• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

McDaniel urges an end to congressional Russia-Trump probes

Lutherf said:
What conclusion? The only outcome the Democrats will accept is that Trump gets put out of office and a Democrat gets put in. This isn't about law and it isn't about America. It's about Democrats seeing their dream of an Obamaworld wrecked on the rocks of their own hubris.
Click to expand...

Their resistance isn't stopping things from getting done.

Last week's progress.......
The House on June 8 voted, 233-186, to repeal key parts of the 2010 Dodd-Frank law.

Last week, McConnell said the Senate was moving closer to producing a health care version.

A new committee has been formed to take on eliminating the countless number of regulations that hinder infrastructure projects from getting permits that cost cities and states a lot of money and often takes 10 years in which time many good projects die.

And even with all the naysayers over tax reform it actually is moving forward in the House.

A coal mine reopened in PA.

I also saw a proposal for the construction of the Wall on the border (where it is feasible) and the design showed it having solar panels which would generate electricity that would help pay for the wall.. But you don't hear about the progress in the MSM. You have to go looking for it.

But one by one of Obama policies are being overturned that hindered economic growth.
 
Last edited:
Kurmugeon said:
I find it humorous to see you say this... since the time marks clearly show, given the length of the various web-site articles I referrenced, you could not possibly have read even one of them, before you posted this.

I would say, that pretty much shows, you're evalutation of the web-sites S****...

-
Click to expand...

Where did I say I read your stories? I said your sources suck. And they do. National Review. Fox Nation and Mellinial Review. That latter is the only one I wasn't familiar with so I went to their "About" page to see what they are about and...

The mission of The Millennial Review is to provide a platform for politically-engaged millennials to promote and defend the conservative values of freedom, limited republican government, and a robust civil society that have made America truly exceptional. Aware of Reagan’s words that “freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction” and that “it must be fought for, protected, and handed on” for us to do the same, our mission is straightforward: to accept the right and duty of our generation to fight for, protect, and hand on the values that will keep America exceptional.​

Your sourcses really suck partisan balls.
 
fmw said:
Why? He was involved in political campaigns in Russia years ago. So what?
Click to expand...

It'll most likely be financial. Money laundering stuff like that with his dealings through the Ukraine with the Russians.
 
DiAnna said:
I'm not so sure. Sec. Coats' and Admiral Rogers' testimony was very enlightening by what they didn't say. They refused to answer nearly every question about whether Trump had discussed the Russia investigation and asked them to do something to stop it by... refusing to answer the question. How easy would it have been for them to say, under oath, that Trump had never asked them to lean on the FBI to end the investigation if indeed he hadn't done so? Easy-peasy... unless they knew that saying that, under oath, would be perjury. When they are "interrogated" by Mueller, they will not be allowed to use this non-answer as an out, and I suspect when they tell Mueller/grand jury the exact words Trump used when discussing the Russia investigation with them, a pattern of attempted obstruction will emerge even more strongly.
Click to expand...

It's possible. I just worry that any truth can get out after their performance in front of the committee. That was insane. No legal basis to not answer the question just... "I'm not going to answer cause I don't feel like it." That's nuts. Should've been immediate grounds for contempt charges IMO. If they can pull that there I'm wondering if they'll pull that everywhere when asked.
 
TheGoverness said:
It will end when Mueller has concluded his investigation.
Click to expand...

Which he will hopefully do asap. But I am less optimistic about the squawking having a stop.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom