• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

DOJ ends Holder-era ‘slush fund’ payouts to outside groups

Erod

DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 28, 2008
Messages
15,483
Reaction score
8,227
Location
North Texas
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Conservative
DOJ ends Holder-era ?slush fund? payouts to outside groups | Fox News

The Justice Department announced Wednesday it will no longer allow prosecutors to strike settlement agreements with big companies directing them to make payouts to outside groups, ending an Obama-era practice that Republicans decried as a “slush fund” that padded the accounts of liberal interest groups.

In a memo sent to 94 U.S. attorneys' offices early Wednesday, Attorney General Jeff Sessions said he would end the practice that allowed companies to meet settlement burdens by giving money to groups that were neither victims nor parties to the case.

Sessions said the money should, instead, go to the Treasury Department or victims.

“When the federal government settles a case against a corporate wrongdoer, any settlement funds should go first to the victims and then to the American people—not to bankroll third-party special interest groups or the political friends of whoever is in power,” Sessions said in a statement.
Conservatives have long fought the policy introduced under the Obama administration. Earlier this year, Republican lawmakers introduced legislation that would prohibit the Department of Justice from requiring defendants to donate money to outside groups, after concerns that the settlements bypass congressional appropriations processes.

“This bill is oversight and action. Congress must not tolerate Justice Department political appointees using settlements to funnel money to their liberal friends,” Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., who introduced the bill, said in a statement. “This is also an institutional issue. Once direct victims have been compensated, deciding what to do with additional funds recovered from defendants becomes a policy question properly decided by elected representatives in Congress, not agency bureaucrats or prosecutors.”

My God, was there any end to the depth of corruption during the Obama administration?
 
This is pretty disgusting. Not sure how anyone could argue with the quoted statement:

"“When the federal government settles a case against a corporate wrongdoer, any settlement funds should go first to the victims and then to the American people—not to bankroll third-party special interest groups or the political friends of whoever is in power,”

I don't care if the 3rd party feeds the homeless, it is not an appropriate use for a bureaucrat to decide the use of corporate settlement funds.
 
The practice predates the Obama administration. This Forbes article gives some examples of how it has been used. https://www.forbes.com/sites/legaln...h-funds-created-by-doj-lawsuits/#74bc0a3b44a8

Two examples are

1. DOJ forced Gibson Guitars to pay a $50,000 “community service payment” to the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation even though the foundation was not a victim of the alleged crime and had no direct connection to the case.

2. DOJ forced a wastewater plant that had been accused of violating the Clean Water Act to give $1 million to the U.S. Coast Guard Alumni Association.

In a two-year period DOJ funneled 1 billion dollars to various organizations. And no, they weren't all left wing groups. But while the left-wing group accusation was exaggerated, I fully support stopping this practice. I agree that DOJ employees shouldn't be deciding where the extra money goes. That should be up to Congress.
 
Last edited:
This Forbes article gives some examples of how it has been used. https://www.forbes.com/sites/legaln...h-funds-created-by-doj-lawsuits/#74bc0a3b44a8

Two examples are

1. DOJ forced Gibson Guitars to pay a $50,000 “community service payment” to the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation even though the foundation was not a victim of the alleged crime and had no direct connection to the case.

2. DOJ forced a wastewater plant that had been accused of violating the Clean Water Act to give $1 million to the U.S. Coast Guard Alumni Association.

In a two-year period DOJ funneled 1 billion dollars to various organizations. And no, they weren't all left wing groups. But while the left-wing group accusation was exaggerated, I fully support stopping this practice. I agree that DOJ employees shouldn't be deciding where the extra money goes. That should be up to Congress.

It all smells like inside corruption for sure.
 
It all smells like inside corruption for sure.

I would really like to see this trail of money. This has gone largely under the radar. I would be very surprised if a good portion of this money didn't end up enriching people who are owed a favor, did something for those in power, etc...
 
It all smells like inside corruption for sure.

At the very least it gives the appearance of impropriety, which should be avoided in government. That Coast Guard Alumni donation was made under the Bush Administration. The National Fish and Wildlife one was made under Obama. It is hard to believe political lean doesn't affect the choices.
 
Back
Top Bottom