• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Top Trump aide: Coal doesn't make 'much sense anymore'

poweRob

USMC 1988-1996
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 18, 2011
Messages
83,639
Reaction score
58,266
Location
New Mexico
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
Is this a part of the "Art of the Deal?"


Top Trump aide: Coal doesn't make 'much sense anymore'

"For those miners, get ready because you're going to be working your asses off," Trump said in a May 2016 speech in front of a crowd holding up "Trump digs coal" signs.

"Coal doesn't even make that much sense anymore as a feedstock," Gary Cohn said, aboard Air Force One on Thursday, referring to raw materials that get converted into a fuel.
Cohn, who serves as director of the White House National Economic Council, instead praised natural gas as "such a cleaner fuel" -- and one that America has become an "abundant producer of."

While Trump rarely talks up the potential of renewable energy, Cohn sounds like a fan.

"If you think about how solar and how much wind power we've created in the United States, we can be a manufacturing powerhouse and still be environmentally friendly," Cohn said.​

Renewables you say? Coal makes no sense anymore you say?
 
It's hard to deny the trend.....and the trend is toward renewable energy.
 
Is this a part of the "Art of the Deal?"


Top Trump aide: Coal doesn't make 'much sense anymore'

"For those miners, get ready because you're going to be working your asses off," Trump said in a May 2016 speech in front of a crowd holding up "Trump digs coal" signs.

"Coal doesn't even make that much sense anymore as a feedstock," Gary Cohn said, aboard Air Force One on Thursday, referring to raw materials that get converted into a fuel.
Cohn, who serves as director of the White House National Economic Council, instead praised natural gas as "such a cleaner fuel" -- and one that America has become an "abundant producer of."

While Trump rarely talks up the potential of renewable energy, Cohn sounds like a fan.

"If you think about how solar and how much wind power we've created in the United States, we can be a manufacturing powerhouse and still be environmentally friendly," Cohn said.​

Renewables you say? Coal makes no sense anymore you say?

Well, I am all for the environment...but what to do about those 65,000 coal miners located around the USA, nearly 40,000 of them located in West Virginia and the Appalachia region?

https://www.eia.gov/coal/annual/pdf/table14.pdf

See, my problem with utopian ideas is that some people make it and some people lose out.

For instance, we get cheaper goods from trade agreements...at the cost of manufacturing jobs here in the USA and sweat shop, near slave labor overseas. But hey, we love those little plastic items and "cheap" clothes right?

Too bad there is no alternative employment for our growing population.
 
"Cohn, who serves as director of the White House National Economic Council, instead praised natural gas as "such a cleaner fuel" -- and one that America has become an "abundant producer of."

Yep, let's get those job retraining programs going for Appalachia and elsewhere. The manufacturing jobs will not come back in any significant number.
 
Well, I am all for the environment...but what to do about those 65,000 coal miners located around the USA, nearly 40,000 of them located in West Virginia and the Appalachia region?

https://www.eia.gov/coal/annual/pdf/table14.pdf

See, my problem with utopian ideas is that some people make it and some people lose out.

For instance, we get cheaper goods from trade agreements...at the cost of manufacturing jobs here in the USA and sweat shop, near slave labor overseas. But hey, we love those little plastic items and "cheap" clothes right?

Too bad there is no alternative employment for our growing population.

Are you for government subsidies for the coal industry?
Because there's the answer for you.
 
Are you for government subsidies for the coal industry?
Because there's the answer for you.

Lets not forget farm subsidies originally designed to help small farmers diversify crops, but used today by conglomerates like Monsanto instead.

Go ahead and miss the point as usual. There are millions of Americans facing a job crunch with massive competition for fewer real opportunities as it is.

Something all those people who went to college accruing major student loan debt to get a degree in underwater basket weaving, or women's studies, etc., are finding out in the current job market.

Places like West Virginia and Appalachia have no other industry, and some people actually want to work and earn a living rather then live on a the dole.

No jobs? Expect a flood of new mouths to feed rushing to cities in hopes of something that isn't there.
 
Last edited:
Lets not forget farm subsidies originally designed to help small farmers diversify crops, but used today by conglomerates like Monsanto instead.

Go ahead and miss the point as usual. There are millions of Americans facing a job crunch with massive competition as it is.

Place like West Virginia and Appalachia have no other industry, and some people actually want to work and earn a living rather then live on a the dole.

It's a big country.
Time to pick themselves up by their bootstraps and adapt!

There are job openings in renewable energy.
 
Well, I am all for the environment...but what to do about those 65,000 coal miners located around the USA, nearly 40,000 of them located in West Virginia and the Appalachia region?

https://www.eia.gov/coal/annual/pdf/table14.pdf

See, my problem with utopian ideas is that some people make it and some people lose out.

For instance, we get cheaper goods from trade agreements...at the cost of manufacturing jobs here in the USA and sweat shop, near slave labor overseas. But hey, we love those little plastic items and "cheap" clothes right?

Too bad there is no alternative employment for our growing population.

Yeah, it sucks, but are we going to stop progress because of it? Are we going to damage the planet? It's just not worth it to prop up this industry because they are fading out technologically and damaging the environment.
 
