• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Poll: Trump approval falls in every state

You've crowed that a few times. Why have Democrats lost seats? It's largely a function of gerrymandering not that too few people vote Democratic. In Wisconsin, "Republicans got just 48.6 percent of the statewide vote, they still captured a 60-39 seat advantage in the General Assembly."

You can't gerrymander unless you won the elections in the first place! After that, the other side can complain they lose all the time due to gerrymandering, when they have absolutely no proof that they would have won in any of those elections that they claimed gerrymandering.
 
You can't gerrymander unless you won the elections in the first place! After that, the other side can complain they lose all the time due to gerrymandering, when they have absolutely no proof that they would have won in any of those elections that they claimed gerrymandering.
Tell it to the judges. This is going to the SCOTUS. One has to be a particular type of partisan to think it's ok to get a minority of the votes and take 2/3 of the seats.
 
He certainly doesn't have a liberal vision for America. That's why he was elected president and that's why Democrats have lost over 1,000 seats the last eight years.

That's why dems have lost seats? Interesting.
 
You can't gerrymander unless you won the elections in the first place! After that, the other side can complain they lose all the time due to gerrymandering, when they have absolutely no proof that they would have won in any of those elections that they claimed gerrymandering.

Yeah, all those 1000 plus seats wasn't won BEFORE the gerrymandering. But you knew that.
 
Tell it to the judges. This is going to the SCOTUS. One has to be a particular type of partisan to think it's ok to get a minority of the votes and take 2/3 of the seats.

Wow. First you're depending on Mueller. Now you are depending on a favorable decision from the conservative leaning court.
 
Yeah, all those 1000 plus seats wasn't won BEFORE the gerrymandering. But you knew that.

What a bunch of crybabies. Every time you lose an election you cry gerrymandering or you cry about the electoral college.
 
What a bunch of crybabies. Every time you lose an election you cry gerrymandering or you cry about the electoral college.

Is it crying if it is true?

I wonder what you will be "crying" about it 2018?
 
What a bunch of crybabies. Every time you lose an election you cry gerrymandering or you cry about the electoral college.

Your response is par for the course. Democrats complaining about Republicans gerrymandering: "crybabies."
Athletes complaining about nagging racism: GOP response: "millionaire crybabies."
Puerto Ricans complaining that relief efforts were slow and insufficient: GOP response: "They want everything to be done for them, crybabies."
 
Back
Top Bottom