- Joined
- Apr 18, 2013
- Messages
- 94,329
- Reaction score
- 82,720
- Location
- Barsoom
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
North Korea vows to 'make the US pay dearly' as sanctions tighten
I personally do not believe sanctions will alter Kim Jong Un's quest for nuclear WMD. The NK people will suffer under the new UN sanctions, but that is of no concern to the Kim regime. Time is running short. Within a year or less, NK will be able to mate nuclear warheads with ICBMs able to strike the continental United States. Precise targeting is not a primary concern. The overarching problem is, a preemptive war with NK will most likely kill millions on the Korean peninsula. It seems to me that the most sensible immediate response is to ring NK with concentric anti-missile systems in-depth.
Thoughts on rational ways to move forward?
By Joshua Berlinger and K.J. Kwon
Mon August 7, 2017
North Korean state media has slammed the latest round of sanctions approved by the United Nations, calling them a "flagrant violation of our sovereignty." It vowed retaliation against Washington. The UN Security Council unanimously adopted new sanctions Saturday in response to Pyongyang's long-range ballistic missile tests on July 4 and July 28. The measures aim to make it harder for North Korea to make money across the globe. They target North Korea's primary exports -- including coal, iron and seafood -- and attempt to cut off its additional revenue streams by targeting some of its banks and joint ventures with foreign companies. Speaking at the ASEAN Regional Forum on Monday, North Korean Foreign Minister Ri Yong Ho blamed the US for the current situation on the Korean Peninsula and said Pyongyang's "possession of nuclear weapons and intercontinental ballistic missiles is a legitimate option for self-defence in the face of a clear and real nuclear threat posed by the US," according to a statement released by North Korea. "We will, under no circumstances, put the nukes and ballistic rockets on the negotiating table," Ri said, adding Pyongyang would "teach the US a severe lesson" if it used military force against North Korea.
Also on Monday, North Korea's state-run KCNA news agency said the country's missile launches were a "stern warning to the US," and warned Washington against "believing that its land is safe across the ocean." KCNA accused the US of "trying to drive the situation of the Korean Peninsula to the brink of nuclear war" and pushing the UN to pass new sanctions. "(North Korea) will make the US pay dearly for all the heinous crimes it commits against the state and people of this country," KCNA said. Pyongyang sees its weapons program as the key to preventing US-led attempts at regime change, and the July missile tests showed Pyongyang may have passed an important threshold in its quest to obtain the ability to hit the US with a nuclear warhead. Weapons experts say the two intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) were theoretically capable of reaching the mainland United States. But they were both fired at a lofted angle, likely to avoid hitting land (both ICBMs landed in the waters off the coast of the Korean Peninsula.)
I personally do not believe sanctions will alter Kim Jong Un's quest for nuclear WMD. The NK people will suffer under the new UN sanctions, but that is of no concern to the Kim regime. Time is running short. Within a year or less, NK will be able to mate nuclear warheads with ICBMs able to strike the continental United States. Precise targeting is not a primary concern. The overarching problem is, a preemptive war with NK will most likely kill millions on the Korean peninsula. It seems to me that the most sensible immediate response is to ring NK with concentric anti-missile systems in-depth.
Thoughts on rational ways to move forward?