Fenton
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2012
- Messages
- 29,771
- Reaction score
- 12,231
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Re: Trump Tower meeting with Russians 'treasonous', Bannon says in explosive book
The Russia collusion investigation began back in July of 2016, when Christopher Steele briefed the FBI on the contents of a dossier that was actually just oppo-research funded by the DNC and the Hillary campaign. Thats over a year and half of investigations and still, no " overwhelming evidence " has been produced.
As for the leaks ? Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee issued a report on the avalanche of leaks that followed Trumps inauguration.
Senate Republicans: Leaks harming national security | TheHill
“Since President Trump assumed office, our nation has faced an unprecedented wave of potentially damaging leaks of information,” said the report from the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.
"Under President Trump, leaks are flowing at the rate of one a day," the report says, citing an examination of open-source material by the majority staff of Johnson's committee.
"Articles published by a range of national news organizations between January 20 and May 25, 2017 included at least 125 stories with leaked information potentially damaging to national security. Even a narrow search revealed leaks of comparable information during the Trump administration that were about seven times higher than the same period during the two previous administrations."
Many of the leaks have been related to investigations into Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election."that the Trump administration faced 125 leaks potentially damaging to national security in 126 days — a “conservative estimate,” it noted."
LOGIC dictates that during this time this " overwhelming evidence " would have made it to the NYTs or WaPo at least once.
When did this investigation achieve a higher professional plane ? Before or after Mueller hired Peter Sztrok ? Before or after Mueller hired Lisa Page ? Andrew Weissmann ? Aaron Zebley, who represented Justin Cooper, a key figure in the Clinton email controversy ?
Lets be honest, you people abandoned logic and replaced it with seething Trump hatred.
What evidence do you have that said material would have to have been "leaked" by now? Is it automatic in the US that details of an investigation get leaked, such a normal event that you DOUBT any wrongdoing BECAUSE it has not been leaked?
Buy your logic asinine.
The Russia collusion investigation began back in July of 2016, when Christopher Steele briefed the FBI on the contents of a dossier that was actually just oppo-research funded by the DNC and the Hillary campaign. Thats over a year and half of investigations and still, no " overwhelming evidence " has been produced.
As for the leaks ? Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee issued a report on the avalanche of leaks that followed Trumps inauguration.
Senate Republicans: Leaks harming national security | TheHill
“Since President Trump assumed office, our nation has faced an unprecedented wave of potentially damaging leaks of information,” said the report from the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.
"Under President Trump, leaks are flowing at the rate of one a day," the report says, citing an examination of open-source material by the majority staff of Johnson's committee.
"Articles published by a range of national news organizations between January 20 and May 25, 2017 included at least 125 stories with leaked information potentially damaging to national security. Even a narrow search revealed leaks of comparable information during the Trump administration that were about seven times higher than the same period during the two previous administrations."
Many of the leaks have been related to investigations into Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election."that the Trump administration faced 125 leaks potentially damaging to national security in 126 days — a “conservative estimate,” it noted."
LOGIC dictates that during this time this " overwhelming evidence " would have made it to the NYTs or WaPo at least once.
I suggest you may want to re-visit that thinking, if anything there being no leaks suggests the investigation is on a higher professional plane than what some Americans are used to..
When did this investigation achieve a higher professional plane ? Before or after Mueller hired Peter Sztrok ? Before or after Mueller hired Lisa Page ? Andrew Weissmann ? Aaron Zebley, who represented Justin Cooper, a key figure in the Clinton email controversy ?
Lets be honest, you people abandoned logic and replaced it with seething Trump hatred.