• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump administration moves to boost homeland missile defense system despite multiple flaws

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
93,583
Reaction score
81,658
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Trump administration moves to boost homeland missile defense system despite multiple flaws


By David Willman
December 24, 2017

650x366


Citing North Korea’s growing nuclear and ballistic missile threat, the Trump administration is moving to vastly expand the problem-plagued homeland missile defense system despite warnings that the planned upgrades may not succeed. Immediate plans call for building two $1-billion radar installations and adding 20 rocket interceptors to the 44 already deployed in underground silos at Ft. Greely in Alaska and at Vandenberg Air Force Base in California. The Pentagon also is taking steps to launch new satellites to help each interceptor’s “kill vehicle” find, crash into and destroy incoming ballistic missiles high above the atmosphere. The expected cost is about $10.2 billion over five years, on top of more than $40 billion already spent for the system. On Thursday, Congress passed a short-term government funding bill that includes $200 million to start preparing construction of additional missile silos in Alaska. But government reports and interviews with technical experts suggest the planned upgrades, including a redesigned kill vehicle, are unlikely to protect the United States from a limited-scale ballistic missile attack, the system’s stated mission.

One concern is the administration’s rush to expand the system. The first new radar is scheduled to be made operational in 2020 before any flight testing is conducted. And the first set of redesigned kill vehicles will be installed in late 2021 — following just one flight test of a prototype. All the new interceptors and kill vehicles are supposed to be in place by the end of 2023. “There’s no way to prove out the design — let alone its reliability — without more flight tests,” said L. David Montague, a former aerospace executive who co-chaired a National Academy of Sciences panel of 16 experts that recommended ways to improve U.S. missile defenses in 2012. “It’s stupid.” Some experts fear that U.S. overconfidence in the missile defense system could lead to miscalculations in the standoff with Pyongyang. “The response to North Korea is, ‘Let’s spend billions of dollars more on missile defense,’ ” said Laura Grego, a physicist who led a 2016 study of the anti-missile system for the nonpartisan Union of Concerned Scientists. “But we ought to be very careful that we’re not fooling ourselves.” The Missile Defense Agency, the Pentagon division responsible for protecting the nation from a limited ballistic missile attack, did not respond to questions for this article.

Spend billions and [fingers crossed] hope it works. Not a very rational modus operandi to defend against a potentially catastrophic nightmare.
 
well, the US has spent trillion$ on **** that does not work; what's another $10.2 billion? Merry Christmas & pass the Jack Daniels .............
 
We should have put more money into research, I guess.

Dont try to build it till you have mastered the Technology was Admiral Rickovers America...Long Dead.
 
This is how we have worked/not worked since Rumsfeld and his "Leap ahead technology" push and "Transformation".....old news.

Rumswiller went before Congress on September 19, 2001 to tell Congress that the Pentagon had no way to account for nearly $2.5 TRILLION ................ WTF?

well, the next day was George W. Bush day & then every Congress person completely ****ing forgot about the MISSING $2.5 TRILLION

Great country U got there ...........................
 
Rumswiller went before Congress on September 19, 2001 to tell Congress that the Pentagon had no way to account for nearly $2.5 TRILLION ................ WTF?

well, the next day was George W. Bush day & then every Congress person completely ****ing forgot about the MISSING $2.5 TRILLION

Great country U got there ...........................

Bad accounting, bad procurement processes, extremely bloated bureaucracy, an officers corps who failed in NAM, then over a generation largely recovered by the time the Soviets crashed, and then they got repeatedly hammered and so now they are again not very good...and on and on it goes.

We are likely to get humiliated the next time we need to fight a real war....versus nation building or police actions...which we also really suck at.
 
Bad accounting, bad procurement processes, extremely bloated bureaucracy, an officers corps who failed in NAM, then over a generation largely recovered by the time the Soviets crashed, and then they got repeatedly hammered and so now they are again not very good...and on and on it goes.

We are likely to get humiliated the next time we need to fight a real war....versus nation building or police actions...which we also really suck at.

just ANOTHER demonstration that the US NEEDS to keep track of it's own goddamn backyard & stay the **** outta other's business ...............
 
well, the US has spent trillion$ on **** that does not work; what's another $10.2 billion? Merry Christmas & pass the Jack Daniels .............

Corporate Welfare Queens on steroids. The MIC. Create a real or fictitious enemy, demonize them in the MSM, generate fear, start a war if necessary. You know, this is about big business in the real World. A wonderful fantasy World exists in the MSM with demons and evil, don't ya' know, a/k/a marketing for Military Offense Industries.
/
 
An example of how this ICBM paranoia can get out of control is the so-called Russian 'WOODPECKER' or Duga Over The Horizon (OTH) Radar. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duga_radar

This monster was intended to detect incoming U.S. ICBM's beyond the horizon by bouncing very powerful radar pulses off the ionosphere & listening in between pulses for signal returns bouncing off incoming thermonuclear warheads. This thing used so much electric power that it was the main reason for the building of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant in the Ukraine. Long dead. But if we don't learn from the past we will only repeat it.
 
Corporate Welfare Queens on steroids. The MIC. Create a real or fictitious enemy, demonize them in the MSM, generate fear, start a war if necessary. You know, this is about big business in the real World. A wonderful fantasy World exists in the MSM with demons and evil, don't ya' know, a/k/a marketing for Military Offense Industries.
/

Raytheon, General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman - all the donor-class corporations that will make a killing selling junk to Trump. The military loves new junk & Trump wants a reason to give it to them.
 
The problem with any missile defense system is that everything has to work 100% & that level of efficiency is usually not obtainable in very large & complex systems that are, after all, run by fallible humans.
 
just ANOTHER demonstration that the US NEEDS to keep track of it's own goddamn backyard & stay the **** outta other's business ...............

Hey may over the last year I have come to appreciate your post quality:

+ 1 2 U
 
Corporate Welfare Queens on steroids. The MIC. Create a real or fictitious enemy, demonize them in the MSM, generate fear, start a war if necessary. You know, this is about big business in the real World. A wonderful fantasy World exists in the MSM with demons and evil, don't ya' know, a/k/a marketing for Military Offense Industries.
/

You R another guy who is abnormally Good:

+ 1 2 U 2
 
To be fair, you can’t improve upon a technology unless you try. I am much more inclined to spend money on defensive systems than I am to wage pointless and endless wars around the world.
 
To be fair, you can’t improve upon a technology unless you try. I am much more inclined to spend money on defensive systems than I am to wage pointless and endless wars around the world.

And 2 B FAIR being fair is a good idea that we all 2 often fail to accomplish anymore.

+1 2 U....Another Good 1 HERE
 
Back
Top Bottom