- Joined
- Mar 9, 2017
- Messages
- 22,102
- Reaction score
- 13,500
- Location
- Ontario, Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
Two comments on that. Money cannot make up for population control. Ultimately, sustainable populations is an ecologic issue without monetary solution; there is no alternative to culling. Trophies themselves account for little if any of the hunt price. The villagers, or anyone else, could care less about taking animal parts, they're of no value to the village. After all, can't sell ivory.
Trophies will not increase hunting or the price of individual hunts. There's no value added, for locals, by allowing trophies. What trophies will do is open the black market. Before, there was no way to export ivory. No way to transport it. No way to sell it. No way to even have it. All of that is illegal. The reason that market was eliminated was to reduce poaching. When someone cannot gain from poaching, what's the point?
Trophies will increase poaching by opening the market. When goods flow legally, there is opportunity for fake trophy permits, piggy-backing and other methods of transporting and selling illegally obtained ivory. Will the increase in poaching be significant? That remains to be seen. Are we gonna take that risk so that someone can have a trophy? Looks like it.
I hear you, and I would share the same concerns...my comment was more directed towards the folks who think there should be no hunt at all. If it is well thought out, though, I think trophies could be easily managed, and drive added value, or ROI, to the hunt. Simply creating a registry of each trophy (wouldn't be that large, given the cost to hunt trophy animals) coming from an endangered species would enable us to identify legitimately acquired trophies. Adding a hefty trophy fee would route more money into conservation / protection, as well as into local villages. The important thing is to make it work FOR conservation FIRST.
Of course, that's in my perfect world...hehe...we'll see how it rolls out.