• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Senate Intelligence Committee votes to give leaders solo subpoena power

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
94,109
Reaction score
82,382
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Senate Intelligence Committee votes to give leaders solo subpoena power


By Karoun Demirjian
May 25, 2017

The Senate Intelligence Committee voted Thursday to give its top Republican and Democrat “blanket authority” to issue subpoenas for the duration of its probe into alleged Russian meddling in the 2016 elections, according to the committee chairman. Committee Chairman Richard Burr (R-N.C.) told reporters that the vote to leave subpoena decisions up to himself and vice chairman Mark R. Warner (D-Va.) was unanimous. He would not say when, or with whom, he and Warner planned to exercise their new authority. The move may be a sign that congressional investigators are anticipating a fight in their efforts to compel certain witnesses to cooperate with their probe, and want to accelerate the process by which the committee can subpoena testimony or documents from people involved.

They have already encountered resistance from Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, the former national security adviser, who notified the committee through his lawyers this week that he would not comply with a subpoena request for documents detailing contacts he had with Russian officials between June 16, 2015, and Jan. 20, 2017, invoking his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. The committee responded by narrowing the focus of their subpoena for records from Flynn, and by issuing two new subpoenas for records from Flynn’s Virginia-based businesses. The committee has not yet announced plans for additional subpoenas, though they are seeking documents and testimony from other members of President Trump’s campaign and transition teams.
Legally, Congress has the authority to arrest any witnesses ignoring a subpoena and directly try them for contempt, an anachronistic step that hasn’t been invoked since 1935. More realistically, Congress can send a contempt referral to the Department of Justice for prosecution, or send a contempt complaint to a federal court for enforcement by court order.
 
Senate Intelligence Committee votes to give leaders solo subpoena power



Legally, Congress has the authority to arrest any witnesses ignoring a subpoena and directly try them for contempt, an anachronistic step that hasn’t been invoked since 1935. More realistically, Congress can send a contempt referral to the Department of Justice for prosecution, or send a contempt complaint to a federal court for enforcement by court order.

What Police force do they have to enforce this?
The SP cannot have documents being reviewed/used for an investigation available to the House or the Senate.
That is from what I understand just the way it works with an SP.
 
Senate Intelligence Committee votes to give leaders solo subpoena power



Legally, Congress has the authority to arrest any witnesses ignoring a subpoena and directly try them for contempt, an anachronistic step that hasn’t been invoked since 1935. More realistically, Congress can send a contempt referral to the Department of Justice for prosecution, or send a contempt complaint to a federal court for enforcement by court order.

We are certainly in a hysterical mood now and the state of the union is in irrational bickering mode.

But the idea of Congress arresting someone is cool.
 
Back
Top Bottom