• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

3 US Army special operations commandos killed in Niger

Wow I don't think I have seen so much wrong all in one post before. Congrats on a job well done. Though to be fair since all you are doing is repeating the propaganda you get from RT I guess they should really get the credit instead of you.

If RT deserved the credit, I would acknowlege that. I have never seen RT. I have not watched Network (MSM) TV since 1990. Obviously, the drain upon the brain has been too much for you, but although the prognosis is poor, it is not all bad news. Pehaps a mental disability in the future,eh?
/
 
If RT deserved the credit, I would acknowlege that. I have never seen RT. I have not watched Network (MSM) TV since 1990. Obviously, the drain upon the brain has been too much for you, but although the prognosis is poor, it is not all bad news. Pehaps a mental disability in the future,eh?
/

I doubt anyone one besides your fellow Russian apologist Thoreau believe you have never seen RT. Believing that you don't follow them yet still parrot all their propaganda perfectly is so unbelievable that only a CT true believer like yourself or him would fall for it.
 
Well it's a damn good thing I didn't say we are arming ISIS in that post then isn't it? When your done attacking strawmen let me know so that we can start talking about things actually said and not statements you conjured up out of thin air.

Maybe we should stop arming and training terrorists in Syria and relocate those assets to fighting radical Islamic Terrorists in Nigeria (and Niger). Most people are ignorant of the fact that Boko Haram has a much higher kill count than ISIS.

You mean like all of these other times you've made the same claim and tried to snivel your way into showing how the US is arming ISIS directly or indirectly? :roll:


In other words the US didn't arm ISIS. ISIS took arms from our allies.

Our allies are literally giving them to ISIS. They're acting as middle-men if not outright taking our supplies and joining ISIS themselves. That's like saying a cashier "takes" your money in exchange for products.

So your want to continue the Obama Doctrine of arming and training terrorists in ISIS?

You're so bad at this.
 
Last edited:
You mean like all of these other times you've made the same claim and tried to snivel your way into showing how the US is arming ISIS directly or indirectly? :roll:









You're so bad at this.

Poor reinoe doesn't seem to realize that once you post things they are there to stay. That must be the hard part of being a troll. It must be hard to keep track of all the BS you post. He is obviously not up to the task.
 
If RT deserved the credit, I would acknowlege that. I have never seen RT. I have not watched Network (MSM) TV since 1990. Obviously, the drain upon the brain has been too much for you, but although the prognosis is poor, it is not all bad news. Pehaps a mental disability in the future,eh?
/

Polly want an RT cracker?
 
Maybe we should stop arming and training terrorists in Syria and relocate those assets to fighting radical Islamic Terrorists in Nigeria (and Niger). Most people are ignorant of the fact that Boko Haram has a much higher kill count than ISIS.

Killing whom? Unarmed civilians?
 
It seems to be what we do: try to impose a Pax Americana on the rest of the world. How much longer do you think we'll afford to be the world's cop?
Until someone stronger comes along and makes us leave, we drain the capital and resources of the area we're protecting for our own profit/use, or we change the governing system of this country so that we don't do this.
 
Saddam was our MidEast ally and we sold him the precursors to make the gas. We also encouraged him to invade Iran resulting in about one million deaths. The USA policy in the MidEast is "death and destruction," and it is obvious wherener we are in the MidEast.

Citation for "precursors to make GAS"?

And what "gas" was made from these precursors?

You do know gas and the delivery systems were from other countries, right?
 
Citation for "precursors to make GAS"?

And what "gas" was made from these precursors?

You do know gas and the delivery systems were from other countries, right?

Read the entire article

How Reagan Armed Saddam with Chemical Weapons

https://www.counterpunch.org/2004/06/17/how-reagan-armed-saddam-with-chemical-weapons/

"Iraqi chemical attacks on Iranian troops–and US assistance to Iraq–continued throughout the Iran-Iraq war. In a parallel program, the US defence department also provided intelligence and battle-planning assistance to Iraq.
The August 17, 2002 NYT reported that, according to “senior military officers with direct knowledge of the program”, even though “senior officials of the Reagan administration publicly condemned Iraq’s employment of mustard gas, sarin, VX and other poisonous agents … President Reagan, vice president George Bush [senior] and senior national security aides never withdrew their support for the highly classified program in which more than 60 officers of the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) were secretly providing detailed information on Iranian deployments, tactical planning for battles, plans for air strikes and bomb-damage assessments for Iraq.”

"Iraqi chemical attacks on Iranian troops–and US assistance to Iraq–continued throughout the Iran-Iraq war. In a parallel program, the US defence department also provided intelligence and battle-planning assistance to Iraq.
The August 17, 2002 NYT reported that, according to “senior military officers with direct knowledge of the program”, even though “senior officials of the Reagan administration publicly condemned Iraq’s employment of mustard gas, sarin, VX and other poisonous agents … President Reagan, vice president George Bush [senior] and senior national security aides never withdrew their support for the highly classified program in which more than 60 officers of the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) were secretly providing detailed information on Iranian deployments, tactical planning for battles, plans for air strikes and bomb-damage assessments for Iraq.”

