surveys done by the University of Minnesota and George Mason University have shown that the supposedly impartial “fact checking” news organization rates Republican claims as false three times as often as Democratic claims and twice as much, respectively.
Notice the implicit assumption here – namely, that impartial fact-checking would find an equal number of false claims from each party. But what if – bear with me a minute – Republicans actually make more false claims than Democrats?

Take a not at all arbitrary example: tax policy. The GOP is deeply committed to the proposition that tax cuts pay for themselves, a view that has no support whatsoever from professional economists. Can you find any comparable insistence on a view experts consider false on the Democratic side?
 
Back
Top Bottom