Well, I am all for the environment...but what to do about those 65,000 coal miners located around the USA, nearly 40,000 of them located in West Virginia and the Appalachia region?

https://www.eia.gov/coal/annual/pdf/table14.pdf

See, my problem with utopian ideas is that some people make it and some people lose out.

For instance, we get cheaper goods from trade agreements...at the cost of manufacturing jobs here in the USA and sweat shop, near slave labor overseas. But hey, we love those little plastic items and "cheap" clothes right?

Too bad there is no alternative employment for our growing population.

A government program could be created specifically to retrain them for other jobs.
 
Well, I am all for the environment...but what to do about those 65,000 coal miners located around the USA, nearly 40,000 of them located in West Virginia and the Appalachia region?

https://www.eia.gov/coal/annual/pdf/table14.pdf

See, my problem with utopian ideas is that some people make it and some people lose out.

For instance, we get cheaper goods from trade agreements...at the cost of manufacturing jobs here in the USA and sweat shop, near slave labor overseas. But hey, we love those little plastic items and "cheap" clothes right?

Too bad there is no alternative employment for our growing population.

So, a libertarian arguing against the free hand of capitalism. The world is so upside-down right now.

A government program could be created specifically to retrain them for other jobs.

Yes, and there is where I like liberalism. Not "hand-outs" but a like investment to give those hurt a boost up...
 
Well, I am all for the environment...but what to do about those 65,000 coal miners located around the USA, nearly 40,000 of them located in West Virginia and the Appalachia region?

https://www.eia.gov/coal/annual/pdf/table14.pdf

See, my problem with utopian ideas is that some people make it and some people lose out.

For instance, we get cheaper goods from trade agreements...at the cost of manufacturing jobs here in the USA and sweat shop, near slave labor overseas. But hey, we love those little plastic items and "cheap" clothes right?

Too bad there is no alternative employment for our growing population.
There are 65,000 coal workers and 600,000 solar workers. Last month we lost 60,000 retail jobs. There is an over-emphasis on the importance of coal. The U.S. can afford to just pay the coal workers a set amount for life and move off of coal being a policy setting issue.
 
Many of you are completely missing the point. Even my dog knows that coal is getting it's ass kicked due to cleaner and cheaper forms of producing energy. The point was Trump promised the coal miners he'd get their jobs back and they voted for him for it. Now he's changed his position 180 degrees like he has on many things, and could care less about the miners.
 
So, a libertarian arguing against the free hand of capitalism. The world is so upside-down right now.

Yes, and there is where I like liberalism. Not "hand-outs" but a like investment to give those hurt a boost up...

I've never believed in a "free hand of capitalism," which I've always labled "rapacious capitalism." I've always advocated the reasoned hand of enlightened capitalism.

Greed is not good. Profit is good; self-advancement is good; being all one can be on one's own merit is good.

But one can still become rich without hoarding wealth...pay a little back to those who work for you, because happy workers are more productive and loyal. Take care of your customer's because happy customers will keep coming back for more.
 
Well, I am all for the environment...but what to do about those 65,000 coal miners located around the USA, nearly 40,000 of them located in West Virginia and the Appalachia region?

Hillary Clinton had the answer, but they went with the candidate who told them what they wanted to hear rather than the truth.
 
I've never believed in a "free hand of capitalism," which I've always labled "rapacious capitalism." I've always advocated the reasoned hand of enlightened capitalism.

Greed is not good. Profit is good; self-advancement is good; being all one can be on one's own merit is good.

But one can still become rich without hoarding wealth...pay a little back to those who work for you, because happy workers are more productive and loyal. Take care of your customer's because happy customers will keep coming back for more.

On that sir, I agree.
 
Well, I am all for the environment...but what to do about those 65,000 coal miners located around the USA, nearly 40,000 of them located in West Virginia and the Appalachia region?

https://www.eia.gov/coal/annual/pdf/table14.pdf

See, my problem with utopian ideas is that some people make it and some people lose out.

For instance, we get cheaper goods from trade agreements...at the cost of manufacturing jobs here in the USA and sweat shop, near slave labor overseas. But hey, we love those little plastic items and "cheap" clothes right?

Too bad there is no alternative employment for our growing population.

nobody is preaching utopia ideas here. Coal isn't coming back because it's not so economical anymore. And even if it does, the days of giong down into a mine for coal are all but over. They are mountain-topping for coal anymore and that requires less employment.

I agree that there needs to be a focus on helping those regions get more jobs but you can't deal with the republicans on that because the instant pushback is that its not the job of the federal government to do anything like that.
 
nobody is preaching utopia ideas here. Coal isn't coming back because it's not so economical anymore. And even if it does, the days of giong down into a mine for coal are all but over. They are mountain-topping for coal anymore and that requires less employment.

I agree that there needs to be a focus on helping those regions get more jobs but you can't deal with the republicans on that because the instant pushback is that its not the job of the federal government to do anything like that.

That is my essential point. Those regions have no other real avenues for employment. Coal is the major resource and has been the backbone of those economies for generations.

I have no problem with environmental improvement options, in fact I support this.

The problem is, we tend to go for the quick advantage without taking the consequences on large segments of our society and the economy itself into consideration.

Look what happened to the "rust belt" and how they responded in the last election.

If you are going to effect change, be prepared to fix the problems created too.
 
That is my essential point. Those regions have no other real avenues for employment. Coal is the major resource and has been the backbone of those economies for generations.

I have no problem with environmental improvement options, in fact I support this.

The problem is, we tend to go for the quick advantage without taking the consequences on large segments of our society and the economy itself into consideration.

Look what happened to the "rust belt" and how they responded in the last election.

If you are going to effect change, be prepared to fix the problems created too.

What do you propose? The federal government step in and make jobs for them? Is so, How? Subsidize buggy whip factories the likes of subsidizing coal?
 
What do you propose? The federal government step in and make jobs for them? Is so, How? Subsidize buggy whip factories the likes of subsidizing coal?

Not make jobs, no.

But set up retraining programs, perhaps for other mining work, or even work in the new technologies. Meanwhile paying wages for their "work" to learn the new skills...but only for so long as they are truly applying themselves to the successful completion of the re-training program.

Better than simply adding more people to the welfare rolls.

It disturbs me that people always look forward and say "more jobs for our kids," forgetting the adults who have nowehere to go and no training to compete for the jobs created by the new technology.
 
Last edited:
Not make jobs, no.

But set up retraining programs, perhaps for other mining work, or even work in the new technologies. Meanwhile paying wages for their "work" to learn the new skills...but only for so long as they are truly applying themselves to the successful completion of the re-training program.

Better than simply adding more people to the welfare rolls.

It disturbs me that people always look forward and say "more jobs for our kids," forgetting the adults who have nowehere to go and no training to compete for the jobs created by the new technology.

You are sounding like a dem with the federal funding for retraining programs and whatnot.

Any other people at any other time doing any other work... they are generally faced with the GOP saying, "Well if there are no jobs where you are at, then move". But when it comes to coal, we need to do something for them. I find this inconsistency interesting.
 
Is this a part of the "Art of the Deal?"


Top Trump aide: Coal doesn't make 'much sense anymore'

"For those miners, get ready because you're going to be working your asses off," Trump said in a May 2016 speech in front of a crowd holding up "Trump digs coal" signs.

"Coal doesn't even make that much sense anymore as a feedstock," Gary Cohn said, aboard Air Force One on Thursday, referring to raw materials that get converted into a fuel.
Cohn, who serves as director of the White House National Economic Council, instead praised natural gas as "such a cleaner fuel" -- and one that America has become an "abundant producer of."

While Trump rarely talks up the potential of renewable energy, Cohn sounds like a fan.

"If you think about how solar and how much wind power we've created in the United States, we can be a manufacturing powerhouse and still be environmentally friendly," Cohn said.​

Renewables you say? Coal makes no sense anymore you say?

And there's a lot of concern in coal country about losing health insurance. Trump will fire Cohn this week!
 
Well, I am all for the environment...but what to do about those 65,000 coal miners located around the USA, nearly 40,000 of them located in West Virginia and the Appalachia region?

https://www.eia.gov/coal/annual/pdf/table14.pdf

See, my problem with utopian ideas is that some people make it and some people lose out.

No, it seems you have a problem with what we call 'life'.

There are winners and loser no matter what happens, and it has nothing to do whatsoever with 'utopian ideals'.

Coal is dirty and not renewable. Those who stake their futures on it aren't likely to have much of one.
 
Well, I am all for the environment...but what to do about those 65,000 coal miners located around the USA, nearly 40,000 of them located in West Virginia and the Appalachia region?

https://www.eia.gov/coal/annual/pdf/table14.pdf

See, my problem with utopian ideas is that some people make it and some people lose out.

For instance, we get cheaper goods from trade agreements...at the cost of manufacturing jobs here in the USA and sweat shop, near slave labor overseas. But hey, we love those little plastic items and "cheap" clothes right?

Too bad there is no alternative employment for our growing population.

I mean whale blubber stopped being a product at some point and whalers lost most of their jobs. **** happens. Hell, I fly planes for a living and computers'll probably replace me eventually.
 
Is this a part of the "Art of the Deal?"


Top Trump aide: Coal doesn't make 'much sense anymore'

"For those miners, get ready because you're going to be working your asses off," Trump said in a May 2016 speech in front of a crowd holding up "Trump digs coal" signs.

"Coal doesn't even make that much sense anymore as a feedstock," Gary Cohn said, aboard Air Force One on Thursday, referring to raw materials that get converted into a fuel.
Cohn, who serves as director of the White House National Economic Council, instead praised natural gas as "such a cleaner fuel" -- and one that America has become an "abundant producer of."

While Trump rarely talks up the potential of renewable energy, Cohn sounds like a fan.

"If you think about how solar and how much wind power we've created in the United States, we can be a manufacturing powerhouse and still be environmentally friendly," Cohn said.​

Renewables you say? Coal makes no sense anymore you say?

:lol: I guess it's safe for them to say that now that the election is over and the dummies' votes have all been counted.
 
Back
Top Bottom