• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump demands apology, accuses Obama of having 'colluded or obstructed'

I'm unsure why this poster is searching through my post history. It is kind of disturbing actually.

You claimed you were misquoted. In which instance?
 
When Obama spoke, America heard some multi-sylable words. Now we hear "Bad Thing" and "Good Thing".

You keep things simple. Obama overly made things difficult to understand because he knew what he was offering was bad for America.
 
You wouldn't be freaked out if someone searched through your post history in 2013, 2014? It feels like I am being stalked.

Not a single bit. I'm proud of my words and my posts, and stand behind them. Why in the wide world of sports would you be "freaked out" if someone quoted what you said in the past?

The fact you are freaked out about your own words says a whole lot about you. A whole lot.
 
Not a single bit. I'm proud of my words and my posts, and stand behind them. Why in the wide world of sports would you be "freaked out" if someone quoted what you said in the past?

The fact you are freaked out about your own words says a whole lot about you. A whole lot.

Quite frankly, quoting posters for something they said years ago shouldn't be allowed. What makes it worse is that he took my post completely out of context and twisted my words.
 
Quite frankly, quoting posters for something they said years ago shouldn't be allowed. What makes it worse is that he took my post completely out of context and twisted my words.

FFS...Seriously? Your words have an expiration date? What you said six months ago can't be applicable today -- if heaven forfend they show hypocrisy?

Nah, can't have that. As for context? Every poster here can click the little arrow button next to your name in that post, and a direct link to the entire context can be seen.

Sounds like you want a safe space from your own words. That's approaching Jump the Shark territory.
 
FFS...Seriously? Your words have an expiration date? What you said six months ago can't be applicable today -- if heaven forfend they show hypocrisy?

Nah, can't have that. As for context? Every poster here can click the little arrow button next to your name in that post, and a direct link to the entire context can be seen.

Sounds like you want a safe space from your own words. That's approaching Jump the Shark territory.

They are my words, I have ownership over what I say. If you want to quote me you should as a courtesy ask for permission. I am entitled to that, at minimum.
 
They are my words, I have ownership over what I say. If you want to quote me you should as a courtesy ask for permission. I am entitled to that, at minimum.

Only with a copyright. Then you could even charge money.:mrgreen:
 
They are my words, I have ownership over what I say. If you want to quote me you should as a courtesy ask for permission. I am entitled to that, at minimum.

:lamo

yoly guacamole.

LOLOLOLOLOL

omg...I can't stop laughing.

Bucky thinks we need to "ask his permission" to quote him/


LOLOLOLOL
 
They are my words, I have ownership over what I say. If you want to quote me you should as a courtesy ask for permission. I am entitled to that, at minimum.

I've been on message boards for well over 20 years.

This has to be one of the funniest things I've ever read ===> if you want to quote me, you need to ask my permission. I'm "entitled" to that -- "at a minimum."

:lamo

:lamo

:lamo
 
They are my words, I have ownership over what I say. If you want to quote me you should as a courtesy ask for permission. I am entitled to that, at minimum.

That is....

....yup, that is among the worst, most pathetic attempt to weasel out of hypocrisy that I have seen in....

....man. Some time Anyone got any better examples?
 
I thought the reason Obama did nothing was that nothing happened and any report to the contrary is fake news; has The Ministry rewritten history again?



You'd think he'd give us enough time to learn the new doublespeak.
Nice try pal, but you already had all your lib buds at your lean. Pulling wool over the rest of our eyes will be an unaccomplishable feat, happy to say that pin ball already left the slot.

You on that side used to be better at covering your little falacies with leaves. Hint: there is quite a sustantial chasm, Rio Grande style large between Russian meddling/interference and Russian Coĺlusion.

Well, at least with team Trump. Hill -Billy giving away what, 20% of our uranium to the Russians and for some reason Bill's speaking fees in Moscow skyrocket. We all know that now that your side has flopped like a caught fish in the boat, we can start after your side. Start with the first piece, be it Lois Lerner, Comey, Rice, or the one they have already decided to investigate, the Loretta Lynch pin...

But your high state of basic confusion about such "matters" is, again, duly noted.
 
Last edited:
That quote was in direct reference to the connection between Trump and Russia. No proof exists that Trump and Russia were working with each other.

Ummm the quote was in direct connection to Russian meddling. Which you said was laughable.
 
Stop mis-quoting me.

So which is it bucky?

Is the idea that Russia meddled with our election laughable, and thus there was nothing for Obama to "do nothing" about?

OR

Did Russia actually meddle with our election, and Obama "did nothing" about it?
 
They are my words, I have ownership over what I say. If you want to quote me you should as a courtesy ask for permission. I am entitled to that, at minimum.

Yeah....No you don't, no they shouldn't, and no you aren't.

You posted something on THIS forum in a public space. Any poster is more than free to quote that post and reference it in a thread you're participating in when said quote is relevant to an argument they're making that relates to the topic. Which absolutely is the case in this instance.

You're just putting forward false entitlement and ridiculous notions of ownership because your words blatantly contradict themselves.
 
This is just more of the same from Trump in terms of the idiocy. Make a ludicrous claim, throw in a bunch of buzz words that he's been hearing a bunch in the media without any understanding of what they actually mean, and go on the attack regardless of how much it makes no logical sense with all the bull**** he said previously.
 
This is just more of the same from Trump in terms of the idiocy. Make a ludicrous claim, throw in a bunch of buzz words that he's been hearing a bunch in the media without any understanding of what they actually mean, and go on the attack regardless of how much it makes no logical sense with all the bull**** he said previously.

"Obama knew about Russia. Democrats did nothing! Covering for Hillary!"

6 months ago it was an excuse for losing an election they "should've won".

Obama did put extra sanctions on Russia that Flynn "may or may not" have discussed.
 
They are my words, I have ownership over what I say. If you want to quote me you should as a courtesy ask for permission. I am entitled to that, at minimum.

Really?

You've never asked my permission when you've quoted me. Is that some man-thang or something?

Tell ya what. I won't quote you if you won't quote me. (Not that I'd want to.)
 
So which is it bucky?

Is the idea that Russia meddled with our election laughable, and thus there was nothing for Obama to "do nothing" about?

OR

Did Russia actually meddle with our election, and Obama "did nothing" about it?
While you are at it, why don't you tell us where you stand on the matter, eh?

"Did Russia actually meddle with our election, and Obama "did nothing" about it?"

If he did do something about it, what... and how the hell weak was that? Yanno?
 
So which is it bucky?

Is the idea that Russia meddled with our election laughable, and thus there was nothing for Obama to "do nothing" about?

OR

Did Russia actually meddle with our election, and Obama "did nothing" about it?

Are you going to let me answer your question?

To answer, Russia may have meddled in our election however it had zero effect on Trump winning the election. The reason why Obama did nothing is because he knew of the clear ties between Russia and Hillary Clinton.

Certainly, Trump or his campaign had no direct knowledge of the meddling. Once again, the meddling had such a minuscule effect on the election results, it isn't really newsworthy.

And EVEN if Putin and Trump were in cahoots, that isn't a impeachable or illegal action.
 
Really?

You've never asked my permission when you've quoted me. Is that some man-thang or something?

Tell ya what. I won't quote you if you won't quote me. (Not that I'd want to.)

The poster in question quoted a random quote I said over a year ago and mis-quoted me.
 
Back
Top Bottom