• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

More U.S. Republicans back independent probe of Trump-Russia ties

Cardinal said:
There's no legal "activation" in assigning a special prosecutor or drafting articles of impeachment. They are political processes and can be done for offenses as little as chewing with one's mouth open, if Congress and the AG so chose.
Click to expand...

You haven't looked at the statute have you?
 
Winston said:
Which is why we need to put this behind us. It needs to come to a resolution, whether or not it's bad for Trump or bad for the Republicans. Right now, DC owes it to the country to cut the crap and give us the facts. If a special prosecutor will get us there, I'm for appointing one.

But, until the memo surfaces or we get a Comey testimony before Congress, we'll be stuck arguing with strangers online, lol :).
Click to expand...

We've been asking for answers and the truth for the last 8 years.
From Fast and Furious, to the billions lost propping up crony capitalist under Obama's green jobs scam to the IRS targeting Conservatives to Benghazi to Hillary's rogue server and we've been given a big " FU ! " by the media and the Democrats and their supporters.

Every scandal I mentioned had real substantial evidence to back up a SP and " DC owed " a explanation.

There is ZERO evidence to back up the Lefts demands for a special prosecutor, zero.
 
Praxas said:
Says the side that spent years and years supporting investigating BEEEEENGGGHHAAAAZII. Now that your man Trump is in you guys don't even want to spend a year on it like you did hounding Clinton. Time for the Behnghazi investigating supporters to take a STFU pill on the investigation into Trump.
Click to expand...

Do you think you will get a democrat in office as a result? I would think outing trump would be very detrimental to the cause. I guess I called it. He may hurt us short term...but trump will long term be good for us. Like an enema.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Fenton said:
We've been asking for answers and the truth for the last 8 years.
From Fast and Furious, to the billions lost propping up crony capitalist under Obama's green jobs scam to the IRS targeting Conservatives to Benghazi to Hillary's rogue server and we've been given a big " FU ! " by the media and the Democrats and their supporters.

Every scandal I mentioned had real substantial evidence to back up a SP and " DC owed " a explanation.

There is ZERO evidence to back up the Lefts demands for a special prosecutor, zero.
Click to expand...

Trump obstructing justice is more than enough evidence to appoint a SP. This looks devastating for Trump and his credibility. He fired Jim Comey because he wouldn't lay off his boy! Tough day for Trumpers.
 
Winston said:
Trump obstructing justice is more than enough evidence to appoint a SP. This looks devastating for Trump and his credibility. He fired Jim Comey because he wouldn't lay off his boy! Tough day for Trumpers.
Click to expand...

There you go again, making it up as you go along and Lol !
Everything is " devastating " to Trump to you people, you fly off into hysterics over anything you think might gain traction and when it doesnt, you move onto something else.

You have no evidence, no proof, hell you dont even have the memo so stop pretending you give a rats ass about truth and justice, your'e fooling no one

Produce the memo, its that easy. If its what the NYTs and the Dems claim it is lets see it
 
Fenton said:
There you go again, making it up as you go along and Lol !
Everything is " devastating " to Trump to you people, you fly off into hysterics over anything you think might gain traction and when it doesnt, you move onto something else.

You have no evidence, no proof, hell you dont even have the memo so stop pretending you give a rats ass about truth and justice, your'e fooling no onng

Produce the memo, its that easy. If its what the NYTs and the Dems claim it is lets see it
Click to expand...

Chaffetz said he's going to subpoena them. If the memo comes out it will be devastating. Not that it matters to trumpartisans
 
Fenton said:
There you go again, making it up as you go along and Lol !
Everything is " devastating " to Trump to you people, you fly off into hysterics over anything you think might gain traction and when it doesnt, you move onto something else.

You have no evidence, no proof, hell you dont even have the memo so stop pretending you give a rats ass about truth and justice, your'e fooling no one

Produce the memo, its that easy. If its what the NYTs and the Dems claim it is lets see it
Click to expand...

Not making anything up, plenty to condemn trump with. Are you comfortable knowing you would've supported Nixon on his way down too?
 
Winston said:
Chaffetz said he's going to subpoena them. If the memo comes out it will be devastating. Not that it matters to trumpartisans
Click to expand...

Subpoena ?!! Lol !

WaPo didnt need a subpoena to leak Flynns name. Months of illegal leaks and NOW the hacks in the media have grown a set of ethics ??

Honestly, when does the Left ever need to be forced to produce something thats legitimately damaging to a Republican ??

If that memo proved that Trump tried to shut down the investigation we wouldnt need a subpoena, it would be on the front page of every newspaper in America.
Same goes for any evidence that proves collusion.
This is just the media, Democrats and their supporters doing everything possible to undermine a Democratically elected President and man is it going to backfire

Big time, be careful what you wish for because this isnt going to play out Politically like you think it is.
 
Gill said:
I'm not defending Trump, I'm defending the legal fabric of this country. I was taught in school that people can't get railroaded by the legal system without proof of wrongdoing. I know today's public schools don't teach civics, but maybe you could look up the concept and educate yourself.

In the meantime, please feel free to enlighten me on this mountain of evidence linking Trump personally to Russia and their attempt to influence the election. By the way, there are a large number of investigations into the matter already. At last count, I believe there are at least four going on right now.
Click to expand...

For all your braggadocio about education, you don't seem to understand how our legal system works. First, the case begins with law enforcement officials. Now we know that law enforcement officials have been investigating ties between President Trump's associates and Russia. This is the state we are currently in: investigation. It is the phase where evidence is gathered, but not necessarily published.

After this phase, then suspected perpetrators may be taken to court to determine if the evidence demonstrates guilt.

Your attempt to prevent an investigation actually seeks to wipe its ass with our legal system for the sake of defending the pathetic con man that the most racist and ignorant presidential voting group in decades elected.
 
ludin said:
Correction someone made the charge of treason. I am asking for what evidence they have to come to that charge.
as I stated in my post not even the intelligence committee has such evidence.

so obviously they have some information or evidence that others in the government do not have.
Click to expand...

We have all the information we need to come to that potential risk assessment. President Trump's behavior is uniformly consistent with the theory that he is a Russian puppet, an actor of a hostile foreign power.
 
Gill said:
If Lois Lerner and the IRS scandal did not merit a special prosecutor, then this certainly does not. At this point, no one has produced a smidgen of evidence that Trump was involved with the Russians during the election.

Now if the Comey memorandum is produced and turns out to be authentic and contemporaneous, then things change significantly.
Click to expand...

Since you seem to want to tie two disparate and unrelated things together...
If Trump resigns like Lois Lerner did, there may be no need for a special prosecutor.
 
RickJames3000 said:
Since you seem to want to tie two disparate and unrelated things together...
If Trump resigns like Lois Lerner did, there may be no need for a special prosecutor.
Click to expand...

Lois Lerner admitted the IRS targeted Conservatives disproportionately, but of-course blamed it on nameless faceless front line agents.

She then went on to plead the 5th 25 times over.

There's zero evidence to back up your and every other Trump haters assertions that he did anything wrong
 
Last edited:
Fenton said:
Lois Lerner admConservhat the IRS targeted of Conservatives disproportionately, but of-course blamed it on nameless faceless front line agents.
Click to expand...

When replying to my posts, I'd prefer if you used standard English.
Thanks.
 
RickJames3000 said:
Since you seem to want to tie two disparate and unrelated things together...
If Trump resigns like Lois Lerner did, there may be no need for a special prosecutor.
Click to expand...

That would make my day.
 
Absentglare said:
For all your braggadocio about education, you don't seem to understand how our legal system works. First, the case begins with law enforcement officials. Now we know that law enforcement officials have been investigating ties between President Trump's associates and Russia. This is the state we are currently in: investigation. It is the phase where evidence is gathered, but not necessarily published.

After this phase, then suspected perpetrators may be taken to court to determine if the evidence demonstrates guilt.

Your attempt to prevent an investigation actually seeks to wipe its ass with our legal system for the sake of defending the pathetic con man that the most racist and ignorant presidential voting group in decades elected.
Click to expand...

Good to see you admit that the investigation is for Trump's "associates".

Please feel free to point out where I've tried to prevent an investigation.
 
Gill said:
Good to see you admit that the investigation is for Trump's "associates".

Please feel free to point out where I've tried to prevent an investigation.
Click to expand...

You were rambling incoherently about the fact that they have no evidence, implying that this makes any investigation a fraud. Perhaps you should be more careful with your language if you don't want to have such carelessness laid bare.
 
j-mac said:
Maybe in the land of Orwell.
Click to expand...
Maybe.

But in the real world of facts, it reigns supreme.

The fact that it's not your inspiration, does not mean it is not for other Americans.
 
Fenton said:
Lois Lerner admitted the IRS targeted Conservatives disproportionately, but of-course blamed it on nameless faceless front line agents.

She then went on to plead the 5th 25 times over.

There's zero evidence to back up your and every other Trump haters assertions that he did anything wrong
Click to expand...

Then why did the Senate intelligence committee subpoena Mike Flynn, if there's no evidence?
 
ludin said:
Your TDS is getting out of hand.
What proof do you have of treason?

So far not even the intelligence committee has such evidence.
Click to expand...

You guys are funny with your requests for more evidence than we already have before STARTING an investigation...the point of the investigation is to find out if there is evidence.

Evidence:
Russian interferred with our election through misinformation campaigns and hacking
Trump campaign officials have had contact with Russia and lied about it to Congress and the Vice President
Trump's alleged attempts to interfere with the investigation already on going
 
Absentglare said:
You were rambling incoherently about the fact that they have no evidence, implying that this makes any investigation a fraud. Perhaps you should be more careful with your language if you don't want to have such carelessness laid bare.
Click to expand...

You need to work on your recognization of "implying". You don't have it figured out yet.
 
Winston said:
How's your trump defense going today j-mac?
Click to expand...

I am confident things will be just fine....I actually was out Deep Sea fishing since I last posted, so wasn't paying attention.
 
Praxas said:
Says the side that spent years and years supporting investigating BEEEEENGGGHHAAAAZII. Now that your man Trump is in you guys don't even want to spend a year on it like you did hounding Clinton. Time for the Behnghazi investigating supporters to take a STFU pill on the investigation into Trump.
Click to expand...

At least with Benghazi there was there, there....So, I am sure that after a year, when Trump stonewall's like the Obama administration did there, then you'll be all fine with it right? :roll: Sure you will....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom