• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump Team Knew Flynn Was Under Investigation Before He Came to White House

Middleground said:
How eye-rolling ironic with that ****ing moniker. What do you call a President sexual predator rapist deviant?
Click to expand...
Answer: bill clintoon. A nitwit trying to equate President Donald J. Trump's history with women to bill clintoon's infamous long list of criminal behavior is a useful idiot who should butt smoke a bill clintoon cigar.
 
My suggestion for each and every disgruntled dirty diaper democRat is...Gather up all the evidence the sleazy marxist media has fed you, hop on your tricycles, pedal up to the White House and make a citizen's arrest. Don't forget to write and let me know how things go...

TRUMP/PENCE
 
poweRob said:
And why did he do that? Because these reactionary douches did it because it was the opposite of Obama's decision.
Click to expand...

Maybe, some Rs are definitely like that. I figured Flynn was dead in the water without him, and he figured it bought him loyalty. Next best thing to having dirt on someone of your own design.
I'm just glad Flynn is getting his..."You lie!"
 
Moderator's Warning:
100%Trump has been thread banned. Please do not quote and respond to him any further. The thread has been disrupted enough.

Thank you.
 
Verax said:
It's getting to the point where we're so desensitized to the incompetence it just doesn't matter any more.
Click to expand...

trumposters, and trumprotectors in congress, are desensitized. "Americans First" are not desensitized.

The last two scandals came back to Flynn again. What must he have on trump?

trump is probably pissed Flynn wasn't in the Oval Office with Kislyak and Lavrov .
 
Cardinal said:
It's a damn fire hose, now.



https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/17/...7&nl=breaking-news&nlid=65264959&ref=cta&_r=0

That's right, Obama's warning to Trump about Flynn, as well as Sally Yates warning to the White House later? Apparently those warnings weren't necessary. Trump put a foreign agent in charge of our National Security apparatus knowingly.
Click to expand...

Focus turns to Michael Flynn's work for Turkey, Russia | McClatchy Washington Bureau

WASHINGTON
One of the Trump administration’s first decisions about the fight against the Islamic State was made by Michael Flynn weeks before he was fired – and it conformed to the wishes of Turkey, whose interests, unbeknownst to anyone in Washington, he’d been paid more than $500,000 to represent.

The decision came 10 days before Donald Trump had been sworn in as president, in a conversation with President Barack Obama’s national security adviser, Susan Rice, who had explained the Pentagon’s plan to retake the Islamic State’s de facto capital of Raqqa with Syrian Kurdish forces whom the Pentagon considered the U.S.’s most effective military partners. Obama’s national security team had decided to ask for Trump’s sign-off, since the plan would all but certainly be executed after Trump had become president.

Flynn didn’t hesitate. According to timelines distributed by members of Congress in the weeks since, Flynn told Rice to hold off, a move that would delay the military operation for months.
Click to expand...
 
Top Cat said:
And in rushed the Trump apologist with a but, but Hillary..

Yawn.
Click to expand...
I think the Russians are broken. Someone probably needs to update their database with a more contemporary script.
 
Top Cat said:
And in rushed the Trump apologist with a but, but Hillary..

Yawn.
Click to expand...

Person: "Anybody have the time?"

Trumpster: "Hillary's a criminal, lock her up!!!!!"
 
Gina said:
Moderator's Warning:
100%Trump has been thread banned. Please do not quote and respond to him any further. The thread has been disrupted enough.

Thank you.
Click to expand...

Sock?
 
Cardinal said:
I think it's going to be very difficult for Pence to remain unscathed after this. The idea that Pence was unaware of Flynn's true status for that long requires the suspense of disbelief.
Click to expand...

Paul Ryan may end up as President when all is said and done.
 
Top Cat said:
Sock?
Click to expand...
Moderator's Warning:
Please don't reply to mod boxes. If you have concerns, please PM or use the Contact Us button.

Thank you!
 
DiAnna said:
Paul Ryan may end up as President when all is said and done.
Click to expand...

There really are no winners here, are there?

I know this sounds stupid, but what if there was a special election if it were concluded that collusion occurred? After all, if unlawful cheating had taken place, could an argument not be made for a...do-over?

Again, I'm perfectly aware of how dumb that sounds, but we don't exactly have a precedent for these times.
 
TheGoverness said:
Ewww.
Click to expand...

Cardinal said:
There really are no winners here, are there?

I know this sounds stupid, but what if there was a special election if it were concluded that collusion occurred? After all, if unlawful cheating had taken place, could an argument not be made for a...do-over?

Again, I'm perfectly aware of how dumb that sounds, but we don't exactly have a precedent for these times.
Click to expand...

I'm at the point where I'd welcome anyone but Trump... Pence, Ryan, hell even Rex Tillerson... would be better than the corrupt clown in the WH now.
 
Cardinal said:
There really are no winners here, are there?

I know this sounds stupid, but what if there was a special election if it were concluded that collusion occurred? After all, if unlawful cheating had taken place, could an argument not be made for a...do-over?

Again, I'm perfectly aware of how dumb that sounds, but we don't exactly have a precedent for these times.
Click to expand...

Seems a logical end should that happen.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom