• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Gowdy: Former UN Ambassador Samantha Power claims others unmasked in her name

LOL This such a crock it isn't funny. Why don't you read what Clapper had to say in front of Congress...Perhaps you don't even know what unmasking is or why it is done.



https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/05/08/clapper_1934_american_citizens_names__were_unmasked_in_2016.html

Clapper already lied about NSA ability to listen to phone conversations, why are there any expectations he is telling the truth under oath this time? One more lie when you already got away with a previous one eh?
 
Actually there's been a update ! Susan Powers over 260 unmasking request were not made by her, or so she testified.

Someone, used her name and security clearance to make those request, and thats not only illegal, but it throws a wrench into the whole " it was done for legitmate National security reasons " excuse we've been hearing since this story broke.

zzz...

Give it a rest. You sound like a spent out broken record.
 
zzz...

Give it a rest. You sound like a spent out broken record.

No can do. Someone has to post these threads or the forum will turn into one big Trump bashing circle jerk.

If you dont like it, I suggest you stop supporting and defending low life Politicians who use their Political positions to enrich themselves
 
Gowdy?....That Hill Billy hack?....Nobody cares about his non sense

Talk about nonsense, that's what your post is. Most people don't want to be called to his committee.
 
"these unmaskings were illegal and the surveillance associated wirh them carried out for Political purposes"

Hard to imagine that it was anything else but. Obama was apparently quite fond of using all the national intelligence services and resources on just about everyone, especially political enemies and political opponents, the stuff that dictators typically do.

Leftwingers don't care about lawlessness as long as it furthers liberalism. The ends justify the means.
 
???

You want me to believe "Clapper"???

Besides, he's BSing and you believe him.

First of all, Power supposedly unmasked HUNDREDS of names. Now we find out it wasn't her who did the unmasking. That means SOMEONE broke the law.

Second, if those unmasked intel reports are included in the PDB, THAT report is available to dozens of...maybe over a hundred...people, since Obama changed the access rules.

Clapper became a Clinton lapdog, he no longer has credibility.
 
If this leads to the WH, and it very well could, I want to see Obama in jail.
 
Leftwingers don't care about lawlessness as long as it furthers liberalism. The ends justify the means.
As they are always saying.

Sent from my HTC6515LVW using Tapatalk
 
As they are always saying.

Sent from my HTC6515LVW using Tapatalk

We heard it was far back as the 1960's, with phrases like "by any means necessary"
 
Former President Barack Obama’s ambassador to the United Nations has testified that others made so-called unmasking requests in her name, House Oversight Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy said Tuesday.

“Her testimony is they may be under my name, but I did not make those requests,” Gowdy said of former Ambassador Samantha Power during an interview with Fox News’ Bret Baier on "Special Report with Bret Baier."

Gowdy: Former UN Ambassador Samantha Power claims others unmasked in her name | Fox News

This is odd to say the least. Its one thing for a member of Obama's National security team to request the unmasking of American citizens caught up upstream searches, but for someone else to use Samantha Powers security clearances hundreds of times to disclose classified information ? Thats a big deal

Hmmmm... and if that were true why was nobody alarmed at the clear breach of the upper reaches of the Obama administration?
 
Actually there's been a update ! Susan Powers over 260 unmasking request were not made by her, or so she testified.

Someone, used her name and security clearance to make those request, and thats not only illegal, but it throws a wrench into the whole " it was done for legitmate National security reasons " excuse we've been hearing since this story broke.

EnigmaO01's really super cares about national security except when a top Democrat administration official is claiming that some unknown person hacked her SIPR account and used it to illegally request the unmasking of hundreds of Americans... then it is just "meh". :roll:

The likelihood of this actually happening approaches Zero, and would be one of the greatest breaches in national security in history if it happened.
 
Hmmmm... and if that were true why was nobody alarmed at the clear breach of the upper reaches of the Obama administration?

Some people were. Just the MSM 'news' (political propaganda) media wasn't, so it was never heard from in any substantial coverage.
 
Agreed.

Corrupt FBI, given that Hillary's escape clause was preordained months before she was even interviewed by the FBI.

Corrupt DOJ, covering up the Uranium One deal, the corrupt Tarmac meeting, and many other instances.

Corrupt Secretary of State, with her pay to play, from just about everyone and anyone.

Corrupt administration, spying domestically.

A dead fish rots form the head, so that'd be Obama. Corrupt president, and a his corrupt administration, as we are finding out.

If the media weren't so leftist and weren't so much political propagandists, weren't so much talking to each other in the liberal echo chamber that is the bi-coastal blue fringes, they might even wake up to give a damn about it, which they are not, so politically agenda driven they.

Wow so many Conspiracy's so little time...When is Hillary Clinton going to get indicted?...Seems the goons that surround trump are going to get indicted............Soon
 
Wow so many Conspiracy's so little time...When is Hillary Clinton going to get indicted?...Seems the goons that surround trump are going to get indicted............Soon

You seem to be very intent on dismissing the OP. Without once backing up any of your disbelief with actual facts. Since you obviously think that Gowdy lied, how about you prove it. After that you can also prove why stealing the credentials of Ms. Powers is a no big deal. Assuming of course that you can't prove that Gowdy is lying.

I'll await your well thought out explanation. Pretty sure it will take more than one line....
 
No can do. Someone has to post these threads or the forum will turn into one big Trump bashing circle jerk.

If you dont like it, I suggest you stop supporting and defending low life Politicians who use their Political positions to enrich themselves

You ever get tired of yelling in a one man echo chamber? Most of the American pubic have moved on from the past especially your unfounded claims. You're boring us.
 
EnigmaO01's really super cares about national security except when a top Democrat administration official is claiming that some unknown person hacked her SIPR account and used it to illegally request the unmasking of hundreds of Americans... then it is just "meh". :roll:

The likelihood of this actually happening approaches Zero, and would be one of the greatest breaches in national security in history if it happened.

zzz...
 
You seem to be very intent on dismissing the OP. Without once backing up any of your disbelief with actual facts. Since you obviously think that Gowdy lied, how about you prove it. After that you can also prove why stealing the credentials of Ms. Powers is a no big deal. Assuming of course that you can't prove that Gowdy is lying.

I'll await your well thought out explanation. Pretty sure it will take more than one line....

Gowdy?...He is a trump toadie and a Hill Billy hack....Deal with it...or go blame Hillary
 
You ever get tired of yelling in a one man echo chamber? Most of the American pubic have moved on from the past especially your unfounded claims. You're boring us.

Im guessing you havnt responded whateover to the actual Op because irellevent and emotional Ad homs like the one above are the best you can offer up.
Whats funny is you think your'e actually " winning " Your not, your'e making a fool out of yourself
 
Why is it that you guys have to belittle everyone you do not agree with and call them names while accusing Trump of doing the very same thing? Do you not realize that Trump may very well be president because Hillary called his supporters deplorables? Does it ever enter into your brains that taking the low road is what elected Trump? Hillary spent her whole time attacking Trump and calling him and his supporters names instead of saying what she was going to do for American's jobs. Her campaign slogan was "Stronger Together" but that does not include white people, or Republicans. How'd you expect her to win?

Its a cyclical thing. They only have a few cards that fail over and over before recycling a strategy.

Ridicule, russia, crazy, unfit, mean, illegitimate, nazi, racist....Go back to 1 and retry. The transference and irony are palpable. Repeating the same strategy over and over is associated with insanity. God bless them.


Gowdy seems sensible. Pretty much the opposite of the unhinged around here.



Good Speech
 
Back
Top Bottom