• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Roy Moore, facing allegations of sexual misconduct with teenage girls, sits down for interview

No, no rational adult is left to wonder that. You made the claim about a 'rabid lynch mob' and have yet to back that up.

Way to run away when you get caught! ROFLMAO

'Rabid lynch mob'. What a quaint little flight of delusional wishful thinking.

No wonder you're backing away from it and hoping no one notices.

I stand behind my claim -- it's a rabid lynch-mob. While there are some folks who can effectively put forth their opposition to Moore in a rational manner -- the vast majority are no different from the old Church Fathers who hauled the innocent women of Salem to the nearest tall oak because "more than a few" little females pointed their fingers and declared them to be witches.

This is what the Democratic Party would be doing today if they could get by with it.
300px-ExecutionAnnHibbins1.jpg



Now, let's talk about how you falsified the title of an article, shall we?
 
Well Roy Moore just rode away on horseback after voting........

Am I the only one thinking...."how old is that filly?"

Was he doing that cute little Yosemite Sam cosplay he likes to do sometimes?
 
Way to run away when you get caught! ROFLMAO

And yet more of your fetid imagination on display. I wasn't caught in anything, and I'm still right here, watching you bumble about, unable to back up your claim. As usual.
I stand behind my claim -- it's a rabid lynch-mob. While there are some folks who can effectively put forth their opposition to Moore in a rational manner -- the vast majority are no different from the old Church Fathers who hauled the innocent women of Salem to the nearest tall oak because "more than a few" little females pointed their fingers and declared them to be witches.

LOL! Stomp your feet and clench your tiny fists white in impotent rage all you'd like, but you saying that it's a 'rabid lynch mob' won't magically make so, no can you demonstrate that this in any way similar to what happened in Salem. Your desperation is really on full display now.
This is what the Democratic Party would be doing today if they could get by with it.
300px-ExecutionAnnHibbins1.jpg

More of your nutjob braying, right on time.
Now, let's talk about how you falsified the title of an article, shall we?

Let's talk about how your lie about me falsifying anything and your magical thinking.
 
Way to run away when you get caught! ROFLMAO



I stand behind my claim -- it's a rabid lynch-mob. While there are some folks who can effectively put forth their opposition to Moore in a rational manner -- the vast majority are no different from the old Church Fathers who hauled the innocent women of Salem to the nearest tall oak because "more than a few" little females pointed their fingers and declared them to be witches.

This is what the Democratic Party would be doing today if they could get by with it.
300px-ExecutionAnnHibbins1.jpg



Now, let's talk about how you falsified the title of an article, shall we?

Oh no.... that's no hyperbolic or over-dramatic at all.
 
Was he doing that cute little Yosemite Sam cosplay he likes to do sometimes?

170925-roy-moore-silver-revolver-ac-1028p_174d3c9ea036cda80c5a35264adaed76.nbcnews-fp-1200-630-e1510635173253.jpg

"Open up this door ... open it up right now little girl!" -- Yosemite Roy
 
And yet more of your fetid imagination on display. I wasn't caught in anything, and I'm still right here, watching you bumble about, unable to back up your claim. As usual.

Ah, look at that. You hate getting called out on your blatant dishonesty so immediately immediately the sharp little claws come out. LOL

There. There. What a lot of spittle and hiss. Take a deep breath. Care for a saucer of milk?

LOL! Stomp your feet and clench your tiny fists white in impotent rage all you'd like, but you saying that it's a 'rabid lynch mob' won't magically make so, no can you demonstrate that this in any way similar to what happened in Salem. Your desperation is really on full display now.

Both involved finger-pointing from multiple females. In both instances we find the intellectually weak ready to lynch - symbolically, of course, in Moore's case -- but it's the same thing. We have the juvenile thinking that just because there were multiple females, it must be true. Ohhhh...how scary!

More of your nutjob braying, right on time.

Let's talk about how your lie about me falsifying anything and your magical thinking.

Yes, let's talk about your falsifying of the title of an article in an effort to deceive the posters on this forum.

The REAL Title is, of course, A 'rabid lynch mob'? What a quaint thing to say. Richard Shelby is part of a 'rabid lynch mob'? The National Review is part of a 'rabid lynch mob'? [url=http://www.nationalreview.com/article/454542/roy-moore-election-conservative-case-against-him]Roy Moore's Election: The Conservative Case Against Him | National Review What fun it must be to imagine that while whistling past reality,.[/QUOTE]"]"The Comprehensive Case Against Roy Him"[/URL]

And you intentionally changed the word, "Comprehensive" to "Conservative" out of some warped need to deceive. Or learning disability that's lurking in the background somewhere. Perhaps just 9 monkeys typing at random on your keyboard? LOL

Fascinating.

A 'rabid lynch mob'? What a quaint thing to say. Richard Shelby is part of a 'rabid lynch mob'? The National Review is part of a 'rabid lynch mob'? Roy Moore's Election: The Conservative Case Against Him | National Review

What fun it must be to imagine that while whistling past reality,.
 
Ah, look at that. You hate getting called out on your blatant dishonesty so immediately immediately the sharp little claws come out. LOL

There. There. What a lot of spittle and hiss. Take a deep breath. Care for a saucer of milk?

It's OK. Your impotent rage issues can be worked out. It's just that this isn't the right venue. Have you asked anyone at your shelter for assistance?
Both involved finger-pointing from multiple females. In both instances we find the intellectually weak ready to lynch - symbolically, of course, in Moore's case -- but it's the same thing. We have the juvenile thinking that just because there were multiple females, it must be true. Ohhhh...how scary!

Still no rational case for the 'rabid lynch mob', I see. I can understand why you're having such a meltdown.
Yes, let's talk about your falsifying of the title of an article in an effort to deceive the posters on this forum.

The REAL Title is, of course, "The Comprehensive Case Against Roy Him"

And you intentionally changed the word, "Comprehensive" to "Conservative" out of some warped need to deceive. Or learning disability that's lurking in the background somewhere. Perhaps just 9 monkeys typing at random on your keyboard? LOL

Fascinating.

Yes, let's talk about your pathological dishonesty and ignorance of how the Internet works.

When one does a Google search for what I searched for, the word "Conservative" comes up, not 'Comprehensive'. Hoisted on the petard of your own, gleeful ignorance and desperation for once in your life not to embarrass yourself.

https://www.google.com/search?clien...7k1j0i131i67k1j0i22i30k1j0i13k1.0._xyFe7PdNEM

Nice owning you, as always.
 
Last edited:
If the shoe fits -- kick yourself with it.

You sure you don't want to break out the nazi references? You are on a roll. Maybe you should go with how liberals would kill Jesus or something?
 
Roy Moore interviewed by 12 year old girl - Business Insider



If this was supposed to be a PR move, they should fire whoever is doing their PR. They sent a 12 year old kid, who though impressive for her interest in these issues, to validate a guy who sometimes hangs out around teenagers and admitted to dating them even if not generally. There is something wrong with the entire scene and it's a shame that her parents couldn't exercise a bit more common sense. The defense of Moore is 100% on. Supporters have argued that the virgin Mary was similar to the underage victim of a pedophile, they have argued that it's only a minor problem that Moore is into 14 year old girls, the next logical step is for them to find kids that can be coached into demonstrating that Roy Moore isn't a threat to 12 year old girls, just as long as there is a camera present.

So gross the whole thing.

Most folks do not believe the sexual misconduct allegations against either Moore or Trump because they are obviously politically motivated, and aside form the word of some highly dubious people prior to the elections there is no evidence they ever existed.
 
It's OK. Your impotent rage issues can be worked out. It's just that this isn't the right venue. Have you asked anyone at your shelter for assistance?

Still no rational case for the 'rabid lynch mob', I see. I can understand why you're having such a meltdown.

Yes, let's talk about your pathological dishonesty and ignorance of how the Internet works.

When one does a Google search for what I searched for, the word "Conservative" comes up, not 'Comprehensive'. Hoisted on the petard of your own, gleeful ignorance and desperation for once in your life not to embarrass yourself.

https://www.google.com/search?clien...7k1j0i131i67k1j0i22i30k1j0i13k1.0._xyFe7PdNEM

Nice owning you, as always.


Perhaps you should have actually done the adult thing and read the article to see what the actual title was instead of guessing. Google's algorithm makes results clickable, based on optimized terms.

Not understanding what you're doing on a search engine is no excuse for making such blatant mistakes. Like so many other net trolls, you took the intellectually lazy way out.

Deceptively, or by childish error, that type of misrepresentation is inexcusable. I hope this has taught you a lesson.

You should apologize to the forum for falsifying the title. I'm sure you won't - egotists never do - but it would be the right thing to do.
 
You sure you don't want to break out the nazi references? You are on a roll. Maybe you should go with how liberals would kill Jesus or something?

I'll leave that all up to you, seeing as you seem to be entertaining the idea, and all.
 
Perhaps you should have actually done the adult thing and read the article to see what the actual title was instead of guessing. Google's algorithm makes results clickable, based on optimized terms.

Perhaps you shouldn't have shot your mouth of so soon and looked the fool. Oh, wait. You never actually do that.
Not understanding what you're doing on a search engine is no excuse for making such blatant mistakes. Like so many other net trolls, you took the intellectually lazy way out.

Still no rational case for your histrionic 'rabid lynch mob', I see. Your intellectual cowardice is becoming legendary.
Deceptively, or by childish error, that type of misrepresentation is inexcusable. I hope this has taught you a lesson.

The only lesson it taught me is how pathetically dishonest you are.
You should apologize to the forum for falsifying the title. I'm sure you won't - egotists never do - but it would be the right thing to do.

I didn't falsify the title. Why keep lying and proving yourself an idiot?
 
The sheer hubris in setting up the interview with a young girl is appalling.
 
I don't understand how a human being with a brain capable of functional communication thought this was a good idea.
 
It was obviously a PR ploy, but when you're being railroaded by a rabid lynch-mob, you don't have a lot of options in how to respond, except to deny the accusations against you and try to present a different point of view.

Howard, I'm sure your conservative masters appreciate your obedience but see how your hyperbole filled whine ignores the point of the thread that Moore was interviewed by a 12 year old girl. You can easily "deny the accusations against you and try to present a different point of view" to an adult interviewer.
 
Perhaps you shouldn't have shot your mouth of so soon and looked the fool. Oh, wait. You never actually do that.

"...shot your mouth "of"...?" Dude, if you're going to throw out childish insults, at least try to spell correctly.

Still no rational case for your histrionic 'rabid lynch mob', I see. Your intellectual cowardice is becoming legendary.

It appears you see yourself in that remark. I knew you would.

The only lesson it taught me is how pathetically dishonest you are.

I didn't falsify the title. Why keep lying and proving yourself an idiot?

Of course you falsified the title. The title you posted and the title of the article are different. I don't think anyone expected you to man up to your mistake. It takes a man to do that, after all. All your pathetic attempts to detract from your mistake are sad, man.

Sad.
 
Sorry you got slapped down so hard in public.

Still, it seems to be the one talent you possess, so good on ya!

You embarrass yourself with the best of 'em.

You call an anonymous forum, "public?" We really shouldn't expect anything more from someone who doesn't know how Google works, I suppose.

Still in full kittens and claws mode, I see.

I'm not coming down on your technologically challenged posting habits; I'm happy when you actually form a complete sentence. Between your spelling errors, and your obvious lack of understanding concerning how the net works, I think most of the members here probably cheer when you get a sentence correct.

Sheath the claws and tone down the hissing. Your monitor has to be absolutely drenched in spittle.
 
"...shot your mouth "of"...?" Dude, if you're going to throw out childish insults, at least try to spell correctly.

LOL! That's all you have after having been caught in yet another lie? Spelling?
It appears you see yourself in that remark. I knew you would.

It appears you're still running away from it, tail tucked between your legs, as usual.
Of course you falsified the title. The title you posted and the title of the article are different. I don't think anyone expected you to man up to your mistake. It takes a man to do that, after all. All your pathetic attempts to detract from your mistake are sad, man.

Sad.

The link created the title, but feel free to lie about it to your hearts content. I get the distinct impression that not only is honesty a difficult thing for you to grasp, but the Internet remains a complete mystery to you.

Hint: when you're caught in a lie of your own making, stop digging the hole that got you there in the first place.
 
You call an anonymous forum, "public?" We really shouldn't expect anything more from someone who doesn't know how Google works, I suppose.

Yes, public. Anyone can join. Anonymity has nothing to do with that. This seems to confuse and upset you.
Still in full kittens and claws mode, I see.

Still smarting from being exposed as a complete fool, I see.
I'm not coming down on your technologically challenged posting habits; I'm happy when you actually form a complete sentence. Between your spelling errors, and your obvious lack of understanding concerning how the net works, I think most of the members here probably cheer when you get a sentence correct.

Sheath the claws and tone down the hissing. Your monitor has to be absolutely drenched in spittle.

While it's amusing that you dance to the tune I call, calling out your various and frequent lies and watching you prance about, it's ultimately a waste of time.

Eh. Your various intellectual and emotional pathologies really aren't my concern.

Tell you what: since I'm done mopping the floor with you, go ahead and have the last word. It's clear that you desperately need it and you're exactly the type of fool to take it and prove me right. Again.
 
Back
Top Bottom