• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Wife of demoted DOJ official worked for firm behind anti-Trump dossier[W:68]

Here we go with the spooky music again. For someone so obsessed with how dishonest he thinks the FBI, DOJ, and DNC are, you sure do seem to be quite the Trump sycophant. But I guess your politics doesn't allow you to be genuine in your disdain for corruption. How convenient.

I see you can't approach the subject so you divert into rhetoric. Interesting.
 
Actually, some of the dossier has been verified...and none of the rest has yet been shown to be false. Of course we can only use the claims that have been verified...but the fact that some of the claims have been verified means that the rest of the dossier can't easily be dismissed out-of-hand as y'all want so desperately to do. That's why the rest of the claims are being investigated.

So your case is "well, some of it might be true."

Good luck.
 
This much is clear.

Obama had a dossier fabricated so that he could use the FBI to wiretap his political opponents.
 
The fact that you can't directly address the argument speaks volumes.
Your deflection doesn't do anything.

Under obama we found out just how corrupt and unethical they were.

I see you can't approach the subject so you divert into rhetoric. Interesting.

I'm approaching the "subject" head on. You people like to squirm and writhe in pig ****, complaining about corruption...but you voted for and/or support Donald Trump. Makes you insincere and not to be taken seriously.
 
I'm approaching the "subject" head on. You people like to squirm and writhe in pig ****, complaining about corruption...but you voted for and/or support Donald Trump. Makes you insincere and not to be taken seriously.

Yet you do it again. Please address the argument rather than the deflection nonsense.
That doesn't work around here.

neither does your last statement. The only person you discredit is yourself.
 
Yet you do it again. Please address the argument rather than the deflection nonsense.
That doesn't work around here.

neither does your last statement. The only person you discredit is yourself.

Oh, but it does work around here. You see, you take spreading your bull**** very seriously. I do not take you spreading your bull**** seriously at all. I make fun of you for it. Because this is the internet, where folks like you can get on a forum and spew nonsense and hope to be taken seriously. You think you are actually winning something, lol.

Don't get mad, sis.
 
I'm approaching the "subject" head on. You people like to squirm and writhe in pig ****, complaining about corruption...but you voted for and/or support Donald Trump. Makes you insincere and not to be taken seriously.

You are just running around the subject without addressing anything. Your post didn't even attempt to address the subjects in his posts. I noticed you have a super wide paint brush there. I take it that your favorite color might be rhetoric. Who did you vote for?
 
You are just running around the subject without addressing anything. Your post didn't even attempt to address the subjects in his posts. I noticed you have a super wide paint brush there. I take it that your favorite color might be rhetoric. Who did you vote for?

Gary Johnson. I had no other realistic choice. I despised Hillary Clinton for maligning law enforcement and pushing a false narrative about white cops running around murdering innocent black men. And I had too much self-respect to vote for Donald Trump.
 
"Wife of demoted DOJ official worked for firm behind anti-Trump dossier"
So, Clarence Thomas, who voted on Bush v Gore, has a wife who was working on the Bush transition team and Scalia's son worked for the law firm representing Bush.
 
"Wife of demoted DOJ official worked for firm behind anti-Trump dossier"
So, Clarence Thomas, who voted on Bush v Gore, has a wife who was working on the Bush transition team and Scalia's son worked for the law firm representing Bush.

Queue up "STOP LIVING IN THE PAST LIBTARD! GET OVER IT WE WON FAIR AND SQUARE!"
 
Queue up "STOP LIVING IN THE PAST LIBTARD! GET OVER IT WE WON FAIR AND SQUARE!"
Ah, "libtard." That's very clever. You cleverly take "lib" from "liberal' and "tard" as in "retard." Think of that yourself?
 
Actually, some of the dossier has been verified...and none of the rest has yet been shown to be false. Of course we can only use the claims that have been verified...but the fact that some of the claims have been verified means that the rest of the dossier can't easily be dismissed out-of-hand as y'all want so desperately to do. That's why the rest of the claims are being investigated.


If there is a sex tape made in Moscow I hope it never sees the day light. To watch D Trump in the nude is enough to make this gay boy go hetro !! Ewwww
 
Ah, "libtard." That's very clever. You cleverly take "lib" from "liberal' and "tard" as in "retard." Think of that yourself?

No, that was not mine. Our fine friends on the right half of the forum came up with that a long time ago. I called them Conservitards and Trumptards, but they don't get it.

But I'm tellin you, someone, somewhere in Trumpland read your post and they are screaming that word. It's a given.
 
Last edited:
Glen Contrarian identifies as a progressive
Glen Contrarian enjoys rubbing peanut butter on his nipples
Glen Contrarian joined debate politics in 2013
Glen Contrarian has pleasured himself to images of Betty White 153 times
Glen Contrarian has over 15,000 message board posts
Glen Contrarian once gave a reach around to a spider monkey

Clearly, some of this information is true, therefore the rest of the information can not be easily dismissed out-of-hand unless they can be SHOWN to be false.

Right? This is how logic works?

That spider monkey is lying!
 
if the first part of something is funded by 1 person and then given to another person who funds it instead... you can logically say they shared funding... since one did not pay at the beginning and other didn't pay the end; they both paid for a part of it... your argument is with logic and the english language.

Cool, but that isn't what happened.
 
Gary Johnson. I had no other realistic choice. I despised Hillary Clinton for maligning law enforcement and pushing a false narrative about white cops running around murdering innocent black men. And I had too much self-respect to vote for Donald Trump.

This Gary Johnson?



 
"Wife of demoted DOJ official worked for firm behind anti-Trump dossier"
So, Clarence Thomas, who voted on Bush v Gore, has a wife who was working on the Bush transition team and Scalia's son worked for the law firm representing Bush.

DO you think there was something shifty in the scenario that you just described?
 
Moderator's Warning:
The personal attacks will stop now, or there will be consequences. Stop talking about each other and discuss the OP. Moderation may still be pending for posts made before this in thread warning.
 
Re: Wife of demoted DOJ official worked for firm behind anti-Trump dossier

LoL!!

From your OP



From your link



So which one is it Fenton? You're cross examining your own bad arguments. At best the dossier was partially used as a lead for their investigation but was definitely not "presented to FISA as legitimate intelligence to obtain a FISA warrant".

The dossier was corroberated by the the guy who headed up the first Russia investigation, Peter Sztrok

Peter Sztrok is currently at the center of a IG probe into his conduct as a investigator in the first Russia investigation. This is also the same Peter Sztrok who was removed as head of the FBIs counter intelligence divsion and placed in human rescources.

According to a WaPo article from February, the FBI considered Christopher Steele to be credible and the dossier to be worthy of further further investigation even though the contents of the dossier were unproven.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ry.html?sw_bypass=true&utm_term=.7683a1710f80

Those are WaPo's words, not mine by the way. Steele met with Sztrok in July of 2016 to brief the FBI on the contents of the dossier. The FBI, who knew he worked for Fusion GPS and that this was opposition research funded by the Hillary campaign and the DNC, applied for its fist FISA warrant in the same month.
Over a years worth of investigations havent been able to corroberate the contents of the dossier, or offer up any evidence of collusion, but the FBI submitted their first FISA application almost immediately based on its contents.

That warrant was denied and a second FISA request was submitted in October. It was granted. The judge that just recused himself from the Flynn case sat on the FISA court...just sayin
 
Oh, but it does work around here. You see, you take spreading your bull**** very seriously.
Can you address the argument or not this is a simple yes or no question. if you can't then i understand.

I do not take you spreading your bull**** seriously at all. I make fun of you for it. Because this is the internet, where folks like you can get on a forum and spew nonsense and hope to be taken seriously. You think you are actually winning something, lol.

Typical liberal response when they can't come up with an actual rebuttal. also the irony of your statement is amazing since you haven't
actually addressed anything in your last 5 posts.

Don't get mad, sis.

Yet you are the one getting upset and not addressing what people say.
 
You are just running around the subject without addressing anything. Your post didn't even attempt to address the subjects in his posts. I noticed you have a super wide paint brush there. I take it that your favorite color might be rhetoric. Who did you vote for?

Typical left wing radical. they all have the same MO in posting.
it is amazing to sit back and watch them get all frazzled when you call them out on it.
 
"Wife of demoted DOJ official worked for firm behind anti-Trump dossier"
So, Clarence Thomas, who voted on Bush v Gore, has a wife who was working on the Bush transition team and Scalia's son worked for the law firm representing Bush.

Did the Bush FBI and DOJ use a GOP funded dossier as the basis to launch a investigation and obtain FISA warrants to surveill and unmask Al Gore's campaign staff ?
 
Can you address the argument or not this is a simple yes or no question. if you can't then i understand.



Typical liberal response when they can't come up with an actual rebuttal. also the irony of your statement is amazing since you haven't
actually addressed anything in your last 5 posts.



Yet you are the one getting upset and not addressing what people say.

Lol....I know Im on to something when literally every post from a Lib is either a personal attack and or unrelated blather.
 
An update !

Fusion GPS Confirms Hiring Nellie Ohr To Inve | The Daily Caller
" The co-founder of Trump dossier firm Fusion GPS confirmed in court filings on Tuesday that he met last year with Justice Department official Bruce Ohr and hired Ohr’s wife to help with the opposition research firm’s investigation of Donald Trump."

Here's a link to a copy of the actual court filing, just in case someone attacks the source
https://www.scribd.com/document/367...ft500noi&source=impactradius&medium=affiliate
 
If there is a sex tape made in Moscow I hope it never sees the day light. To watch D Trump in the nude is enough to make this gay boy go hetro !! Ewwww

But he drinks 12 Diet Cokes a day! And orders his staff to go get him 2000-calorie meals from McDonald's! And see how Melania is soooooo very cuddly and romantic towards him? Oh, wait....
 
Back
Top Bottom