• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama administration undermined anti-Hezbollah task force to help secure Iran nuke deal

1. The Bolded is incorrect. "Any" arrest does not demonstrate that the Obama administration did not choose to hinder investigations into Iran and their clients, despite their abuses on our soil, in order to pursue a nuclear deal with Iran.

Here’s the part about extradicting Fayad. First, he was indicted contrary to the “narrative” of the “story”. Here the author “assures” us the Obama administration didn’t “try hard enough”.

But for the nearly two years Fayad was in custody, top Obama administration officials declined to apply serious pressure on the Czech government to extradite him to the United States, even as Putin was lobbying aggressively against it.

With Putin was lobbying against it, how does that prove “Obama administration officials declined to apply serious pressure”? It doesn’t. In fact it shows that the Czechs might have had a reason not to extradite him, “serious pressure” or not. After informing us that Fayad was back in business (and of course you assume its Obama’s fault”) we get this incoherent mess later in the “story”.

Former Obama administration officials declined to comment on individual cases, but noted that the State Department condemned the Czech decision not to hand over Fayad. Several of them, speaking on condition of anonymity, said they were guided by broader policy objectives, including de-escalating the conflict with Iran, curbing its nuclear weapons program and freeing at least four American prisoners held by Tehran, and that some law enforcement efforts were undoubtedly constrained by those concerns.

So several “unnamed sources” (remember, conservatives no longer accept “unnamed sources”) said they were guided by “broader policies”. Mmmmm, condemning the Czech decision was not driven by “broader policies”. It was driven by wanting to extradite Fayad. You are supposed to infer that not extraditing was part of “broader policies” because that’s the “narrative”. What the “author” leaves out is that the Czechs actually traded Fayad for Czech hostages. That is just a fact and since it undermines the “narrative” you don’t learn it in the “story”. I simply googled “US tries to extradite Fayad from Czechoslovakia 2014 “ and got this.

Czech Defense Minister Martin Stropnicky said five Czech citizens who went missing in Lebanon in July were released by their captors in exchange for a guarantee that Fayad would not be extradited.

https://www.rferl.org/a/prague-lebanese-ali-fayad-released-extradition-us/27532663.html

Now if you actually click on the link you’ll see in the very next paragraph that the Czech govt denies it was an exchange deal but it was an exchange deal. Remember, not indicting a bank and not extraditing Fayad are the “smoking guns” of the “story” and they are officially BS. And don’t forget, the DEA press release proves “ripped apart” and “derailed” are lies.
 
Again, I don't have to back up "you're wrong, back up your claims" but what do you call this from your link?



And don't forget you posted the definition of regional power: This term is used to describe a nation that exercises influence and power within a region.

I guess its safe to assume you have no intention of backing up your claims but if you do, start with the first one

Barely enough food and medicine to feed and care for their own people
our allies in Europe only went along with the deal to "make money hand over fist
the deal set the stage for possibly a regional nuclear arms race

I have you back on ignore, as I'm finding the discussion with MSgt far more worthwhile than any I've had with you.

Enjoy the day.
 
I have you back on ignore, as I'm finding the discussion with MSgt far more worthwhile than any I've had with you.

Enjoy the day.

eorhn, this is a debate forum. You repeatedly made ridiculous claims and I asked you to back them up. You flailed and whined and deflected but didn't back up your claims. when it comes time to choose narrative or integrity, you again chose narrative.
 
eorhn, this is a debate forum. You repeatedly made ridiculous claims and I asked you to back them up. You flailed and whined and deflected but didn't back up your claims. when it comes time to choose narrative or integrity, you again chose narrative.

Asked and answered, as I've said.

Please go troll someone else for a change.

New Years resolution is going to be to stop feeding trolls.
 
Asked and answered, as I've said.

Please go troll someone else for a change.

New Years resolution is going to be to stop feeding trolls.

what is it about your obedience to conservatism that makes you think its okay to post things even you know are false? You have absolutely not even attempted to back up these ridiculous "narratives'.

Barely enough food and medicine to feed and care for their own people
our allies in Europe only went along with the deal to "make money hand over fist
the deal set the stage for possibly a regional nuclear arms race

Just like when you claimed "bush was president in 2000" and hilariously "proved" it, you simply posted what you wish was true. and just like then, you whine at me and about me as a typical and cowardly conservative dodge from your posts.
 
Maybe the investigation will clear things up.

More will come out along this line.

Hey guys, when I saw Trump backed out of the Iran Deal, I thought of this thread. I wonder if the investigation you guys posted about played a part in Trump's decision? Oh wait, I proved this thread was based on just another steaming pile of lies from the right. Nevermind.
 
Back
Top Bottom