"According to William Blum, writing in the August 1998 issue of the Progressive, Sam Gejdenson, chairperson of a Congressional subcommittee investigating US exports to Iraq, disclosed that from 1985 until 1990 “the US government approved 771 licenses [only 39 were rejected] for the export to Iraq of $1.5 billion worth of biological agents and high-tech equipment with military application …
“The US spent virtually an entire decade making sure that Saddam Hussein had almost whatever he wanted… US export control policy was directed by US foreign policy as formulated by the State Department, and it was US foreign policy to assist the regime of Saddam Hussein.”
 
Read the entire article

How Reagan Armed Saddam with Chemical Weapons

https://www.counterpunch.org/2004/06/17/how-reagan-armed-saddam-with-chemical-weapons/

"Iraqi chemical attacks on Iranian troops–and US assistance to Iraq–continued throughout the Iran-Iraq war. In a parallel program, the US defence department also provided intelligence and battle-planning assistance to Iraq.
The August 17, 2002 NYT reported that, according to “senior military officers with direct knowledge of the program”, even though “senior officials of the Reagan administration publicly condemned Iraq’s employment of mustard gas, sarin, VX and other poisonous agents … President Reagan, vice president George Bush [senior] and senior national security aides never withdrew their support for the highly classified program in which more than 60 officers of the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) were secretly providing detailed information on Iranian deployments, tactical planning for battles, plans for air strikes and bomb-damage assessments for Iraq.”

"Iraqi chemical attacks on Iranian troops–and US assistance to Iraq–continued throughout the Iran-Iraq war. In a parallel program, the US defence department also provided intelligence and battle-planning assistance to Iraq.
The August 17, 2002 NYT reported that, according to “senior military officers with direct knowledge of the program”, even though “senior officials of the Reagan administration publicly condemned Iraq’s employment of mustard gas, sarin, VX and other poisonous agents … President Reagan, vice president George Bush [senior] and senior national security aides never withdrew their support for the highly classified program in which more than 60 officers of the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) were secretly providing detailed information on Iranian deployments, tactical planning for battles, plans for air strikes and bomb-damage assessments for Iraq.”

"According to William Blum, writing in the August 1998 issue of the Progressive, Sam Gejdenson, chairperson of a Congressional subcommittee investigating US exports to Iraq, disclosed that from 1985 until 1990 “the US government approved 771 licenses [only 39 were rejected] for the export to Iraq of $1.5 billion worth of biological agents and high-tech equipment with military application …
“The US spent virtually an entire decade making sure that Saddam Hussein had almost whatever he wanted… US export control policy was directed by US foreign policy as formulated by the State Department, and it was US foreign policy to assist the regime of Saddam Hussein.”

I read it.

The US provided precursors for BIOLOGICAL weapons.

VX, Mustard, Sarin ARE NOT BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS.

Please try again.
 
Until someone stronger comes along and makes us leave, we drain the capital and resources of the area we're protecting for our own profit/use, or we change the governing system of this country so that we don't do this.

We drain our own capital and resources in the process.
 
Guess someone can't figure out the difference betwewn bio weapons and chemical weapons.....

Here is an idea. Where do you really believe the gas used came from?

Hint. Chima, France and Germany had a hand.
 
3 US Army special operations commandos killed in Niger





I didn't know we had commandos in Niger, did you?

Yep, but our Commander-in-Chief, who is so worried that the San Fransisco offensive line was not respecting the troops that he sent his only forgotten geebo to Indianapolis, who gave up his tickets (while the taxpayers gave up their $100-200,000) just so he could make a grand exit on the national anthem.

This C-i-C, who is so devoted to the honor of our troops didn't even have a spare 140 characters to mention the great sacrifice these three men made by giving their lives front lines on war on terror. No, we were just a little too busy fighting Colin Kaepernick.
 
Yep, but our Commander-in-Chief, who is so worried that the San Fransisco offensive line was not respecting the troops that he sent his only forgotten geebo to Indianapolis, who gave up his tickets (while the taxpayers gave up their $100-200,000) just so he could make a grand exit on the national anthem.

This C-i-C, who is so devoted to the honor of our troops didn't even have a spare 140 characters to mention the great sacrifice these three men made by giving their lives front lines on war on terror. No, we were just a little too busy fighting Colin Kaepernick.
Your TDS seems to be getting out of hand. You should probably go and try and get some help for that. It would help you lead a fuller and happier life if you didn’t suffer with these mental health problems.
 
