• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

House Intelligence Panel Issues Seven Subpoenas in Russia Probe

Tangmo said:
Neither Obama nor Clinton are in Putin's pocket...nor were they ever Putin operatives.

Trump is conversely in Putin's back pocket. Kissing whatever it is he feels there.

It is a Big Fail to think there is a similarity or equivalency between Republican investigations of the political opposition and the present investigations of Trump and his boyz that are being done by the FBI counter espionage section.

Moreover, Obama did not fire Comey nor did Clinton call for a firing. OB did as I'd pointed out leave Comey to Trump, and wisely so for OB. This potus is instead in the pocket of the KGB successor, which is Putin.

So I'm beginning to see how the states of the Union felt when the states of the Confederacy turned their colors and coats. Which is what some people are doing in the present time vis a vis Russia. And it starts in the Oval Office.
Click to expand...

You have zero proof that Trump is in Putin's pocket, other than your uber partisan OPINION.
 
hanger4 said:
Here is another explanation you can ignore;

Obama Administration Admits to FISA Court Its NSA Illegally Spied on Americans
Click to expand...

You probably remember I gave you kudos for a good link in reference to Intelligence and FISO terms, and specifically masking and unmasking. That link led to an article published by CNN.

An article published by Legal Insurrection brings more suspicion and less credibility, don't you think?

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/legal-insurrection/
 
Trippy Trekker said:
You probably remember I gave you kudos for a good link in reference to Intelligence and FISO terms, and specifically masking and unmasking. That link led to an article published by CNN.

An article published by Legal Insurrection brings more suspicion and less credibility, don't you think?

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/legal-insurrection/
Click to expand...

Mediabiasfactcheck also rates CNN and MSNBC as left of center mixed.

Doesn't matter much anyway, Absentglare doesn't seem to care to much for actually discussing topics, but rather discussing posters.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom