• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

How a conservative group dealt with a fondling charge against a rising GOP star

JANFU

Land by the Gulf Stream
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Dec 27, 2014
Messages
59,416
Reaction score
38,988
Location
Best Coast Canada
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Liberal
New spelling for hypocrite- Tony Perkins. President of Family Research Council since 2003.
The Member, Rep Wes Goodman of the Legislature resigned.

Now what about Perkins, he promised to address this and covered it up.
Wonder how Republicans will react to his covering this up.


Will the FRC fire him? Clearly they should

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...689a9f2d84e_story.html?utm_term=.6f5802e233e9

Hours later, upstairs in a hotel guest room, an 18-year-old college student who had come to the event with his parents said the candidate unzipped his pants and fondled him in the middle of the night. The frightened teenager fled the room and told his mother and stepfather, who demanded action from the head of the organization hosting the conference.

“If we endorse these types of individuals, then it would seem our whole weekend together was nothing more than a charade,” the stepfather wrote to Tony Perkins, president of the Council for National Policy.

“Trust me . . . this will not be ignored nor swept aside,” replied Perkins, who also heads the Family Research Council, a prominent evangelical activist group. “It will be dealt with swiftly, but with prudence.”

https://www.cfnp.org/page.aspx?pid=180
WE BELIEVE the Founding Fathers created this nation based upon Judeo-Christian values and that our culture flourishes when we uphold them.

Family Research Council
Homosexuality

Family Research Council believes that homosexual conduct is harmful to the persons who engage in it and to society at large, and can never be affirmed. It is by definition unnatural, and as such is associated with negative physical and psychological health effects. While the origins of same-sex attractions may be complex, there is no convincing evidence that a homosexual identity is ever something genetic or inborn. We oppose the vigorous efforts of homosexual activists to demand that homosexuality be accepted as equivalent to heterosexuality in law, in the media, and in schools. Attempts to join two men or two women in "marriage" constitute a radical redefinition and falsification of the institution, and FRC supports state and federal constitutional amendments to prevent such redefinition by courts or legislatures. Sympathy must be extended to those who struggle with unwanted same-sex attractions, and every effort should be made to assist such persons to overcome those attractions, as many already have.
 
Last edited:
New spelling for hypocrite- Tony Perkins. President of Family Research Council since 2003.
The Member, Rep Wes Goodman of the Legislature resigned.

Now what about Perkins, he promised to address this and covered it up.
Wonder how Republicans will react to his covering this up.


Will the FRC fire him? Clearly they should

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...689a9f2d84e_story.html?utm_term=.6f5802e233e9



https://www.cfnp.org/page.aspx?pid=180


Family Research Council

The first article is behind a pay wall for me, but was the charge admitted to? Or, is it just another unsubstantiated charge?

And, we're talking about an 18 year old, who, according to our laws is now a man -- not a kid. Why would any man run frightened from a room? And, why was he in that room with the other man to begin with? And, why did he allow the other man to unzip his pants?

We're hearing so many stories lately that result in more questions than answers.

Many of the accusations coming down the pipe seem odd, indeed.
 
We're finding out the truth about some of these social conservatives who claim to be christians with strong family values. A good share of theme are closet fags and even pedophiles. Wonder why these guys claim to like children and believe in large families? Now we know why. ;)
 
The first article is behind a pay wall for me, but was the charge admitted to? Or, is it just another unsubstantiated charge?

And, we're talking about an 18 year old, who, according to our laws is now a man -- not a kid. Why would any man run frightened from a room? And, why was he in that room with the other man to begin with? And, why did he allow the other man to unzip his pants?

We're hearing so many stories lately that result in more questions than answers.

Many of the accusations coming down the pipe seem odd, indeed.

He was sleeping. Not the point now. It was reported, then covered up by Perkins. And we can see Perkins is President of Family Research Council, and linked their position on Homosexuality. Hypocrite that he is.

Ohio Lawmaker Quits After Having 'Inappropriate Conduct' With Man In His Office

Note the info FNews leaves out
As to a pay wall- clear your history. I also us CCleaner.
Wes Goodman, Ohio state rep, quits over reported 'inappropriate behavior' with male | Fox News
 
New spelling for hypocrite- Tony Perkins. President of Family Research Council since 2003.
The Member, Rep Wes Goodman of the Legislature resigned.

Now what about Perkins, he promised to address this and covered it up.
Wonder how Republicans will react to his covering this up.


Will the FRC fire him? Clearly they should

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...689a9f2d84e_story.html?utm_term=.6f5802e233e9



https://www.cfnp.org/page.aspx?pid=180


Family Research Council



The hypocrisy you present knows no political bounds. As long as sexual harassment and assault is presented politically, the perpetrators win.
 
The hypocrisy you present knows no political bounds. As long as sexual harassment and assault is presented politically, the perpetrators win.

My hypocrisy? Care to explain?
 
My hypocrisy? Care to explain?



You present the hypocrisy of others. I never said hypocrisy was on you. Never. What did I say that made you feel being made a hypocrite?
 
You present the hypocrisy of others. I never said hypocrisy was on you. Never. What did I say that made you feel being made a hypocrite?

Nope- I slammed Franken, as well as Moore.
So no political bias or hypocrisy here.
 
Back
Top Bottom