I don't want to spend one of my free WaPo links on this story and so don't know about other accusations. But from CNN about the 2013 incident:
His accuser said the alleged sexual assault took place in the early hours of New Year's Day in 2013 when she was 17, according to the center's explosive investigative report published Monday. The accuser, identified as Maranda Richmond, is now 21.
From what I understand, the man's daughter was in the room while this sexual assault allegedly happened. Yet the daughter did not wake, nor does she have any idea of what did or did not go on that night. I figure that's most likely why the case was dropped in the first place.
She said she was staying in a living area of Louisville's Heart of Fire Church, where Johnson served as pastor, when he drunkenly kissed her and fondled her underneath her clothes, according to the investigative report.
Richmond reported the incident to authorities in April 2013, and the Louisville Metro Police Department initially opened an investigation, but closed it without charging Johnson, according to the Kentucky Center for Investigative Reporting.
Kentucky lawmaker found dead after sexual assault allegations - CNN
What exactly is this Kentucky Center for Investigative Reporting? CNN reports that this Center "got its hands" on police reports from 2013, and I thought that was interesting phrasing.
Ya I've gotten to the point now where I won't even change the channel to CNN. I don't really like FOX and never really have.
So now I learn and get my news from the Internet...mostly. Be that as it may, this continuing #MeToo thing has proven to be as dangerous as I've been saying it is. some posters here carry on as if I've spat in their Corn Flakes, because I don't blindly believe crap that smells bad. Last night I hung around with my wife, while she watched You Tube news. I tried to explain to her that Paul Watson is as much of an opportunistic little sh1t as Don Lemon is on CNN. But she's a Bohemian country girl and...well...she thinks most of the women here are nuts so...
Its been pointed out that Dan Johnson had an issue with internet porn too. That doesn't bode well for his claims of innocents, and can only serve as evidence of his character. Yet was he the porn addict they claim her was, or had he visited porn sites, as most people have I'd imagine, out of curiosity? This particular issue with porn, is another reason I believe the Internet needs real policing and throttled control. This free for all is also being weaponized. But that's another debate...
Real sex offenders of either sex should be dealt with. And its incredibly unfortunate but, proving offense is often impossible. Its a common "He said, She said" thing. Throughout my life I've learned that when I hear such arguments, the reality of the situation is smack in the middle. Gawd-damn near every time.
Be careful with this new weapon you have people. For as much as I know that men can be and are sh1theads, in the most general of terms you understand, hell hath no fury, like a woman scorned. I just cannot blindly believe any one side completely, because I know the truth of unsubstantiated accusations, lies smack in the middle of the 2 side's stories.