• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Seventh woman accuses Sen. Al Franken of trying to kiss her: Report

Once again, I love how you only care about sexual misconduct when it's coming from a Democrat.

Nevermind that "anonymous sources" were supposed to be a problem if a "liberal" entity relied on them.



"The aide, who has withheld her name, said...."
 
I will respond to whomever how I see fit. Even your illogical posts.

You aren't responding to me. You quoted my post to Maggie that referenced something she said, then you can't even follow along. Next time try to pay attention to my original post as well as the quoted post I am responding to, and you won't clog up the thread with this nonsense.
 
There is a little difference, though, between a seated Congressman harassing women and something Trump may have done years ago. As for Republican running, he should have been forced to step down.

Most of Franken's misdeeds so far were before he was a Senator. Now, I think he should resign, but if that's going to be the standard applied...
 
You aren't responding to me. You quoted my post to Maggie that referenced something she said, then you can't even follow along. Next time try to pay attention to my original post as well as the quoted post I am responding to, and you won't clog up the thread with this nonsense.



blah blah blah blah. if we wanted to not clog up the thread with nonsense, you would remember silence is golden my friend.



See, as I predicted. I post facts and you have your typical meltdown.
 
This is before Trump endorsed him. The entire point is that they originally condemned him and now are falling in line. So this article is really confirming the point more than anything. My question was clearly about who has come out against him now. The only one I can think of is Flake.



I am not arguing that the party has reluctantly backed him at all. That said. I am not sure what high ground the other side, yours thinks it's on now.
 
blah blah blah blah. if we wanted to not clog up the thread with nonsense, you would remember silence is golden my friend.



See, as I predicted. I post facts and you have your typical meltdown.

Let me know when you post something other than a troll post, Reverend. It will be a day of celebration.
 
I am not arguing that the party has reluctantly backed him at all. That said. I am not sure what high ground the other side, yours thinks it's on now.

You said numerous republicans came out against him. Can you point to any that are actually still against him now?
 
You said numerous republicans came out against him. Can you point to any that are actually still against him now?

what does that even mean? If someone pulled their support of Franken the day the story broke, they don't have to come out each week of his scandal and remind everyone that they pulled their support. Many members of Senate pulled their support for Moore as soon as this all started. Is it up to us to remind you of each individual? That's why god gave you google.

use it.
 
I post on topic, you screech, and do everything you can to avoid an intellectual discussion. Who's the troll?

You can call anyone you want a troll.

I was happier when I didn't read your posts. I didn't miss anything. Posting with you is a waste of time. Have a good day.
 
You can call anyone you want a troll.

I was happier when I didn't read your posts. I didn't miss anything. Posting with you is a waste of time. Have a good day.



I didn't call anyone a troll, I simply asked you a question based on your accusation vs your own behavior.


Are you running away as usual? I'm shocked I tells ya! Shocked! :pimpdaddy:
 
After years and years and years of supporting Bill Clinton and numerous other men whom they knew were sexual predators.

The Roy Moore thing will take care of itself in time anyway. Elect him and replace him if this proves to be true. Simple.

Bill Clinton was impeached by the House, with votes affirming from both parties. Hardly a support of the man...
 
Bill Clinton was impeached by the House, with votes affirming from both parties. Hardly a support of the man...

And he continued to serve the rest of his term, then was heralded like a god for years after he left by Democrats everywhere while they lectured conservatives about being too prudish about sex.

I remember it well. Clinton was Weinstein times a thousand.
 
what does that even mean? If someone pulled their support of Franken the day the story broke, they don't have to come out each week of his scandal and remind everyone that they pulled their support. Many members of Senate pulled their support for Moore as soon as this all started. Is it up to us to remind you of each individual? That's why god gave you google.

use it.

It's means those repubs who pulled their support pulled a 180 and now support him.
 
Franken should do a debate style show with bill oreilly. Ratings would be through the roof.
 
Back
Top Bottom