• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hillary mulls challenging legitimacy of 2016 election, cites Russian influence

Renae

Banned
Suspended
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 26, 2007
Messages
50,241
Reaction score
19,243
Location
San Antonio Texas
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Conservative
Hillary Clinton[FONT=&quot] on Monday would not rule out the possibility of challenging the results of the 2016 presidential election, saying it’s clear the Russians influenced the outcome and that the legitimacy of President [/FONT]Trump[FONT=&quot]’s victory could be called into question as congressional and independent probes into Russian involvement move forward.[/FONT][FONT=&quot]In an interview with NPR, the former secretary of state — who will speak in Washington on Monday evening as part of her nationwide book tour — would not rule out formally contesting the results of the election.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]“I wouldn’t rule it out,” she said, though she quickly admitted there’s virtually no legal path forward, and that challenging election results at this point would be unprecedented.[/FONT]
Hillary Clinton mulls challenging legitimacy of 2016 election, cites Russian influence - Washington Times

Yeah, you have fun with that.. moron. YOU are the number one reason you are a hasbeen washed up old prune and not the first female POTUS.
 
She's definitely right that there's no legal path forward. Makes me question why she wouldn't rule it out.
 
She's definitely right that there's no legal path forward. Makes me question why she wouldn't rule it out.
I think she just wants the headline. Right now Clinton seems more focused on stopping the Democratic party from sliding left than really going after Trump in any serious way. It keeps up her in the conversation.
 
I think she just wants the headline. Right now Clinton seems more focused on stopping the Democratic party from sliding left than really going after Trump in any serious way. It keeps up her in the conversation.

I am pretty sure that she thinks she is helping the morale of those who wanted her, but it is pretty clear that she is not, that most everyone wants her to disappear.....she is like the disgraced CEO who tries to keep a hand in even after the board has thrown them overboard....she cant let go....cant grasp that she is done.
 
Remember when your golden boy said he wouldn't rule out the use of nukes?

I don't recall this being a thread about Trump, nukes or your silly attempts to derail the conversation. Stay on topic or stay out.
 
There is already a thread on this subject, do we really need two?
 
There is already a thread on this subject, do we really need two?

Actually, there are three threads going. Not sure who started the first one. But I guess if I had voted for Hillary and she was doing as bad a job as Trump is and as embarrassing as Trump has been, I'd be looking for excuses to talk about him also.
 
Actually, there are three threads going. Not sure who started the first one. But I guess if I had voted for Hillary and she was doing as bad a job as Trump is and as embarrassing as Trump has been, I'd be looking for excuses to talk about him also.

Both threads omit key info, fake news courtesy of the Hillary haters. Its been debunked by several posters.
 
There is already a thread on this subject, do we really need two?

Lol, do you make the same admonishment for the plethora of #ih8trump threads? No? Didn't think so. :roll:
 
How desperate are the Right to detract from Trumps lies? This desperate !!
 
I don't recall this being a thread about Trump, nukes or your silly attempts to derail the conversation. Stay on topic or stay out.

Fine, let's discuss the context of her conversation.

Why should she rule out entirely the possibility of a legal challenge? What, there's no circumstances in which you'd find that warranted? A video of Trump himself and Putin openly discussing hacking the election and how it directly caused his victory, while Jesus Christ looks on and nods sagely and says "Yes, this definitely happened," and you wouldn't even think about it eh?
 
Fine, let's discuss the context of her conversation.

Why should she rule out entirely the possibility of a legal challenge? What, there's no circumstances in which you'd find that warranted? A video of Trump himself and Putin openly discussing hacking the election and how it directly caused his victory, while Jesus Christ looks on and nods sagely and says "Yes, this definitely happened," and you wouldn't even think about it eh?

She lost, it had nothing to do with Russia, she failed.
 
Fine, let's discuss the context of her conversation.

Why should she rule out entirely the possibility of a legal challenge? What, there's no circumstances in which you'd find that warranted? A video of Trump himself and Putin openly discussing hacking the election and how it directly caused his victory, while Jesus Christ looks on and nods sagely and says "Yes, this definitely happened," and you wouldn't even think about it eh?

I would not expect an answer, these are the same folks who deny Trump committed obstruction of justice even after the dumb ass admits it to Lester Holt. These folks are trump drunk, and they have the goggles on to prove it lol
 
Hillary Clinton mulls challenging legitimacy of 2016 election, cites Russian influence - Washington Times

Yeah, you have fun with that.. moron. YOU are the number one reason you are a hasbeen washed up old prune and not the first female POTUS.


Fourth paragraph in the article down:

“There are scholars, academics, who have arguments that it would be [possible], but I don’t think they’re on strong ground. But people are making those arguments. I just don’t think we have a mechanism,” Mrs. Clinton said.

Hillary haters gonna hate.
 
Last edited:
Why can't the bad lady just go away.
 
Yeah, you have fun with that.. moron. YOU are the number one reason you are a hasbeen washed up old prune and not the first female POTUS.
Why does anyone think that this will be any different?
Very sad really.
Why can't the bad lady just go away.

... because, kids, by stirring the pot with minimal effort, Hillary is going to make more in books sales from What Happened than any of you have personally earned in the past 10 years of your careers.

I'd also mention that liberals ain't the political constituency that thinks taxes the ultra wealthy are "too high," so I hope to hear a little more cheer out of the self-describe conservative folks.


Finally, Hillary won the popular vote by 3 million votes.
 
... because, kids, by stirring the pot with minimal effort, Hillary is going to make more in books sales from What Happened than any of you have personally earned in the past 10 years of your careers.

I'd also mention that liberals ain't the political constituency that thinks taxes the ultra wealthy are "too high," so I hope to hear a little more cheer out of the self-describe conservative folks.


Finally, Hillary won the popular vote by 3 million votes.

POPULAR VOTE YOU SAY?? Oh wait, that's not how we select the President, that's why she's a hasbeen now.
 
... because, kids, by stirring the pot with minimal effort, Hillary is going to make more in books sales from What Happened than any of you have personally earned in the past 10 years of your careers.

I'd also mention that liberals ain't the political constituency that thinks taxes the ultra wealthy are "too high," so I hope to hear a little more cheer out of the self-describe conservative folks.


Finally, Hillary won the popular vote by 3 million votes.

I'm not saying it's not a financially smart move, but comparatively Kim Kardashian makes a killing taking pictures of herself. Just because something makes money doesn't mean that something is inherently good or even intelligent.

Yoko Ono made money grunting and marrying a Beatle, Kylie Jenner makes money Instagramming and showing herself off, Paris Hilton made money off her rich daddy and became relevant with a sex tape, Justin Beiber tries to stay relevant leaking nudes, the "cash me outside" girl became popular because she was a trashy delinquent, and Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by 3 million people :mrgreen:
 
Back
Top Bottom