Your TDS seems to be getting out of hand. You should probably go and try and get some help for that. It would help you lead a fuller and happier life if you didn’t suffer with these mental health problems.

The entire country could lead a fuller and happier life if the president didn't suffer from those mental health problems.
 
The entire country could lead a fuller and happier life if the president didn't suffer from those mental health problems.

Or if other folks would just deal with their issues instead of allowing their TDS to take total control of their thinking ability like several of the posters on this site have done.
Trumps behavior has not effected the fullness or happiness of my life one bit. And I bet nothing he has done has effected the vast majority of folks suffering from TDS either, outside of their imagination that is.
 
The entire country could lead a fuller and happier life if the president didn't suffer from those mental health problems.

So you admit that your health and well-being is determined by Trump's actions? That's textbook TDS. I didn't get emotional about Obama's blundering and you shouldn't get upset about anything Trump does. Seek professional help.
 
Or if other folks would just deal with their issues instead of allowing their TDS to take total control of their thinking ability like several of the posters on this site have done.
Trumps behavior has not effected the fullness or happiness of my life one bit. And I bet nothing he has done has effected the vast majority of folks suffering from TDS either, outside of their imagination that is.

You know, you actually have a point. I don't plan to travel abroad, so don't have to deal with a president who is a laughing stock. I have Medicare, so don't have to deal with Trump care, should it ever pass. Until and unless he starts a shooting war, or a trade war with China, his nonsense won't affect me much, at least not personally. Should he get his tax cut, along with a trillion dollar spending bill, along with an expensive great wall of Trump, then the deficit will, of course, be monumental, but he can't do any of that on his own.

So, maybe, just maybe Trump can continue to be kept on a short enough leash that he can't do too much harm.
 
So you admit that your health and well-being is determined by Trump's actions? That's textbook TDS. I didn't get emotional about Obama's blundering and you shouldn't get upset about anything Trump does. Seek professional help.

I didn't say, my personal health and well being, but that of the country.
But, sure, the electorate just might need professional help if they think Trump is going to "make America great again."
 
Your TDS seems to be getting out of hand. You should probably go and try and get some help for that. It would help you lead a fuller and happier life if you didn’t suffer with these mental health problems.

Huh. So facts and the actual record frighten you. Sad.
 
Huh. So facts and the actual record frighten you. Sad.

The only thing I am frightened for is your well being. Living with the amount of TDS you and some of the posters on this site display can not lead to a long healthy life. You should really look in to getting some help.
 
The only thing I am frightened for is your well being. Living with the amount of TDS you and some of the posters on this site display can not lead to a long healthy life. You should really look in to getting some help.

It's OK that facts and reality frighten you to death. Good of you to come clean about your pathologies.
 
Or if other folks would just deal with their issues instead of allowing their TDS to take total control of their thinking ability like several of the posters on this site have done.
Trumps behavior has not effected the fullness or happiness of my life one bit. And I bet nothing he has done has effected the vast majority of folks suffering from TDS either, outside of their imagination that is.

I think you are on the wrong track here, pal.

Derangement (I assume you are suggesting TDS to be 'Trump Derangement Syndrome') is "a mental disorder or severally mentally disturbance". This term was previously used to describe people with an irrational fear of George W Bush or Barrack Obama. To suggest there is an equivalent irrational fear of Trump is to suggest that Trump is just another US President with detractors that fear him or his actions without basis. Wow, what could be more absurd? Do you honestly believe he is just another mis-understood president and people have no reason to be detractors? Are you that out of touch with the reality that you fail to grasp why this is different?

Now I could make the argument that irrationally of TDS is really those that think Trump is a real President, but I will leave that for another day. Equally irrational, however, are those that cannot see clearly why people fear Trump. Let me help you.

Let's start with the fact that almost 60% of America (almost a super majority of American's) think Trump is unfit for the job.

Majority of Americans think Trump is unfit to serve as president
https://poll.qu.edu/national/release-detail?ReleaseID=2487

Do you grasp that at all? This is not a job approval number, this is American's thinking he lacks the essentials to do the job: to lead our country, keep us safe and keep the world at peace. That is a compelling testament to what a bad leader this guy is.

Moreover, if you recall, Trump was the first major party candidate to garner a single major newspaper endorsement.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newsp...the_United_States_presidential_election,_2016
With some major papers that had not endorsed Democrats in over 70 years, coming out in favor of Hillary (or not Trump) because that said that Trump was UNFIT FOR OFFICE….
As with any job, the qualification list usually starts with experience. Typically, our election process, including the vetting, works to challenge the substance and integrity of a candidate. In our history, we have only elected five men that had never previously held elected office; three of which served in the military (Taylor, Grant and Eisenhower) and two of which held senior cabinet positions (Hoover and Taft). Other than Eisenhower (and maybe Taft), these administrations turned out to be some of our worst.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Histor..._United_States

So, now we have candidate Trump, who brings the weakest resume ever to the American people. So, what qualifies him for this job? Well, some cite his business experience, but that seems dubious:

Donald Trump?s business disaster is worse than you think - MarketWatch
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/07/op...sinessman.html
http://www.newsweek.com/2016/08/12/donald-trumps-business-failures-election-2016-486091.html
http://www.dailywire.com/news/3729/donald-trump-successful-businessman-not-really-aaron-bandler#
http://time.com/3988970/donald-trump-business/

He has almost no other positive attribute. Others say he is not a 'liar' or 'corrupt' like Hillary. But the record shows he is hardly an upgrade (and is probably worse -- Politifact says he

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...-in-one-place/

So, we have raw, exposed Donald Trump, who I will tell you is a unique combination of arrogant, ignorant, thinned-skinned, narcissistic, vindictive, with a poor temperament (he is fundamentally a child), hints of racism.

Arrogance/Ignorance - He told us he knows more about ISIS than the Generals. Now he is rebuffing intelligence briefings:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/n...014-story.html
http://www.jjmccullough.com/index.ph...-donald-trump/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...=.c1f4913a0ec7

(continued)
 
Continuation of #73


thinned-skinned narcissist:

Page Not Found (404) - The Atlantic
Page not found
Page Not Found (404) - The Atlantic
Nothing found for Blog Archive How He Speaks
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...icans-election
http://www.shrinktank.com/psychologi...-donald-trump/

His temperament is almost self-evident. He spends hours tweeting about people that criticize him, to the point of his personal destruction (case in point: all things that have happened since debate #1.... he can not stay out of his way. He insists on monopolizing the news cycle)

It is no wonder that he has NO newspaper endorsements and most of the A players in the Republican party will not back or even vote for him.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newspa...election,_2016
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/p...tock/91784714/
http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/08/politi...election-2016/


Other prevailing wisdom that Trump can not do the job:

http://www.timesofisrael.com/the-dan...-donald-trump/
http://www.spiegel.de/international/...a-1075060.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/13/wo...an-rights.html
http://www.economist.com/news/leader...trumps-america

This says nothing about his actions to date, which have done little to alleviate and much to confirm the preconceived fears. If foreign government had been a loose about talking about nukes and total annihilation of a sovereign state as has Trump, they would be deemed a rouge nation and we would be threatening sanctions or war. Isn't it troubling that he is the first world leader to go there in our life times?

How has this affected you? Are you serious? To use Condi Rice's term (paraphrased)... do you need to see a mushroom cloud to know how this guy has affected you? Do you need see the obvious division in the country that, while he may not have caused, he is certainly dumping salt into the wounds daily by feeding his super-minority base and disregarding the majority?

Irrational fear of Trump? No pal, it is very rational fear of this man. What is irrational or deranged, is the failure of many to respect that concerns of the majority. Derangement has afflicted those that see this presidency as normal, or even acceptable.
 
Last edited:
Continuation of #73


thinned-skinned narcissist:

Page Not Found (404) - The Atlantic
Page not found
Page Not Found (404) - The Atlantic
Nothing found for Blog Archive How He Speaks
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...icans-election
http://www.shrinktank.com/psychologi...-donald-trump/

His temperament is almost self-evident. He spends hours tweeting about people that criticize him, to the point of his personal destruction (case in point: all things that have happened since debate #1.... he can not stay out of his way. He insists on monopolizing the news cycle)

It is no wonder that he has NO newspaper endorsements and most of the A players in the Republican party will not back or even vote for him.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newspa...election,_2016
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/p...tock/91784714/
http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/08/politi...election-2016/


Other prevailing wisdom that Trump can not do the job:

http://www.timesofisrael.com/the-dan...-donald-trump/
http://www.spiegel.de/international/...a-1075060.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/13/wo...an-rights.html
http://www.economist.com/news/leader...trumps-america

This says nothing about his actions to date, which have done little to alleviate and much to confirm the preconceived fears. If foreign government had been a loose about talking about nukes and total annihilation of a sovereign state as has Trump, they would be deemed a rouge nation and we would be threatening sanctions or war. Isn't it troubling that he is the first world leader to go there in our life times?

How has this affected you? Are you serious? To use Condi Rice's term (paraphrased)... do you need to see a mushroom cloud to know how this guy has affected you? Do you need see the obvious division in the country that, while he may not have caused, he is certainly dumping salt into the wounds daily by feeding his super-minority base and disregarding the majority?

Irrational fear of Trump? No pal, it is very rational fear of this man. What is irrational or deranged, is the failure of many to respect that concerns of the majority. Derangement has afflicted those that see this presidency as normal, or even acceptable.
Thank you for perfectly proving my point far better then I ever could. Well done.
 
Back
Top Bottom