- Joined
- Dec 31, 2016
- Messages
- 11,375
- Reaction score
- 2,650
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Is this some sort of deflection on your part. I asked you a direct question and your completely avoiding it. The overwhelming scientific community that you all like to hang your hat on has an overwhelming credability problem when nothing they have predicted in the past has happened nor can they show any verifiable evidence that what they are guessing is resonsible for the conditions that they think we should be alarmed about.
So again i ask you to answer my question and then tell me what facts you think im trying to avoid argueing.
If you intend on presenting suppositions as facts i can do that too.
Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
There is no credibility problem with the overall scientists. I would urge you to read National Climate Assessment.
Overview | National Climate Assessment
First, let's look at the folks involved in the NCA:
A team of more than 300 experts guided by a 60-member Federal Advisory Committee produced the report, which was extensively reviewed by the public and experts, including federal agencies and a panel of the National Academy of Sciences.
And NO, your claim is unwarranted, that the predictions haven't happened. If anything, the scientific models have been too conservative.
It is notable that as these data records have grown longer and climate models have become more comprehensive, earlier predictions have largely been confirmed. The only real surprises have been that some changes, such as sea level rise and Arctic sea ice decline, have outpaced earlier projections.