Well hell...if Wiki says it, it MUST be true, right?
Says the person quoting The Gateway Pundit quoting The Conservative Treehouse Twitter. I bet you have no idea how silly this comment of yours was, do you?
The shilling is strong right now. Also, the Gateway Pundit's re-quoting of Conservative Treehouse's Twitter "breakdown" is horrible. Let's just take the first couple of numbers.
Your lying source said:
1) Um Maggie, [@maggieNYT ] hate to undercut your *explosive story* on origin of Russia Probe. But George Papadopoulos talking in May 2016, is likely about this *open and public information* from April 2016.
Why is that likely? What makes that likely? From where do they get "likely" and how does that in any way refute the New York Times story when you don't even know what you're talking about, as evidenced by "likely"? Obviously Australian intelligence found it interesting enough to pass it up the chain and then eventually on the United States, who then opened an investigation, so I suspect the information passed wasn't "likely" publicly known, but rather contained details which weren't widely known.
Your lying source said:
Additionally, worth noting @maggieNYT is nowhere in the Joint Analysis Report [Comey, Brennan and Clapper construct] is anything about George Papadopoulos even hinted or alluded to.
Assuming this to be true (and I don't trust it to be, but we'll say it is for argument's sake), it has been well established by Comey in multiple hearings that unknown information about those under investigation is not revealed to the public while the investigation is proceeding. Once again, your source lied to you.
Your lying source said:
The @maggieNYT is also nonsense based on common sense. Papadopoulos was so important that:
July 15th 2016 Comey opens counterintel investigation into Russian collusion.
January 15th 2017 FBI visits Papadopoulos for first time.
FBI waited for six months to talk to him?
#3 made no point so we move to #4.
And yes, that is not at all uncommon. Want evidence? See how long they waited to interview Hillary Clinton about her e-mail server.
And I'm not going waste my time with any more of your lying sources. Try reading and presenting facts next time, not propaganda.
Tell me...do you know how Wiki operates?
More reliably than the Gateway Pundit and Conservative Treehouse, which are little more than propaganda blogs?
You sure do love your propaganda sources, don't you?