• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

It's impossible for Trump to 'obstruct justice,' his lawyer says

I think the tweets would be presented as a letter, an email, or any other legitimate form of correspondence. A court might finally teach the president that hyperbole, lying, bragging, exaggeration, and insulting all have consequences in the real world.

Any tweet, any text message or email will stand up.

I imagine Trump's lawyers have begged him to stay off of his twitter account, and he hasn't listened to anyone. I think his is issue, is that all of his life he has been able to buy his way out of problems. Like settling for 25 Million dollars for Federal Racketering charges on Trump University, and now he has found that he is not going to "pay his way" out of this one. It's nothing but arrogant ignorance. He implicates himself all of the time.
 
Nope, I agree with prometeus. You have no idea what you are talking about.

The president isn't a defendant. He is not party to a trial. There is no discovery. You are thoroughly clueless.


Really--Trump is not a party to any "prosecturial investigation? I believe that's why they refer to Mueller as the special Prosecutor.
Wash. Post: Mueller investigating Trump for obstruction - CNNPolitics
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...tigating-trump-obstruction-justice/102865928/
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/06/14/mueller-trump-obstruction-justice-239574
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...28ba60fbb98_story.html?utm_term=.2a82dfdf4ceb

Now it's totally understandable that you wouldn't know that Trump is under investigation for Obstruction of Justice and has been since May of 2017, when Robert Mueller was appointed as special prosecutor. Because you're watching FOX NEWS.

And this is the manner in which they reported on 3 Federal Grand Jury indictments and 1 guilty plea.



And again it did not help Trump that he decided to go on an NBC interview with Lester Holt and admit that he fired Comey over the Russian investigation.



The prosecutor is required to hand over sworn testimony, and other evidence to the legal defense lawyers--so they can mount a defense for the defendent and see what's coming at them. Albiet--that Mueller will not indict Trump, he will hand over all his evidence, including what Trump's lawyer's have returned to him, to the house, and they will decide Trump's fate.

Republicans are left with 2 options:
1. Remove Trump from office asap or
2. Burn down the entire party in 2018-2020 & beyond.

If Republicans can do 8 investigations into Benghazi and endless talks about emails, it's not hard to imagine what Democrats will do with Treason, Obstruction & Lies when they take over in 2018. You'll also get a great education into what that Emoluments clause in the constitution is all about, which is also a reason for impeachment, if Democrats don't want to go along with the current setup.
 
Last edited:
Really--Trump is not a party to any "prosecturial investigation? I believe that's why they refer to Mueller as the special Prosecutor.
Wash. Post: Mueller investigating Trump for obstruction - CNNPolitics
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...tigating-trump-obstruction-justice/102865928/
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/06/14/mueller-trump-obstruction-justice-239574
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...28ba60fbb98_story.html?utm_term=.2a82dfdf4ceb

Now it's totally understandable that you wouldn't know that Trump is under investigation for Obstruction of Justice and has been since May of 2017, when Robert Mueller was appointed as special prosecutor. Because you're watching FOX NEWS.

And this is the manner in which they reported on 3 Federal Grand Jury indictments and 1 guilty plea.



And again it did not help Trump that he decided to go on an NBC interview with Lester Holt and admit that he fired Comey over the Russian investigation.



The prosecutor is required to hand over sworn testimony, and other evidence to the legal defense lawyers--so they can mount a defense for the defendent and see what's coming at them. Albiet--that Mueller will not indict Trump, he will hand over all his evidence, including what Trump's lawyer's have returned to him, to the house, and they will decide Trump's fate.


Um, slow your roll.

Read the special counsel's assignment letter.

Once again, the president is neither a defendant in any related legal action nor is he the principal subject of the special counsel's ongoing investigation.

I would like to help you understand, but I think you need a very elementary lesson that you should seek yourself.

By the way, your snarky references to Fox News do not apply to me. If you bothered to check with whom you are speaking you would realize that we generally agree but that you are ignorant of facts and processes.
 
Um, slow your roll.

Read the special counsel's assignment letter.

Once again, the president is neither a defendant in any related legal action nor is he the principal subject of the special counsel's ongoing investigation.

I would like to help you understand, but I think you need a very elementary lesson that you should seek yourself.

By the way, your snarky references to Fox News do not apply to me. If you bothered to check with whom you are speaking you would realize that we generally agree but that you are ignorant of facts and processes.

The entire Rebellion is the target, but THE HATCHET MAN FOR THE ELITE CLASS cant finish the job without getting Trumps scalp.
 
The entire Rebellion is the target, but THE HATCHET MAN FOR THE ELITE CLASS cant finish the job without getting Trumps scalp.

Read your writings at a later date and reflect on their meaning and substance. Hint: They have none.
 
Read your writings at a later date and reflect on their meaning and substance. Hint: They have none.

Listen or dont listen, the choice is always yours.

Either way I know what I know.

I am nicer too.
 
Listen or dont listen, the choice is always yours.

Either way I know what I know.

I am nicer too.

I don't doubt at all that you're a nice person. Your posts, though, indicate a deep partisan lean, insistence on fallacies, and intolerance of other-minded people.
 
Back
Top Bottom