Re: State Department probes Clinton handling of government emails, could pull her sec
What point is that? Hanger isn't making a point, he's defending Fox News for no other reason but because I identified the article's attempt to emotionally sway readers with nothing more than a "nu-uh." He, and yourself show a complete lack of knowledge on the matter at hand.
It's not additional, factual information because having a security clearance doesn't inherently grant access to classified information. I've already explained this and was promptly ignored by mouthbreathers like yourself and Hanger.
Fake news.
What is there to respond to when your only contribution to the thread was ranting and raving about people you don't like instead of the actual topic at hand? I've learned it's best to just treat posters like you like the crazy homeless person on the subway.
.
Dood, so "triggered" simply by someone pointing out information we all find incredible? Chill bro.
The fact that even after the whole WORLD had it proven to us that Hillary and her staffers had been criminally negligent in the handling of highly sensitive information over an illegally set up private server, that she still somehow has a security clearence, that it, by hook or crook, has yet to be yanked for all the egregious innumerable violations is not only pertinent to the story regarding security clearences and Hillary Clinton, it is another indicator of just why it is that the faceless, unprofessional, often devious and unrepentent bureaucrats should not have so much control over our lives.
These faceless seemingly untouchable civil servants, here only to serve us, do not seem to have a real sense of legality, prudence or proper percepton of the problems.
Btw, your additional information was not ignored, it was just filed away as additional information that has little, if any, bearing on the fact that this incompent woman, who you agreed from the start should be in prison, clearly should not still be in possession of clearences.
PERIOD.
Say, for instance, if another new knuckle dragger lefty were somehow disastoriously elected to the presidency (and we have proof of this happening as you guys reinstalled that lying idiot Obombed after his first failed term), does anybody in their right (I now have to worry about those of the left mind mostly) mind not justifiably conclude that this potentially and previously described plausible knuclehead could so determine, if for only politically expedient purposes, that this thoroughly investigated and found supremely negligent incompetent woman might be qualified to recommence getting highly classified information again?
It goes against all reason...but as the "Russin collusion" episode has plainly driven home, real reason is not required. So, more rational heads fear that a lefty in power might just be that imprudent.
Common sense is not "fake news", bro.
Despite your head feints to the contrary, I am, and have been, debating the points plus explaining my rationale for some of the reasoning as to why. You know, since you tried, instead of debating the point, to portray my posts otherwise...cringe worthy I think is the manner in which you feebly mischaracterized it.
Then, when you could not develop either a defense or attack on the merits you now further ad hom it by trying to dismiss everything as a rant thus avoiding the necessity of an intelligent response.
Good luck with that "debate" tactic