• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump 'seriously considering' a pardon for ex-Sheriff Joe Arpaio

The man's 87 years old and had a spotless record before this. Ever think he might want to see his family and not die in a prison cell? You people just think this is a big game where anything is fair as long as you can criticize Trump for it. I feel sorry for you actually.
 
I disagree that traffic officers making stops of suspected unlicensed drivers is, in and of itself, a crime. But if a judge says that practice is to cease then you had best heed that legal 'advice'.

From what I understand, there was more than that. He repeatedly disobeyed court orders. And from what I recall, cost the county approx 100 Mil in legal suits and costs.
 
Reading up on Joe, you could be forgiven for thinking you were reading an article from the Onion. Unfortunately it wasn't satire. Just an awful person. Read up on Arpaio's office failure to investigate sex crimes.
 
Full pardon and the award for citizenry. God bless Joe.
 
The man's 87 years old and had a spotless record before this. Ever think he might want to see his family and not die in a prison cell? You people just think this is a big game where anything is fair as long as you can criticize Trump for it. I feel sorry for you actually.

Yes. Mindless lemmings will eventually have an idea of their own? We can only hope.
 
You basically said that Trump is a bad person. I wanted to make sure.

Some notes on the former sheriff.
Read them, then comment
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...onsidering-a-pardon-for-joe-arpaio/?tid=a_inl

No? Let’s review Arpaio’s history.

In 2011, the Justice Department concluded that Arpaio’s deputies had engaged in the worst pattern of racial profiling that the DOJ had ever investigated.
That report found that Arpaio’s deputies routinely put Spanish-speaking prisoners in solitary confinement as punishment for their inability to speak English.
It found that 1 in 5 traffic stops during Arpaio’s immigration sweep’s involved Fourth Amendment violations.
It found that Latinos were four to nine times more likely to be pulled over than non-Latinos.
It found that Arpaio’s deputies harassed citizens and non-citizens alike based solely on the color of their skin or for speaking Spanish.
A 2012 Justice Department report found that “MCSO jail employees frequently refer to Latinos as ‘wetbacks,’ ‘Mexican bitches,’ and ‘stupid Mexicans.’ MCSO supervisors involved in immigration enforcement have expressed anti-Latino bias, in one instance widely distributing an email that included a photograph of a Chihuahua dog dressed in swimming gear with the caption ‘A Rare Photo of a Mexican Navy Seal.’ MCSO and Arpaio’s words and actions set the tone and create a culture of bias that contributes to unlawful actions.
Accusations that Arpaio’s deputies continued to harass Latinos were affirmed by another federal judge in 2013. Arpaio then launched an investigation of that judge.
That report also found that Arpaio was spending so much time harassing Latinos that his department was neglecting violent crime.
Among the crimes Arpaio’s office is alleged to have let languish: sex crimes, particularly those in which the victims were Latino or undocumented immigrants.
Consistent with Trump’s longtime racist obsession, back in 2012, Arpaio launched an “investigation” into Barack Obama’s birth certificate. Arpaio claimed he had proof that the document was “definitely fraudulent.”
On multiple occasions, federal judges have found that Arpaio’s jails are unconstitutionally inhumane, most notably when it comes to diet, health care and mental health. The vast, vast majority of the people in Arpaio’s jails are being held on suspected immigration violations.
Arpaio also re-instituted chain gangs, including for women and juveniles.
Arpaio in fact once boasted that his jails were akin to a “concentration camp.”
 
Back
Top Bottom