- Joined
- Oct 25, 2017
- Messages
- 11,506
- Reaction score
- 3,207
- Location
- Colorado, USA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
I'm a male?
What are you trying to say? Use your words.
I'm a male?
What are you trying to say? Use your words.
I'll provide you with a picture.
The taller one would be me. The shorter would be one of my twin boys.
I WANT lots of grandchildren. But that ain'a'gonna happen if the lads are scared to come on to girls.
Effeminate men can come on to women. Men who are not effeminate can come on to women too.
None of them may force themselves upon a woman without her consent. It's really simple.
That's part of what I'm saying. It's a cultural problem. People need to learn and practice impulse control. We also need to get rid of the concept that "boys will be boys" and not excuse bad behavior at any age.
I haven't heard that concept being touting, even when I was a child. I think the last time I even noticed it, was in an old rerun of leaving to beaver.
So either your living in the past, of the town you're in never grew out of the 1950s.
The people who do these things are either sick in the head, or they have had power for a large portion of their lives and believe they can get away with it. "Boys will be boys" has no impact on this whatsoever.
Well, that's your opinion. Spend five minutes in a frat house (today, not in the 1950s) and then tell me that "boys will be boys" does not contribute to a problem where men act sexually inappropriately toward women.
Been through college and lived in the frat house. I personally know its not a problem.
Two other frats on campus, with no problems accept for one claim of sexual assault in late winter and that one was revealed to be her trying to get revenge on him after they broke up.
So forgive me if the only experience I've even remotely got with sexual assault, was a complete lie.
You had three frats and no one ever misbehaved? Congratulations!
We have three dozen frats and train our brothers quarterly because they are prone to make mistakes.
As humans tend to make mistakes, yes.
Do you have a point? Mine is that people shouldn't touch other people who don't give consent to being touched.
We're getting lots of stories on this sexual harassment, they are each quite different. Weinstein's misdeeds apparently were ongoing and went on for decades, seem to involve coercion, Rose's were similar and as contemporary. Moore's decried conduct doesn't involve coercion, but there's this age difference, which is likely an element in the Weinstein and Rose cases since these are old guys, but we don't know Moore is still at it and it could be that the Moore claims are politically motivated. Then there's the Franken cases, less coercion, but apparently more unconsensual.
All of this is unacceptable, but some is worse, dating a teenager when you're twice her age is problematic, but doesn't seem as bad as grabbing a woman's breasts as she sleeps and getting your picture taken for fun, forcing a woman to sit on your lap as a condition to get a job is worse than trolling the mall leering at jailbait thirty years ago.
Apparently this sort of misconduct is much more common than we knew, it makes me wonder whether there are any competent women who don't owe their jobs to some degrading conduct.
Hadn’t figured the fascination of millennials (Twitter) to be some sort of censoring advocate for sexism, this must be a mistake.Ronan Farrow’s explosive exposé on Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein’s decades of rampant sexual misconduct (everything from basic sexism, to predatory behavior and accusations of rape) has created a firestorm among feminists and thrown a substantial new log on the already raging fire known as the War on Women. When actress Rose McGowan had the audacity to be an outspoken woman on Twitter and called out Weinstein (as well as Ben Affleck) for their roles in Hollywood misogyny, Twitter suspended her account. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entr...-escalating-fight_us_59e4f1b5e4b003f928d5e8d9
So then we get a bunch of liberals denouncing Trump and other deplorables for enabling the predations of a bunch of liberals.It’s important to remember allegations against Weinstein have nothing to do with party politics, where allegations against President Donald Trump dominated and continue to dominate the national political dialogue because the way our president and elected representatives view women affects us all. But where Weinstein is concerned, revelations against the influential Hollywood producer speak to an issue that transcends politics -that is, whether or not we as a society trust and respect women. And as dismal as this may sound, the dark reality is that we continually fail to. There’s no shortage of people and historical traditions to blame for this, but the decades-long Republican war on women is one starting point.
There are a lot of reasons that women who experience sexual harassment and assault don’t come forward. A crucial one is that despite the exhaustiveness of the reporting process, many cases often go dismissed or are swept under the rug. This is exponentially more likely when the assailant is male, wealthy and powerful. Weinstein and Trump may not be united by party, but they are united by the extent to which male privilege (in a society built on the social and political disenfranchisement of women) has allowed them to act without consequences. You Do Uterus: The Republican War on Women helped make Harvey Weinstein | Daily Trojan
We're going to need a new subforum before this is over.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/inve...e-450pm:homepage/story&utm_term=.300a7d57a1a7
Other links in case you don't have access to the WaPo one.
Charlie Rose sexual harassment - Business Insider
Charlie Rose Accused By 8 Women Of ‘Unwanted Sexual Advances’: Report | Deadline
I'm no longer surprised by any of this. It's got to be rampant in these types of industries.