• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Florida Democratic Chair resigns after sexual harassment claims

NeverTrump

Exposing GOP since 2015
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Messages
25,357
Reaction score
11,557
Location
Post-Trump America
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
Wow - what a concept. A politician is caught in a sex scandal, and he actually does the honorable thing, and resigns?

What is this world coming to?!?!

*hair's on fire*
 
The difference is that the Republicans rightfully defend themselves. The Dems cave.

Are you saying its right to defend a pedophile?
 
Are you saying its right to defend a pedophile?


Not me saying so. It's the law. The term "defending a pedophile" is a statement that assumes the defendant is guilty. Versus your thinking is what's called "the law".
 

There is a revolution and women are sick to death of of being harassed. Congress should strengthen the laws, and allow Non Disclosures where they can be used in subsequent harassment claims against that abuser and or Company.
Next is for Congress to strengthen laws that protect the average worker who is also harassed.
 
Not me saying so. It's the law. The term "defending a pedophile" is a statement that assumes the defendant is guilty. Versus your thinking is what's called "the law".

And the Statute of Limitations has been exceed. So you know full well that he cannot be charged or sued.
Perhaps having no SoL on child molestation would be the answer. Your opinion on that is?
 
Men, I would advise you not to even look at a woman. Do not talk, look at or even think about a woman.

And women, if someone says something you 'don't like' ****ing say something to the person. By staying silent, you are only encouraging the behavior.
 
Men, I would advise you not to even look at a woman. Do not talk, look at or even think about a woman.

And women, if someone says something you 'don't like' ****ing say something to the person. By staying silent, you are only encouraging the behavior.



1. I'm glad I don't have to worry about dating anymore.

2. That's not to say there isn't a real problem. This thread may be about "inappropriate comments", but holy **** have you seen some of the weirdly perverted crap some of these people have been accused of?




Dry humping actresses' legs, whacking off at various actresses/comedians, etc., child molestation / statutory rape, etc etc etc. I think we should be careful about getting anywhere near discounting the issue.

Seems there are either (1) a huge group of utterly unconnected psychotic liars who suddenly tell their lies at the same time, or (2) a whole bunch of assaultive twisted male perverts out there.

I think one happens to be a bit more likely than the other, shall we say....
 
Not me saying so. It's the law. The term "defending a pedophile" is a statement that assumes the defendant is guilty. Versus your thinking is what's called "the law".

This isn't a judicial court. Funny how that works... when someone from the opposition gets accused it's "guilty" time but when it's from someones own side, then we need to wait and see and wait for the court case and all of the following appeals before they wish to exercise their first amendment rights in a political forum.
 
1. I'm glad I don't have to worry about dating anymore.

2. That's not to say there isn't a real problem. This thread may be about "inappropriate comments", but holy **** have you seen some of the weirdly perverted crap some of these people have been accused of?




Dry humping actresses' legs, whacking off at various actresses/comedians, etc., child molestation / statutory rape, etc etc etc. I think we should be careful about getting anywhere near discounting the issue.

Seems there are either (1) a huge group of utterly unconnected psychotic liars who suddenly tell their lies at the same time, or (2) a whole bunch of assaultive twisted male perverts out there.

I think one happens to be a bit more likely than the other, shall we say....

The only actions here that are new under the sun is finally accepting the words of the accusers.
 
Men, I would advise you not to even look at a woman. Do not talk, look at or even think about a woman.

And women, if someone says something you 'don't like' ****ing say something to the person. By staying silent, you are only encouraging the behavior.

Old saying about harassment- it is only harassment if the other person does not like- Lot of truth in that.
 
And the Statute of Limitations has been exceed. So you know full well that he cannot be charged or sued.
Perhaps having no SoL on child molestation would be the answer. Your opinion on that is?

In Alabama, if there had been intercourse, there would have been no statue of limitations. However, it was just second degree sexual misconduct.
 
Back
Top Bottom