• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

White House looking at ethics rule to weaken special investigation: sources

Cardinal said:
For context, remember that Trump claimed that Judge Curiel was not fit to preside over the Trump University case because he was of Mexican descent. The context being that it really shouldn't be surprising to anybody that he will discredit anybody that will investigate him or has the potential to rule against him.

Trump may be a really awful President, but if there's one thing he knows how to do, it's survive.
Click to expand...

I knew Hilldog was a lying POS, but damn she could have at least acted the part, business as usual. It was far favorable to this clown car full of liars. Are long national nightmare has only just begun, we will have zero credibility left on the international stage.
 
Cardinal said:
Is that a promise?
Click to expand...

It is a promise to pretty much show that you believe anything regardless of the truth.
It only discredits you and your credibility.
 
Fiddytree said:
The fact that the last several weeks doesnt worry you as an American is concerning.

Sent from my LG-H910 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Show me evidence.
Not anonymous sources that are not verified.

Give me facts not conjecture.

If any of these so called news sources actually had any evidence or bothered to actually follow up with their sources to
Verify anything then well they might have some credibility.

So far we have a bunch of baseless allegations no evidence and all conjecture.
I am more concerned with the media leaking classified data to people than their anonymous sources.

You might bite at every lure that gets thrown in the water. I prefer fact and evidence.
You should have learned from the campaign just because the media prints it doesn't make it true.
 
yankintx said:
I knew Hilldog was a lying POS, but damn she could have at least acted the part, business as usual. It was far favorable to this clown car full of liars. Are long national nightmare has only just begun, we will have zero credibility left on the international stage.
Click to expand...

Congrats you just contradicted yourself.
 
Manc Skipper said:
A sentient human would be concerned. A trumpanzee....?
Click to expand...

A sentient person knows the difference between fact and non-fact, evidence and no evidence.
So far no evidence.
 
Cardinal said:
They won't. I've had to learn this lesson repeatedly throughout 2017. I remember the first lesson back in January (or February, I forget the exact date and I don't feel like googling it) when Trump first enacted the Muslim Ban, causing chaos at all the international airports across the United States. I was certain the Republicans in congress would step in to do something. I remember painfully the sinking feeling I got when I read the reaction of House Republicans: "Yeah, that's cool." That was the first time that I thought, "There are no good guys."

The last lesson was the McCarthy/Ryan story from a few days ago, as well as all the "strong" Republicans who talked of how "troubling" and "concerning" Trump's actions were when he shared confidential info with the Russians, and then did nothing. These guys are all in. As Ryan said, "We're family."
Click to expand...

It wasn't a Muslim ban see you can't even be honest in that.

Again the NSA knows more than you and at least 2 members of the NSA that were in the room have confirmed he didn't say anything or leak any information.

Again why can't you be honest?
 
Manc Skipper said:
A sentient human would be concerned. A trumpanzee....?
Click to expand...
It's been too long of a day to respond in a civil manner. But let's just say I don't have kind thoughts of the humans that continue to defend this.

Sent from my LG-H910 using Tapatalk
 
Cardinal said:
I thought you were going to disregard anything I had to say.
Click to expand...

I am simply pointing out your dishonesty that is all I have to do.
You obviously didn't read the rest of the post.
 
Fiddytree said:
It's been too long of a day to respond in a civil manner. But let's just say I don't have kind thoughts of the humans that continue to defend this.

Sent from my LG-H910 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Then You should have plenty of evidence to support your position.

So let us see the papers, notes, memos, transactions etc...
Anything that confirms any of these news paper story's.

Where is it all at?

Please post it.

Not anonymous sources or people near the White House bull****.

Let's see actual facts and data.
That is what I am waiting on.

For the investigation to actually gather real evidence and facts.
If he is guilty then he should be brought up on high crimes of office
And the house should start impeachment proceedings.
 
ludin said:
Then You should have plenty of evidence to support your position.

So let us see the papers, notes, memos, transactions etc...
Anything that confirms any of these news paper story's.

Where is it all at?

Please post it.

Not anonymous sources or people near the White House bull****.

Let's see actual facts and data.
That is what I am waiting on.

For the investigation to actually gather real evidence and facts.
If he is guilty then he should be brought up on high crimes of office
And the house should start impeachment proceedings.
Click to expand...
Ludin, I don't have the patience for credulity right now, so you won't get a response out me tonight.

Try Cardinal or Manc.

Sent from my LG-H910 using Tapatalk
 
Fiddytree said:
Ludin, I don't have the patience for credulity right now, so you won't get a response out me tonight.

Try Cardinal or Manc.

Sent from my LG-H910 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Thanks for supporting my argument then.
TDS is catching. You should probably avoid it.
 
ludin said:
A sentient person knows the difference between fact and non-fact, evidence and no evidence.
So far no evidence.
Click to expand...
Another person who doesn't know what evidence is.

You mean proof. So far there is no proof. There is plenty of evidence.
 
Slingshot Bob said:
Ditto if it was false, for his haters, point?
Click to expand...
What matters isn't whether this report is true, what matters is whether or not the Trump admin will follow through on this idea, so I don't know why Trump supporters would bother to deny something they would either support or look the other way on.
 
Slingshot Bob said:
Like what? Care to elaborate? Links would be awesome.(real links, even better)
Click to expand...

Thank you for helping to keep my thread at the top of the breaking news feed.
 
ludin said:
Then You should have plenty of evidence to support your position.

So let us see the papers, notes, memos, transactions etc...
Anything that confirms any of these news paper story's.

Where is it all at?

Please post it.

Not anonymous sources or people near the White House bull****.

Let's see actual facts and data.
That is what I am waiting on.

For the investigation to actually gather real evidence and facts.
If he is guilty then he should be brought up on high crimes of office
And the house should start impeachment proceedings.
Click to expand...

Show the evidence that proves Trumps innocence?
 
Taylor said:
Wow, now we're using "two people familiar with White House thinking" as sources. What's next - "some guy who likes white houses?" "a woman who once toured the oval office?" "a person intimately familiar with people named Donald?"
Click to expand...

About as much credibility as 'Rosenstein threatened to quite over Comey memo'
(Rosenstein said he didn't).

About as much credibility as 'Comey was going to ask for more money for Russian collusion investigation'
(McCabe testifies to congress the investigation properly resources)

About as much credibility as 'Trump obstructed justice by telling Comey to stop investigation of Flynn'
(Comey testifies before congress that no one interfered or obstructed the Flynn investigation)
(If Comey felt obstructed in his investigations, it would be a felony for him NOT to report it to his superiors in DOJ. He never did).

Trump gave classified secrets to the Russians during their White House meeting
(McMaster later game out and no that didn’t happen, and he WAS in those meetings)

Face it. Today’s ‘news’ media is little more than leftist propaganda from their echo chamber’s talking points, and should be credited with the credibility there of.
(which is to say none at all)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom