• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Comey admitted single Trump leak, but were there others?

iguanaman said:
So all the info from multiple intelligence sources in multiple countries about intercepts of Trump's people taking with Russians who were being monitored as spies is untrue? When you say stuff like that I worry about your sanity. Those intercepts were not lies. We just want to know what they were talking about. Why is that so difficult to understand?
Click to expand...

Are you kidding?

Team Trump has been surveilled "incidentally", both legally and almost undeniably illegally what with the obombed administration unmasking and illegally leaking. That went on for 10 months...give us some proof, put up, finally, or shut up as the saying goes.

You got nothing but fumes. Which fumes are, evidently, potent enough lies to get the majority of your amalgamted minorities way way high. And with this you are questioning MY sanity?
 
Gaugingcatenate said:
Are you kidding?

Team Trump has been surveilled "incidentally", both legally and almost undeniably illegally what with the obombed administration unmasking and illegally leaking. That went on for 10 months...give us some proof, put up, finally, or shut up as the saying goes.

You got nothing but fumes. Which fumes are, evidently, potent enough lies to get the majority of your amalgamted minorities way way high. And with this you are questioning MY sanity?
Click to expand...

Yawn. Anyone aware of the specifics of the situation knows that there is no credible evidence that Team Twump was illegally surveilled.

Odd you would mention fumes when you're choking on fumes from your own delusions.
 
Last edited:
Paperview said:
Just ask John Miller or John Barron.
Click to expand...

I meant if what you leak supports what they want to report.
Under those circumstances they won't much care if you use the nom de plume of Auric Goldfinger
 
iguanaman said:
I certainly hope he doesn't make such a rash move. I'm not so sure he won't though. It appears he wants to continue the meme that there were no secret contacts with Russians by anyone in the campaign. I'm pretty sure Mueller wont agree to that.
Click to expand...

ax Mueller? Not bloody likely.
a collusion finding? Not bloody likely.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
Yawn. Anyone aware of the specifics of the situation knows that there is no credible evidence that Team Twump was not illegally surveilled.

Odd you would mention fumes when you're choking on fumes from your own delusions.
Click to expand...
Besides the point that you very effectively exclude yourself by your own rules about any awareness of specifics, you really should proof read your main assertions before hitting the submit button.

The way you worded it, your assertion confirms my point.

As to the rest, let me say this....Zzzzzzzzz....Zzzzzzz
 
Gaugingcatenate said:
Besides the point that you very effectively exclude yourself by your own rules about any awareness of specifics, you really should proof read your main assertions before hitting the submit button.

The way you worded it, your assertion confirms my point.

As to the rest, let me say this....Zzzzzzzzz....Zzzzzzz
Click to expand...

It's OK that you can't back up your unhinged, whackadoodle claim and have to run from it and you had to rely on a typo on my part. Fixed.

Pretty much your expected M.O. by now.

Thanks for proving my point, post after post after post.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
It's OK that you can't back up your unhinged, whackadoodle claim and have to run from it and you had to rely on a typo on my part. Fixed.

Pretty much your expected M.O. by now.

Thanks for proving my point, post after post after post.
Click to expand...
As I told the other fella, put up or shut up.

Evidence? Give me a single piece of solid evidence after 11 months of legal and illegal spying on team Trump.
 
Gaugingcatenate said:
As I told the other fella, put up or shut up.

Evidence? Give me a single piece of solid evidence after 11 months of legal and illegal spying on team Trump.
Click to expand...

LOL! "Illegal spying"?

As I told the other fella, put up or shut up. You keep braying, and yet you keep running from your claim.
 
Today is Orange Trumps 71st birthday. Please join me in saying "Kiss my ass Trump".
 
Erod said:
Lol, it's a clear leak. That's not even debatable. Perhaps several now while he was still director.
Click to expand...

It is very debatable. It happened after he was fired and Trump was whining about tapes of their conversations. And it was hardly classified information he shared. All he did was show the depravity of this Orange Oaf.
 
bubbabgone said:
His personal memo recounting a meeting with the POTUS easily satisfies a claim of Executive Privilege ... and it was likely written on a US Government device.

So yeah, it can be considered a leak.
Click to expand...

Just starting the thread, but, no, that memo doesn't violate Executive Privilege, which is probably why the WH didn't sue to stop Comey from releasing the memo or testifying about it because they had no case.
 
Peter King said:
It is very debatable. It happened after he was fired and Trump was whining about tapes of their conversations. And it was hardly classified information he shared. All he did was show the depravity of this Orange Oaf.
Click to expand...

Then why did he have to give it to a friend to give to the NY Times? And apparently, this friend has been tied to multiple links that the NY Times has used over the years.

This was clearly a leak. And apparently, Comey might have been leaking other information for months prior.
 
Lovebug said:
I could give a rats ass who's POTUS. Comey crossed the line. Nothing to do with butthurt and obviously nothing to see but Comey's overblown ego.
Click to expand...

How did he cross a line? I understand why some people might not like what he released/leaked, but as a general observation I don't see it crossing any line that 100s of others haven't crossed when they write memoirs or similar. He was no longer in the FBI, and I've yet to find any legal expert who claims he violated Executive Privilege. The way I look at it is does the public have a right to know, or is the public interest advanced by knowing about this conversation. I'd say yes, but even if you disagree, that's a claim about the wisdom of this particular "leak" not whether in general conversations like that should as a matter of principle be kept secret from the public.

Just for example, if this was Obama "hoping" in a private, one on one discussion, that Lynch or Comey would drop the investigation into Hillary's email because she's a good person, etc. I expect zero conservatives would complain about one of them 'leaking' that discussion, and rightly so.
 
Erod said:
Then why did he have to give it to a friend to give to the NY Times? And apparently, this friend has been tied to multiple links that the NY Times has used over the years.

This was clearly a leak. And apparently, Comey might have been leaking other information for months prior.
Click to expand...

He might have been the leak, same as likely hundreds of others, and there is as much evidence Comey was the leaker in those other cases as [pick one] of those other hundreds of individuals - none.
 
Gaugingcatenate said:
Your options:

EPU or SU

Sent from my SM-J700M using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Unlike you, I haven't made full canvas jacket unhinged lunatic claims and run from them

You, however, have.

zzzzzzz.... you still can't substiantiate your claim, eh?

Knock me over with a feather!
 
Erod said:
Then why did he have to give it to a friend to give to the NY Times? And apparently, this friend has been tied to multiple links that the NY Times has used over the years.

This was clearly a leak. And apparently, Comey might have been leaking other information for months prior.
Click to expand...

except there is zero evidence for any leaks from Comey, if anyone is a leaker it is Trump (for example to the bleeding Russians in the Oval Office, a place no Russian government official should be in the first place).
 
reinoe said:
James Comey called it a leak. Did he lie under oath and commit perjury?
Click to expand...

Comey spoke of this under oath and before Senators and 20 million viewers.

A week has passed already. Why hasn't Mr. Comey been duly arrested and charged if what he did was illegal?

No Trumper can seem to answer that question. I'll answer it. No arrest/charge because no crime was committed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom