• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Appeals Court Will Not Reinstate Trump’s Revised Travel Ban

danarhea

danarhea

Slayer of the DP Newsbot
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 27, 2005
Messages
43,602
Reaction score
26,256
Location
Houston, TX
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Fenton said:
Lol...
Im shocked !! Im sure the only thing that makes this unconstitutonal according to the 4rth is that Trump made the order.
Click to expand...

Then you should really consider actually reading the order. It would likely clear some things up for you.
Something tells me if HRC had made it it would have been fine.
This is unbeleivable
Click to expand...

Yes, and that something is called, 'imagination'.
 
Fenton said:
Lol...
Im shocked !! Im sure the only thing that makes this unconstitutonal according to the 4rth is that Trump made the order.

Something tells me if HRC had made it it would have been fine.
This is unbeleivable
Click to expand...

Um, as much as I dislike Hillary, she wouldn't have made that order. And what makes it unconstitutional is not some silly ass spin about how political it was. What makes it unconstitutional is that the court ruled it so. I am willing to make a gentleman's bet with you that the conservative leaning Supreme Court will uphold this decision.
 
They did the same thing as the others.
They blamed what wasn't written into the EO.
 
danarhea said:
Um, as much as I dislike Hillary, she wouldn't have made that order. And what makes it unconstitutional is not some silly ass spin about how political it was. What makes it unconstitutional is that the court ruled it so. I am willing to make a gentleman's bet with you that the conservative leaning Supreme Court will uphold this decision.
Click to expand...

Whether or not she would have made the order is irrelevent

The Judiciary applying two seperate standards is the issue..

ACLU lawyer arguing against Trumps travel ban admits it would be Constitutional under a Hillary Clinton presidency
Blog: ACLU lawyer admits Trump travel ban would be constitutional if Hillary had issued it
 
bubbabgone said:
They did the same thing as the others.
They blamed what wasn't written into the EO.
Click to expand...

Yup, and after the Manchester attack this is especially dispicable
 
winning.jpg
 
Good.

It is xenophobic-based nonsense.

I don't care why the court blocked this - I am glad it did.

Restricting travel on the basis of religion (which this is no matter who says otherwise) is cowardly and ridiculous.


Just like the cause for massive drug crime is the actual law making many drugs illegal. Without the law, the crime would virtually end, just like it did after Prohibition died.

The reason for 'Islamic extremist' terrorism is the immoral and often illegal military and political incursions of the West into the internal affairs of Middle Eastern and African nations.
Stop budding in where it is none of your business (except with humanitarian and peace keeping) and the terrorist attacks will eventually stop.


But like most people who are too ignorant to see the flaw in the 'War on Drugs'. Many of these same people are too ignorant to see the gigantic flaw in the 'War on Terror'.


Islam is not the source of the terror attacks. American/western foreign policy is.
 
Last edited:
DA60 said:
Good.

It is xenophobic-based nonsense.

I don't care why the court blocked this - I am glad it did.

Restricting travel on the basis of religion (which this is no matter who says otherwise) is cowardly and ridiculous.


Just like the cause for massive drug crime is the actual law making many drugs illegal. Without the law, the crime would virtually end, just like it did after Prohibition died.

The reason for 'Islamic extremist' terrorism is the immoral and often illegal military and political incursions of the Weest into the internal affairs of Middle Eastern and African nations.
Stop budding in where it is none of your business (except with humanitarian and peace keeping) and the terrorist attacks will eventually stop.


But like most people who are too stupid/ignorant to see the flaw in the 'War on Drugs'. Many of these same people are too stupid/ignorant to see the gigantic flaw in the 'War on Terror'.


Islam is not the source of the terror attacks. American/western foreign policy is.
Click to expand...

Ron Paul called this "blowback".
 
danarhea said:
Ron Paul called this "blowback".
Click to expand...

Yup...I am SO sorry that he did not win the Presidency.

I did not agree with him about everything.

But the world would probably be a hell of a lot safer...especially for Americans.
 
danarhea said:
Um, as much as I dislike Hillary, she wouldn't have made that order. And what makes it unconstitutional is not some silly ass spin about how political it was. What makes it unconstitutional is that the court ruled it so. I am willing to make a gentleman's bet with you that the conservative leaning Supreme Court will uphold this decision.
Click to expand...

Modifying your wager, I'll wager Donald Trump is counting on the opposite outcome.......
 
DA60 said:
Yup...I am SO sorry that he did not win the Presidency.

I did not agree with him about everything.

But the world would probably be a hell of a lot safer...especially for Americans.
Click to expand...

I had the bumper sticker "Paul for President 2008" on my car until recently, when the car was totaled in an accident. Otherwise it would have stayed on that car for many more years. Did I support and vote for Ron Paul in 2008? The answer to that question is obvious. LOL. I voted for Paul in the primaries, and for the Libertarian candidate in the general. :)
 
Rexedgar said:
Modifying your wager, I'll wager Donald Trump is counting on the opposite outcome.......
Click to expand...

You win that bet. Trump IS expecting that. He is that dumb. :mrgreen:
 
danarhea said:
I had the bumper sticker "Paul for President 2008" on my car until recently, when the car was totaled in an accident. Otherwise it would have stayed on that car for many more years. Did I support and vote for Ron Paul in 2008? The answer to that question is obvious. LOL. I voted for Paul in the primaries, and for the Libertarian candidate in the general. :)
Click to expand...

Cool!

I still regularly view his channel:

Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity
 
danarhea said:
An opinion from some political hack's blog is not evidence.
Click to expand...

Not exactly a opinion, the article actually quotes the Lawyer arguing against the directive.

Read it.
 
JamesBY said:
Trump's bans are, of course, unconstitutional.
Click to expand...

Its not Unconstitutional until the Supreme Court rules thats its Unconstitutional or kicks it back to lower courts.
 
The SCOTUS will overturn this ruling. The logic used to come to their decision is pathetically political. Law had nothing to do with it.

Tim-
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom