• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Volvo Pulls its Ads from Hannity after Moore Civerage

apdst said:
Not really, since Keurig seems to have gotten the message.
Click to expand...

And those people destroyed their Keurigs :lamo Like I said, Hannity supporters that destroyed their Keurigs just showed what morons they were for supporting Hannity. Seriously, who destroys a product THEY ALREADY PAID FOR to boycott a company? Answer is....morons.
 
Praxas said:
No, there were accusations only.
Click to expand...

Comey went public with the evidence. In fact, there's more evidence against Clinton than there is against Roy Moore.
 
In which case, Bannon is going to have to invest in doing more and better research on candidates, before backing them.

This could also be a good time to have Trump send Sessions back to his Alabama senate seat, to allow the appointment of a better Attorney General who can dismiss the special prosecutor and reclaim jurisdiction over any charges of Russia meddling.
 
Captain Adverse said:
Actually you have no point. It is just emotional appeal.

I don't know about Canada, have never studied it's laws. But if I didn't believe in the principle of innocent until proven guilty I would never have studied to become a Public Defender.

Essentially Hannity wasn't "defending" anyone. He was simply pointing out both a fact of our justice system, and the ideal behind it. Which should be applied to anyone accused.

Rushing to judgement is the problem here. An accusation is merely that, a claim someone did something. However, an accusation is not "proof," and it is up to the accuser to prove their allegations.
Click to expand...

Fortunately or unfortunately, we are dealing here in the court of public opinion, not a court of law. The rules are vastly different, as you already know.
 
apdst said:
Comey went public with the evidence. In fact, there's more evidence against Clinton than there is against Roy Moore.
Click to expand...

And the evidence didn't show any illegal activity. And no, there is TONS more against Moore. Even Hannity is rethinking his support of Moore.
 
Captain Adverse said:
Hmmm....

Volvo pulls its ads from Hannity after Moore coverage | TheHill

My what a truly horrible person this Sean Hannity is. :wow:

Daring to state what should be the basic moral viewpoint when allegations of crime or other misconduct are raised against anyone...that a person deserves the presumption of innocence.

Yep, that dastardly ideal, so blatantly advocated by this man proves he deserves all of our derision, disgust, and censure.

By all means, campaign to silence this kind of foolish idealism. That's the New Left American way, only truth and justice for the accusers...to hell with the accused. :coffeepap:

(Edit: For those who can't see...that was HEAVY sarcasm. ;) )
Click to expand...

You know, I do respect you, Cap'n, but sometimes your generalizations leave a lot to be desired. You can use all the "HEAVY sarcasm" you like, but to suggest that this is the sole territory of the Left either implies stupidity (which I don't believe) or willful omission of the Right's own track record. Either way you lost credibility with this one. I guess "This is the new American way" would be too honest to expect.
 
MaggieD said:
A system working like it should. It’s about time.
Click to expand...

What system is that? The targeting of conservative voices by billionaires using propaganda and dishonest tactics? You support this?
 
Praxas said:
And the evidence didn't show any illegal activity. And no, there is TONS more against Moore. Even Hannity is rethinking his support of Moore.
Click to expand...

There's no physical evidence against Moore. There were 110 emails containing classified material on Clinton's unsecured server.

Your double standard is why no one wants to side with you all against Roy Moore.
 
I suspect McConnell and the gang knew there was something dark and indefensible in Moore's history and they let Trump know he needed to support Luther.
 
So one has to wonder if the attacks on hannity by media matters which resulted in volvo, kerug, and realtor.com to all oddly post a tweet stating they would not advertise to have within 24hrs all three pulling that back was not part of a coordinated effort by brock, and inside people at these companies.



This is all part of the alt-lefts MO. Someone can say something obvious like;

“Every single person in this country deserves the presumption of innocence,” Hannity said. “With the allegations against Judge Moore, none of us know the truth of what happened 38 years ago. The only people that would know are the people involved in this incident.” The Fox News host added that Moore “should step aside and leave the Senate race” if the allegations are true."


And if that person is not a leftist, talking about another leftist, a statement like this is viewed as disgusting, wrong, and that person should be silences, lose his job and be made a pariah.


There was a litany of accusers for Bill Clinton, where his wife set up a war room to attack his accusers. How did the left treat that vs the way they are treating moore? It's sick and transparent that the use of the victims of moore are being used as a bat against people like hannity, who in this case has taken the objective rational position. hannity may be outrageous and insanely wrong at times, this is not one of them.
 
apdst said:
There's no physical evidence against Moore. There were 110 emails containing classified material on Clinton's unsecured server.

Your double standard is why no one wants to side with you all against Roy Moore.
Click to expand...

Hey, you want to support a man who sexually assaulted a 14 and 16 year, be my guest. There are tons of evidence in the fact he was even banned from a mall for his creepy behavior. And no, the evidence from the server did not indicate anything illegal. I know the "illegal" part is hard for you to understand.

and his polling is slipping daily, so it seems more people side with ME than with you and supporting sexual assault of minors.
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
So one has to wonder if the attacks on hannity by media matters which resulted in volvo, kerug, and realtor.com to all oddly post a tweet stating they would not advertise to have within 24hrs all three pulling that back was not part of a coordinated effort by brock, and inside people at these companies.



This is all part of the alt-lefts MO. Someone can say something obvious like;

“Every single person in this country deserves the presumption of innocence,” Hannity said. “With the allegations against Judge Moore, none of us know the truth of what happened 38 years ago. The only people that would know are the people involved in this incident.” The Fox News host added that Moore “should step aside and leave the Senate race” if the allegations are true."


And if that person is not a leftist, talking about another leftist, a statement like this is viewed as disgusting, wrong, and that person should be silences, lose his job and be made a pariah.


There was a litany of accusers for Bill Clinton, where his wife set up a war room to attack his accusers. How did the left treat that vs the way they are treating moore? It's sick and transparent that the use of the victims of moore are being used as a bat against people like hannity, who in this case has taken the objective rational position. hannity may be outrageous and insanely wrong at times, this is not one of them.
Click to expand...

Thank you for demonstrating your hypocrisy since you claimed Bill Clinton was a rapist not even a few comments ago. When was Bill Clinton convicted for Rape? Oh yeah, he wasn't.
 
Praxas said:
No, that would be the rapist Trump and Moore right now. You know, the president you support and most likely the candidate you support.
Click to expand...



That's stupid. I support some of the things trump has done, I don't support much of the other things he's done. He's far to statist for me. I didn't vote for him, nor would I.


Rapist trump? who did trump rape?


Your guy who you would vote for today if he ran raped:

Juanita Broaddrick
Paula Jones
Kathleen Willey


And the witch with a capital "B" you voted for protected him by setting up a war room to attack victims of her husbands rapestick.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/a...llary_do_--_and_why_did_she_do_it_129787.html
 
Praxas said:
Thank you for demonstrating your hypocrisy since you claimed Bill Clinton was a rapist not even a few comments ago. When was Bill Clinton convicted for Rape? Oh yeah, he wasn't.
Click to expand...


I think Moore's guilty too. I'm not hannity. Hannity has the objective opinion.


so's mine tho. I think they are both guilty.


:failpail:
your bucket runeth over.
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
That's stupid. I support some of the things trump has done, I don't support much of the other things he's done. He's far to statist for me. I didn't vote for him, nor would I.


Rapist trump? who did trump rape?


Your guy who you would vote for today if he ran raped:

Juanita Broaddrick
Paula Jones
Kathleen Willey


And the witch with a capital "B" you voted for protected him by setting up a war room to attack victims of her husbands rapestick.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/a...llary_do_--_and_why_did_she_do_it_129787.html
Click to expand...

you support Trump through and through and even Moore as well. Sad that you support sexual assault of minors.

And I didn't vote for Bill Clinton, so you lose again.
 
ReverendHellh0und said:
So one has to wonder if the attacks on hannity by media matters which resulted in volvo, kerug, and realtor.com to all oddly post a tweet stating they would not advertise to have within 24hrs all three pulling that back was not part of a coordinated effort by brock, and inside people at these companies.



This is all part of the alt-lefts MO. Someone can say something obvious like;

“Every single person in this country deserves the presumption of innocence,” Hannity said. “With the allegations against Judge Moore, none of us know the truth of what happened 38 years ago. The only people that would know are the people involved in this incident.” The Fox News host added that Moore “should step aside and leave the Senate race” if the allegations are true."


And if that person is not a leftist, talking about another leftist, a statement like this is viewed as disgusting, wrong, and that person should be silences, lose his job and be made a pariah.


There was a litany of accusers for Bill Clinton, where his wife set up a war room to attack his accusers. How did the left treat that vs the way they are treating moore? It's sick and transparent that the use of the victims of moore are being used as a bat against people like hannity, who in this case has taken the objective rational position. hannity may be outrageous and insanely wrong at times, this is not one of them.
Click to expand...

How did media matters suddenly get so much influence? I saw some of that Hannity rant, so what? It's not like the interview wasn't all over the news. Blaming Media Matters is just Hannity's standard foil.
Wasn't Hannity one of many who called for boycotts against others?


Hannity shares call to target Maddow's advertisers | TheHill
That was easy
 
OlNate said:
You know, I do respect you, Cap'n, but sometimes your generalizations leave a lot to be desired. You can use all the "HEAVY sarcasm" you like, but to suggest that this is the sole territory of the Left either implies stupidity (which I don't believe) or willful omission of the Right's own track record. Either way you lost credibility with this one. I guess "This is the new American way" would be too honest to expect.
Click to expand...

Ah, but you are reading too much into it.

I support the presumption of innocence despite which side of the political spectrum is pushing the guilty until proven innocent ideal.

Were the Right in the ascendant in the court of public opinion and using such tactics successfully I would point out "the New Right" yadda yadda... ;)

However, IMO the Left is ascendant, and has seriously lost its way via Third-Wave Feminism, SJW Ideology, and Antifas/BAMN extremism. All encouraged by the MSM and internet news to get "views" and "hits" for profit.
 
Last edited:
This is just part of a constant attack by Media Matters to try and silence any opposition. All these companies were contacted and pressured by them to drop the ads, which is what they do all day, every day. The second that they think they can capitalize on anything, they swing into action with their smear tactics. Truly a loathsome group of people, I can't imagine working for such a place. I have heard that they are a tax exempt organization, which is really hard to believe.
 
Praxas said:
you support Trump through and through and even Moore as well. Sad that you support sexual assault of minors.

And I didn't vote for Bill Clinton, so you lose again.
Click to expand...



You would, and you did for hillary. So by your logic, you support rape. That's sick bro.


I literally just posted that Moore was as bad as bill clintion. Look one post up. I said they were most likely both quilty and I will add they are scum.



I disagree with trump on things like the war on drugs, his tax plan doesn't go far enough, his wall wont solve anything, that's off the top of my head.
 
CletusWilbury said:
How did media matters suddenly get so much influence? I saw some of that Hannity rant, so what? It's not like the interview wasn't all over the news. Blaming Media Matters is just Hannity's standard foil.
Wasn't Hannity one of many who called for boycotts against others?


Hannity shares call to target Maddow's advertisers | TheHill
That was easy
Click to expand...





The whole thing started when a MM agent tweeted to keruig and the response given. It was a hook that worked.



as for your link. right on hannity's page:

"Retweets, Follows NOT endorsements!"


He shared a story, didn't call for a targeting or a boycott.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom