• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Neo-Nazi website is back online with Russian help

I'm surprised you didn't post a meme. lol

If a beer summit is your only excuse for the far right's hate and divisiveness.....then who are the real snowflakes?

The right blames everyone and the kitchen sink for their own behavior....personal responsibility isn't even part of their lexicon anymore. It's always someone else's fault...and never has that been made more clear than with that far right wing trolling idiot residing in the WH.
I'm sorry, did you think I was defending the far right? You couldn't be further from the truth, which seems to be a recurring theme in most of your posts.

Obama stuck his nose in a situation that he shouldn't have and injected racism into a situation where there was none. It was his first swipe at the cops as well.

You're not even discussing the same topic anymore. Try following along and stop going off-topic.
 
Of course Neo-Nazi website is back online with Russian help

Our neo-fascists love Russia and hate America



It pays to read:

The Daily Stormer's return via the Russian internet turned out to be short-lived. The site became inaccessible later Wednesday after RU-CENTER also suspended its registration.

It's also an auto-registration, exactly like the Google one. When they saw what it was they shut it down. But by all means, carry on with your narrative.
 
It pays to read:

The Daily Stormer's return via the Russian internet turned out to be short-lived. The site became inaccessible later Wednesday after RU-CENTER also suspended its registration.

It's also an auto-registration, exactly like the Google one. When they saw what it was they shut it down. But by all means, carry on with your narrative.
You broke your narrative, comrade.
 
I'm sorry, did you think I was defending the far right? You couldn't be further from the truth, which seems to be a recurring theme in most of your posts.

Obama stuck his nose in a situation that he shouldn't have and injected racism into a situation where there was none. It was his first swipe at the cops as well.

You're not even discussing the same topic anymore. Try following along and stop going off-topic.

But wasn't it you that said that NAFTA, Obamacare and the beer summit was far worse than white supremacy, nationalism and neo-nazi's? And wasn't it you that's been calling people "snowflakes" because they don't agree with you? I think if you dig a little deeper there's a lot more substance to BLM and removing confederate statues than you care to admit. But apparently, empathy is a dirty word among the right wing and explains a lot about them as human beings...or lack thereof.


"First swipe at the cops"....but it wasn't the first time that a black man was falsely accused and arrested by the police...and that seems to be the point that you refuse to see. I mean really....how dare Obama try to address racial tensions over a beer. How dare he try to change the status quo of white priviledge. Gosh, no wonder you're still so upset. :roll:

The topic was pretty much over the minute the Russians stopped hosting the Daily Stormer website...and I haven't seen you mention the topic or anything about that in this entire thread. All I've done is respond to your words....so what was the topic that I'm allegedly not following?
 
Last edited:
You do know that the Khmer Rouge was fully supported by the Chinese, right? Your proof doesn't hold water.

In fact, most genocides are committed by a minority, because most of them are committed by a government.
 
I'm sorry, did you think I was defending the far right? You couldn't be further from the truth, which seems to be a recurring theme in most of your posts.

Obama stuck his nose in a situation that he shouldn't have and injected racism into a situation where there was none. It was his first swipe at the cops as well.

(. . .)

Your opinion on the incident which took place in Cambridge shows us that you hold "far-right" views.
 
But wasn't it you that said that NAFTA, Obamacare and the beer summit was far worse than white supremacy, nationalism and neo-nazi's? And wasn't it you that's been calling people "snowflakes" because they don't agree with you? I think if you dig a little deeper there's a lot more substance to BLM and removing confederate statues than you care to admit. But apparently, empathy is a dirty word among the right wing and explains a lot about them as human beings...or lack thereof.
I did not say that NAFTA, Obamacare and the reason for the "beer summit" (Obama sticking his nose where it didn't belong) was worse than those groups/entities. If that's what you took from my comments, you clearly have an issue with reading comprehension and understanding.

I don't call people snowflakes because they don't agree with me at all. I call them snowflakes because they think they are special. They think they're entitled and are easily offended by anything that doesn't fall in line with their thinking. Their "opinions" are based on emotion rather than common sense or logic. They get triggered and want to pull down every monument or statue that offends them without considering the consequences of their actions - because they don't think logically, they think emotionally. For example, where does the slippery slope end now that we're on it? Will monuments or statues of Lincoln, the man who ended slavery, be destroyed (oops, already happened) or will someone call for a George Washington statue to be taken down (oops, already happened). We now have people wanting to take down a Bill Clinton statue, a Reagan statue, etc... Snowflakes aren't thinkers, they're emotional trainwrecks who shouldn't be anywhere near public policy or decision-making.

"First swipe at the cops"....but it wasn't the first time that a black man was falsely accused and arrested by the police...and that seems to be the point that you refuse to see. I mean really....how dare Obama try to address racial tensions over a beer. How dare he try to change the status quo of white priviledge. Gosh, no wonder you're still so upset. :roll:
Sigh...

The reason for the beer summit was because Obama started flapping his lips about something that he had no business commenting on. He ran with a story without having all the facts (the irony) and cause an uproar over something that wasn't the civil rights cause he had hoped it would be. It turned out to be an angry entitled snowflake who disrespected the cop who was doing his job by responding to a call of an attempted burglary, which we all know now was not an attempted burglary. The cop did what he was trained to do and the professor ran to the media with the lies and the half-truths that we continue to see time and time again. Both the cop and the professor could have handled that quite differently and the panel that reviewed that situation came to that very conclusion. I don't know how many times I've said that if you give respect you get it in return and the professor showed no respect to the cop who was merely doing his job, thus escalating a situation that didn't need to be escalated. Obama and the professor tried to turn it into a race issue when it was more of a lack of respect issue than anything.

The topic was pretty much over the minute the Russians stopped hosting the Daily Stormer website...and I haven't seen you mention the topic or anything about that in this entire thread. All I've done is respond to your words....so what was the topic that I'm allegedly not following?
I was responding to another poster when you decided to jump in and embarrass yourself. Instead of reading what was really there, you decided to do what you always do, which is prove that you struggle to comprehend the written word.
 
Last edited:
Your opinion on the incident which took place in Cambridge shows us that you hold "far-right" views.
It shows no such thing. Where do you people come up with this stuff? Was there a revised liberal playbook that was published recently?
 
RedAkston in post #212 wrote
The cop did what he was trained to do and the professor ran to the media with the lies and the half-truths that we continue to see time and time again. Both the cop and the professor could have handled that quite differently and the panel that reviewed that situation came to that very conclusion.

Red you contradict yourself in just two sentences: The cop did NOT do what he was trained to do as acknowledged in the report and your words, "the cop . . . could have handled that quite differently"

Yes, I personally see far right and racist views in your posts - my opinion, derived from the words I read.
 
RedAkston in post #212 wrote

Red you contradict yourself in just two sentences: The cop did NOT do what he was trained to do as acknowledged in the report and your words, "the cop . . . could have handled that quite differently"

Yes, I personally see far right and racist views in your posts - my opinion, derived from the words I read.
https://www.google.com/amp/www.foxn...ssor-arrest-finds-incident-avoidable.amp.html

The facts prove otherwise, sorry.

I'm betting that you see racism where it doesn't exist quite frequently. There isn't a racist bone in my body and I've not said a racist thing in my history here at DP and I've been here for almost 10 years now. So do you have any facts to back up your ridiculous claim or was this just an emotional reaction on your part where facts and logic didn't come into play? (Hint: I already know the answer)
 
https://www.google.com/amp/www.foxn...ssor-arrest-finds-incident-avoidable.amp.html

The facts prove otherwise, sorry.

I'm betting that you see racism where it doesn't exist quite frequently. There isn't a racist bone in my body and I've not said a racist thing in my history here at DP and I've been here for almost 10 years now. So do you have any facts to back up your ridiculous claim or was this just an emotional reaction on your part where facts and logic didn't come into play? (Hint: I already know the answer)

Really? "facts prove otherwise" I have no idea where you are getting your beliefs about the situation, as even in your linked article, I can read the following: "The report suggests that Crowley could have more clearly explained what he was doing and why, especially after being shown Gates' license and university ID. For his part, Gates could have used a more respectful tone to address the officer."

I read that as telling the rational, non-racist person as a clear failure to support your original contention that Sgt Crowley " did what he was trained to do"

Once again, it all falls back upon one's personal beliefs as to whether or not one's own words are racist. Only the most blatant white supremacists openly proclaim their beliefs in the inferiority of People of Colour but many others who keep their mouths shut when the KKK speaks out or who for some reason can always defend a cop who kills or injures a black person or always fall back on "whataboutism" as a diversion when blatant racism is exposed - those persons are racists no matter how loudly and frequently they say otherwise.
 
Really? "facts prove otherwise" I have no idea where you are getting your beliefs about the situation, as even in your linked article, I can read the following: "The report suggests that Crowley could have more clearly explained what he was doing and why, especially after being shown Gates' license and university ID. For his part, Gates could have used a more respectful tone to address the officer."

I read that as telling the rational, non-racist person as a clear failure to support your original contention that Sgt Crowley " did what he was trained to do"

Once again, it all falls back upon one's personal beliefs as to whether or not one's own words are racist. Only the most blatant white supremacists openly proclaim their beliefs in the inferiority of People of Colour but many others who keep their mouths shut when the KKK speaks out or who for some reason can always defend a cop who kills or injures a black person or always fall back on "whataboutism" as a diversion when blatant racism is exposed - those persons are racists no matter how loudly and frequently they say otherwise.
Ignoring the last paragraph which was nothing but incoherent rambling, what was the professor arrested for?
 
Ignoring the last paragraph which was nothing but incoherent rambling, what was the professor arrested for?

Uh uh, you are the one who stated that the cop did what he was trained to do. Sgt Crowley DID NOT do what he was trained to do. The End.
 
Uh uh, you are the one who stated that the cop did what he was trained to do. Sgt Crowley DID NOT do what he was trained to do. The End.
Such a non-compelling argument which carries no weight whatsoever. Apparently reading the link could have saved you the embarrassment of, well embarrassing yourself. But that's OK, I get it, facts don't matter to you only feelings do. And this is why your posts are easily dismissed because they lack logic and any sign of a coherent thought process.
 
Such a non-compelling argument which carries no weight whatsoever. Apparently reading the link could have saved you the embarrassment of, well embarrassing yourself. But that's OK, I get it, facts don't matter to you only feelings do. And this is why your posts are easily dismissed because they lack logic and any sign of a coherent thought process.

I've posted this a couple times on this forum: Denial ain't just a river in Egypt

in-de-nile.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom