• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Republican candidate 'body-slams' Guardian reporter in Montana

Mustachio said:
Here's a quote from you from the Trayvon Martin thread:



So did Gianforte "earn his death" or are you a complete partisan hack and hypocrite?
Click to expand...

Nice research!
 
Jack Hays said:
I just don't like gender identity bigots.
Click to expand...

Then why aren't you confronting all of the posters in this thread who are immaturely assailing the manhood of the reporter who was assaulted?
 
Paperview said:
Is the term message board foreign to you?

I swear, your posts are getting more and more bizarre with each day.
Click to expand...

"Message board" was not the apparent usage. It seemed "board" as in "board of directors" was intended.
 
JasperL said:
Reporters get paid to ask questions, so Ben Jacobs was in fact doing his job. And being subjected to questions, even by 'aggressive' political reporters (which is all the good ones) doesn't make a candidate a 'victim of harassment.' It's a normal part of a politician's job.
Click to expand...

Now that GOPs are in power, especially in special elections where they own the seat, they don't want to have to answer questions about trumpcare, preexisting conditions, Medicaid cuts, tax cuts for the rich, trump's disastrous budget, etc.

If DEMs want to be reelected or elected, they better start diversifying their message and tailor it to their constituents or GTHO and let others in who will represent their constituents.

Of the 7 downstate CDs in IL, only one was won by a DEM, by 20 points, though trump won it by 1 point. She gets scorned all the time by city liberals. She doesn't represent city liberals.

121,000 Montana voters voted for trump and the DEM Governor. Quist went way too far to the left, only inviting in Sanders. Only the Bullocks and Testers can get elected in these states, and not as phonies .
 
Jack Hays said:
"Message board" was not the apparent usage. It seemed "board" as in "board of directors" was intended.
Click to expand...

Kind of a reach ........IMO
 
Jack Hays said:
On the contrary, I remain sane by indifference to lunacy here. It's therapy.
Click to expand...

But you keep posting articles you have found with no accompanying comments..........sanity/lunacy are on either side of the coin!
 
Jack Hays said:
On the contrary, I remain sane by indifference to lunacy here. It's therapy.
Click to expand...

"Pajama Boy" seems to be an Obama creation so I'm not sure why that should be an issue.

Pajama Boy, An Insufferable Man-Child. Pajama Boy'splace in Internet infamy was secured as soon as the insufferable man-child was tweeted out by Organizing for America. ... And, sure enough, Pajama Boy is wearing pajamas—a zip-up onesie in classic Lamar Alexander plaid—and drinking hot chocolate.Dec 19, 2013

Pajama Boy, An Insufferable Man-Child - POLITICO Magazine

www.politico.com/.../opinion-rich-lowry-obamacare-affordable-care-act-pajama-boy-an...



 
Jack Hays said:
I responded to a clear case of bigotry. Glad to see you rallying in defense of the bigot. Well done.
Click to expand...

You weren't responding to bigotry at all.
You were responding to Paperview's confrontation of hypocrisy.

And I return your accolades for demonstrating your deeply held hostility toward our nation's protections of a free press.
Well done yourself.
 
Rexedgar said:
But you keep posting articles you have found with no accompanying comments..........sanity/lunacy are on either side of the coin!
Click to expand...

When I don't comment it's because I believe the articles speak for themselves.
 
RickJames3000 said:
You weren't responding to bigotry at all.
You were responding to Paperview's confrontation of hypocrisy.

And I return your accolades for demonstrating your deeply held hostility toward our nation's protections of a free press.
Well done yourself.
Click to expand...

It was clear bigotry. Superfluous and irrelevant introduction into the discussion of a poster's supposed gender identity.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom