• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump campaign subpoenaed over sexual assault allegations

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
94,136
Reaction score
82,404
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Trump campaign subpoenaed over sexual assault allegations


By Kevin Bohn
October 15, 2017

Lawyers for one of the women who have accused Donald Trump of sexual assault subpoenaed his campaign for all documents relating to her, all communications with or about her and "all documents concerning any woman who asserted that Donald J. Trump touched her inappropriately." This comes in the case of Summer Zervos, a former contestant on "The Apprentice" who accused Trump of sexually assaulting her in 2007. The accusations were made in October of last year at a news conference. Zervos claims Trump kissed her twice on the lips during a lunch meeting in his New York City office and on a separate occasion in Beverly Hills, she alleges he kissed her aggressively and touched her breast. In a statement at the time, Trump denied these claims. The subpoena, issued in March, is just coming to light now and is part of a defamation lawsuit filed by Zervos in January in the New York State Supreme Court against Trump following his denials. The subpoena was served to the campaign, but Zervos' lawyers and the campaign agreed to suspend the response date until after a motion to dismiss the lawsuit is decided, Mariann Wang, one of her attorneys, told CNN. She said campaign officials gave assurances that the documents be preserved which they did. His lawyers also said if the case isn't dropped at least it should be stayed until he leaves office.

Information about the subpoena was entered into the court record as part of a filing in which Zervos' attorneys argued against dismissal of the suit. While Trump's attorneys have said Zervos' allegations are politically motivated, her lawyers disagreed. "Contrary to Defendants' spin, this case is not about robust political debate. Ms. Zervos was not a political opponent, nor was she a political commentator routinely engaged in criticizing candidates," Zervos' attorneys countered in a court filing last month. "She came forward to report the details of Defendants' unwanted sexual battery only after he repeatedly lied publicly about his behavior. Defendant then used his international bully pulpit to violate her for a second time." Trump's attorneys face an October 31 deadline to further respond in support of the request for the case to be dismissed. Trump's attorney did not respond to a request for comment. The White House referred comment to the campaign, and a representative did not return a request for comment.

Interesting. Trump utilized his Fifth Amendment right (against self-incrimination) 90+ times in legal depositions concerning 'other women' during his divorce from first wife Ivana.

Trump himself boasted that he can freely grab ***** because his wealth, fame, and notoriety serve to insulate him from criminal/civil consequences.

Do we have a predatory 'Harvey Weinstein' personality in the White House?
 
Why would the Trump Campaign have anything on any allegations of an incident that allegedly occurred 10 years ago?

The allegations start off with one foot in the grave...the lawyer is Gloria Allred. If this woman wants any credibility she will hire a lawyer that isnt the preeminent celebrity/fame ambulance chaser.
 
[Insert "But Bill Clinton!" Here]
We arent at the "But Bill Clinton..." part of the commentary yet. That comes when we see the parade of leftists that will **** themselves over the allegations of Trump but that voted...twice...for Clinton and his predator accomplice wife. As of now...this is and can still be about Trump.
 
Trump campaign subpoenaed over sexual assault allegations




Interesting. Trump utilized his Fifth Amendment right (against self-incrimination) 90+ times in legal depositions concerning 'other women' during his divorce from first wife Ivana.

Trump himself boasted that he can freely grab ***** because his wealth, fame, and notoriety serve to insulate him from criminal/civil consequences.

Do we have a predatory 'Harvey Weinstein' personality in the White House?

5th amendment = guilt.
 
Going after campaign communications for events that occurred 10 years beforehand seems like a fishing expedition.
 
Trump campaign subpoenaed over sexual assault allegations


Interesting. Trump utilized his Fifth Amendment right (against self-incrimination) 90+ times in legal depositions concerning 'other women' during his divorce from first wife Ivana.
Trump himself boasted that he can freely grab ***** because his wealth, fame, and notoriety serve to insulate him from criminal/civil consequences.
Do we have a predatory 'Harvey Weinstein' personality in the White House?

If we've learned anything from conservatives with the Weinstein and Clooney accusations, this means that ALL Republicans can no longer be trusted and are hypocrites. This is how the group blame game is played, right?
 
Trump campaign subpoenaed over sexual assault allegations




Interesting. Trump utilized his Fifth Amendment right (against self-incrimination) 90+ times in legal depositions concerning 'other women' during his divorce from first wife Ivana.

Trump himself boasted that he can freely grab ***** because his wealth, fame, and notoriety serve to insulate him from criminal/civil consequences.

Do we have a predatory 'Harvey Weinstein' personality in the White House?

There is one quality that has, from my observation, united all sexual predators: once one woman stands up to her attacker, all the other victims start to come out of the woodwork.

From everything I've seen and heard, there's nothing to separate Trump from Cosby, Clinton and Weinstein.
 
Going after campaign communications for events that occurred 10 years beforehand seems like a fishing expedition.

I may be in error, but campaigns look for dirt/ mishaps or such on their own candidate to prevent surprises and are then prepared to reply. Pro active not reactive in the media does work well.
 
There is one quality that has, from my observation, united all sexual predators: once one woman stands up to her attacker, all the other victims start to come out of the woodwork.

From everything I've seen and heard, there's nothing to separate Trump from Cosby, Clinton and Weinstein.
One thing that's different between the three is the visceral hatred a lot of people have for Trump even before any accusations were made. The same can't be said for Cosby or Weinstein.
 
Trump campaign subpoenaed over sexual assault allegations




Interesting. Trump utilized his Fifth Amendment right (against self-incrimination) 90+ times in legal depositions concerning 'other women' during his divorce from first wife Ivana.

Trump himself boasted that he can freely grab ***** because his wealth, fame, and notoriety serve to insulate him from criminal/civil consequences.

Do we have a predatory 'Harvey Weinstein' personality in the White House?


Trump really said "...because his wealth, fame, and notoriety serve to insulate him from criminal/civil consequences?"

Link please -- I missed that the first time around.
 
One thing that's different between the three is the visceral hatred a lot of people have for Trump even before any accusations were made. The same can't be said for Cosby or Weinstein.

I see you left out Clinton :)
 
We arent at the "But Bill Clinton..." part of the commentary yet. That comes when we see the parade of leftists that will **** themselves over the allegations of Trump but that voted...twice...for Clinton and his predator accomplice wife. As of now...this is and can still be about Trump.

Interestingly, you had nothing to say about Trump...
 
One thing that's different between the three is the visceral hatred a lot of people have for Trump even before any accusations were made. The same can't be said for Cosby or Weinstein.

1. I could say the same about Clinton, but I'm not (and to steal from lurchadams' post, you left his name out, interestingly enough).
2. Also, coming from the other side, that argument doesn't do you any favors because there wasn't visceral hatred of Cosby and Weinstein. In fact, up until this story, the vast majority of the public thought a "Weinstein" was one of those irritating words that came up on the screen before the movie you paid twenty dollars to see finally started.
3. The public's dislike of a candidate isn't evidence of his innocence (or guilt).
4. And using an extension of your logic, the vast adoration his supporters lavish upon him isn't evidence of his guilt (or innocence).
5. If we were to dismiss the sexual assault allegations against a person because a large segment of the population loathed him, then we'd de facto be handing every politician a get-out-of-jail-free card for sexual assault.
 
Why would the Trump Campaign have anything on any allegations of an incident that allegedly occurred 10 years ago?

The allegations start off with one foot in the grave...the lawyer is Gloria Allred. If this woman wants any credibility she will hire a lawyer that isnt the preeminent celebrity/fame ambulance chaser.

Gloria Allred would take her father to court on behalf of her mother for her conception if she thought she could gain for it.
 
Not nesseciarily true. There can be multiple reasons why one would plead the 5th aside from guilt.

I believe that is the point that was being made.
 
the only sexual assault case against trump has been thrown out 3 times by a judge.
the last one was dropped by the accuser herself and her lawyer.

the other accusations by women turned out to be false based on actual witnesses.
 
the only sexual assault case against trump has been thrown out 3 times by a judge.
the last one was dropped by the accuser herself and her lawyer.

the other accusations by women turned out to be false based on actual witnesses.

Relevant passages and links?
 
I see you left out Clinton :)
You're right, oversight on my part. There was definitely hatred directed at Clinton, but in the end what got him impeached was perjury. Nothing else really gained any traction. And whatever hatred directed at him still pales in comparison to what's been directed at Trump.
 
Relevant passages and links?

this has been discussed already when the allegations came out.
you were all over those threads. so i am not going to rehash things that have
already been proven go look them up yourself.
 
You're right, oversight on my part. There was definitely hatred directed at Clinton, but in the end what got him impeached was perjury. Nothing else really gained any traction. And whatever hatred directed at him still pales in comparison to what's been directed at Trump.

We're not talking about impeachment of Clinton due to his perjury over his relationship with Monica Lewinsky, but the veracity of sexual assault allegations stemming from multiple women accusing their assailant of sexual assault. On that issue, Clinton, Cosby, Weinstein and Trump all share that in common.

So back to your initial point, if you believe that wide scale hatred of Trump is somehow reason for disregarding fifteen women's accusations, then you must by necessity disregard the accusations against Clinton.
 
Back
Top Bottom