- Joined
- Jun 22, 2013
- Messages
- 20,271
- Reaction score
- 28,076
- Location
- Mid-West USA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
People have recently raised the issue of the high cost of protecting the current President after a recent USA Today article blaming him for increased costs.
However:
Sooo...the President has a larger family than the prior administration (see 18 family members of the 42 people who have S.S. protection vs what number of the 31 under President Obama? (Strangely, I cant find that number in any search engine, I wonder why?)
In any case, blaming this cost on Trump's "vacations" is a bit disingenuous IMO. Just saying. :coffeepap:
However:
Secret Service: Trump'''s Not Our Only Problem - NBC NewsThe U.S. Secret Service is facing money problems — but that's not President Donald Trump's fault, the agency's director said Monday, in response to a report that the First Family was straining protective resources.
Secret Service Director Randolph "Tex" Alles said funding for roughly 1,100 agents working overtime in 2017 is not an issue "that can be attributed to the current Administration’s protection requirements alone, but rather has been an ongoing issue for nearly a decade due to an overall increase in operational tempo."
Alles told USA Today the agency is handling an unprecedented number of White House officials who need protection. Under Trump, 42 people have protection, including 18 members of the Trump family. That's up from 31 during the Obama administration.
"The president has a large family, and our responsibility is required in law,'' Alles told the newspaper. "I can't change that. I have no flexibility.''
Our agency experienced a similar situation in calendar year 2016 that resulted in legislation that allowed Secret Service employees to exceed statutory caps on pay," Alles said.
Sooo...the President has a larger family than the prior administration (see 18 family members of the 42 people who have S.S. protection vs what number of the 31 under President Obama? (Strangely, I cant find that number in any search engine, I wonder why?)
In any case, blaming this cost on Trump's "vacations" is a bit disingenuous IMO. Just saying. :coffeepap:
Last edited: