• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Papadopoulos role in Trump campaign appears extensive in undisclosed documents: report

JacksinPA said:
Don't believe a word of this ultra right wing smear outlet.
Click to expand...

You don't have to.

Just read and consider the points and questions presented. If you have good answers and responses, I'd like to hear them.
 
RAMOSS said:
The gateway pundit?? reallyi?? Why not go for the onion, or national enquirer while you are at it.
Click to expand...

Do you have answers to the questions presented? Do you have responses to the points presented?

Can you explain anything?

If so, bring it. If not...keep your head in the NYT sand.
 
Mycroft said:
Do you have answers to the questions presented? Do you have responses to the points presented?

Can you explain anything?

If so, bring it. If not...keep your head in the NYT sand.
Click to expand...

There is one thing that NYT is that the gateway pundit is not. And that is 'Reliable'.
 
Fearandloathing said:
What's amazing is that all of these actions are those of the guilty!
Click to expand...

It is true. Trump and his crew have made themselves appear guilty in every way possible, yet deny everything unless they are caught at it. And even then they often lie again. The idea that this behavior is what a innocent person would do is absurd.
 
JANFU said:
https://www.debatepolitics.com/newthread.php?do=newthread&f=23



https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/30/...st-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news



Could be another fountain of information, including who was briefed on what within the Trump inner circle
I would say he is definitely not a coffee boy as the WH tried to paint him as.

And this appears to be what drove the FBI to opening an investigation.
Click to expand...

You took the words right out of my mouth, He sure doesn't sound like a Coffee Boy!:2wave:
 
RAMOSS said:
There is one thing that NYT is that the gateway pundit is not. And that is 'Reliable'.
Click to expand...

Really?

So...what's reliable about them when their story is pretty much ripped to shreds?

btw, you DO know who "Maggie" is, don't you? You know her history, right? Believe me, anything SHE says can only be taken one way: Against Trump.
 
Winston said:
fake news, nothingburger, so what, everyone does opposition research, he doesn't even work in the White House anymore, Peter Strzok, the Clinton Foundation, Democrats paid for the dossier, Obama is a cocaine smuggler, and Democrats are really, really, really, *gasping for air........ evuuuuuuuhhhhhhLLLrggggggghhhh.... precious
Click to expand...

No need to gasp, plenty of air!:lol::lol:
 
JacksinPA said:
I saw nothing there worth responding to. Yellow journalism, perhaps with a hint of red? See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellow_journalism
Click to expand...

"Yellow journalism, or the yellow press, is a US term for a type of journalism that presents little or no legitimate well-researched news and instead uses eye-catching headlines to sell more newspapers."

Yes. I agree. That pretty much describes that NYT article to a T.
 
Mycroft said:
Really?

So...what's reliable about them when their story is pretty much ripped to shreds?

btw, you DO know who "Maggie" is, don't you? You know her history, right? Believe me, anything SHE says can only be taken one way: Against Trump.
Click to expand...

The gateway pundit is click bait. It's for people with fantasy's.
 
Winston said:
ah, yes... *ahem*

Preciouses Uranium was solded to the Russianses, Democrats are the ones who solded the precious, to Putinsez!
Click to expand...

Only you and Sean seem to care! Since the FBI says nothing wrong was done.:lol:
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
You only provided the link, not any important paragraphs from said links
Click to expand...

Read...and then talk about, if you can...the email chain that the article quotes.

I welcome your feedback. So far, none of your fellow forum members seem to be able to.
 
RAMOSS said:
The gateway pundit is click bait. It's for people with fantasy's.
Click to expand...

That article presents facts and questions. What do YOU have?

Oh...wait...that's right, the NYT.
 
JANFU said:
https://www.debatepolitics.com/newthread.php?do=newthread&f=23



https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/30/...st-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news



Could be another fountain of information, including who was briefed on what within the Trump inner circle
I would say he is definitely not a coffee boy as the WH tried to paint him as.

And this appears to be what drove the FBI to opening an investigation.
Click to expand...

Anybody still believing what the NYT writes must really belong to the group of the most stupid people on this planet.

Not my words, but it hits the nail on the head: COMMON SENSE: If a Papadopolous conversation in May 2016 was the origin, the source material, of the FBI counterintelligence operation, then why were they denied a FISA application in June/July 2016?

Why would the DOJ and FBI intelligence officials withhold this information from all congressional committees for a year, refuse to discuss it, yet somehow just release it to The NY Times? If it was simply innocuous – Think logically.
 
Barnacle said:
Anybody still believing what the NYT writes must really belong to the group of the most stupid people on this planet.

Not my words, but it hits the nail on the head: COMMON SENSE: If a Papadopolous conversation in May 2016 was the origin, the source material, of the FBI counterintelligence operation, then why were they denied a FISA application in June/July 2016?

Why would the DOJ and FBI intelligence officials withhold this information from all congressional committees for a year, refuse to discuss it, yet somehow just release it to The NY Times? If it was simply innocuous – Think logically.
Click to expand...

The circle jerkers don't seem to want to consider those questions.
 
Mycroft said:
That article presents facts and questions. What do YOU have?

Oh...wait...that's right, the NYT.
Click to expand...

Yes, yes, I do. And, unlike the 'gateway pundit' actually is news.
 
RAMOSS said:
Yes, yes, I do. And, unlike the 'gateway pundit' actually is news.
Click to expand...

News?

They gave you a story that doesn't hold together under cursory examination.

But hey...it's "news". That makes it real, doesn't it?
 
Mycroft said:
News?

They gave you a story that doesn't hold together under cursory examination.

But hey...it's "news". That makes it real, doesn't it?
Click to expand...

Just because the 'gateway pundit' tried to discredit it doesn't mean squat.
 
RUSSIA WANTS AMERICANS TO DOUBT MUELLER, EXPERTS WARN
Click to expand...
Russia Wants Americans to Doubt Mueller, Experts Warn

This is how bad America is, that I find this headline in Newsweek......Who gives a **** about what Russia/Putin want, what we want had better come first, and Truth had damn well better be at the front of the line.

We are so ignorant now, no wonder the place is a wreck.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom