'Over 10,000 texts' between ex-Mueller officials found, after discovery of anti-Trump messages

yankintx said:

Oh I provide cites, but I dont need a cite to call out an opinion, which is all you got.

Click to expand...

Your modus operandi here sees to be basically:

1) Invoke Hannity in a snarky matter whenever someone makes a post you dislike,
2) Use frequent logical fallacies and deny them.

yankintx said:

And you provided no cite to back up your claim. Were is it ?

Click to expand...

Where are cites to back up yours? You really should provide them before demanding them from others.

yankintx said:

Conflict of interest? You cut and paste straight off Hannitys website ?:lamo

Click to expand...

Provide the cite I quote from Hannity. Thanks.

Since you are the one invoking Hannity, then you need to show that Hannity is indeed relevant to the situation. You accused me of quoting him when I don't even watch his program.

worksforpigs said:

Where are cites to back up yours? You really should provide them before demanding them from others.



Provide the cite I quote from Hannity. Thanks.

Since you are the one invoking Hannity, then you need to show that Hannity is indeed relevant to the situation. You accused me of quoting him when I don't even watch his program.

Click to expand...

I don't watch Hannity either, but I've seen the relevant snippets of him saying that all Muellers investigators are biased and so forth. That's a serious charge and if made should be supported by evidence, and Hannity offered none, other than his own opinion. That charge has also been made here and not supported. One and only one investigator was found to be biased and he was promptly fired. If any others are biased, for or against Trump, they should be fired too. If you have any evidence of bias, by all means post it. This is an important issue. It's not enough to say, "They're all Hillary supporters" or "They're out to get Trump". You have to be able to back up your charges or risk looking like a partisan schill.

worksforpigs said:

Where did you get the idea that skepticism equals "worshiping at his altar"? You have a very bizarre, extremist vocabulary.

I would say when the deck is stacked with one's political opponents, it's a legitimate cause for objection.

Click to expand...

Kenneth Starr, special prosecutor for Bill Clinton, was a Republican. Were you equally concerned then?

worksforpigs said:

So if a bunch of FBI investigators going after Bernie Sanders were posting their hate of Bernie in texts and had a history of donating money to Bernie's opponents you would what?

Click to expand...

You can't infringe upon free association, nor can you do a political affiliation requirement for hiring citizen employees.

Mueller handled it right. The employees should've kept their political opinions to themselves.

Khayembii Communique said:

lol, it wasn't covered up at all. There's no obligation for Mueller to issue a press release surrounding everything going on in the investigation.

Click to expand...

Even if Mueller did release...info the Conservatives would say he was grandstanding. Conservatives only care about Conservatives....they will forgo the rule of law, they will elect a pedophile, they will elect a p$$y grabber in chief. They don't care about nothing but if a person has a R next to his name on a ballot

GDViking said:

During one yes, once they see the evidence.

Click to expand...

But that isn't what we are talking about here. This is a police officer with a long standing and provable dislike of a suspect being assigned to investigate a crime... or conversely, a police officer with a long standing adoration for a suspect being assigned to investigate a crime.

In both cases it isn't supposed to happen. Rule of thumb: If they would be kicked off a jury for a bias then they should recuse themselves.

If Mueller had kept him on the case then you would have an argument. He was let go an in Conservative terms it is a nothingburger.

I also remember Ken Starr when he was a special counsel he was appointed to look into White Water. That did not pan out and he finally had to go after him for having an affair and lying about it. I am sure the Conservatives at the time yelled from the mountain tops that it was a witch-hunt. I don't think so!....And lets be clear Starr and his crew leaked more crap than a 100 year old sewer line. Attacking the FBI, attacking the CIA, attacking the Judiciary, Republicans, Democrats, ....attacking his own attorney General, and Secretary of State. Pardon me if I do not think this lump of crap is going to make America great again.....!!!!!!