• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

House Passes Measure to Repeal and Replace the Affordable Care Act

Gimmesometruth said:
"Stable", an undefined, subjective term, used in a debate about undefined nations that supposedly were or were not. Again, pure rhetoric, no context, no content...just noise.

The Civil War was a war by and for the 1% of the Antebellum South that led to the most disruptive event in US history. The premise and context you earlier relied on....was and is....absurd.
Click to expand...

I see you have work to do. Good luck.
 
Gimmesometruth hit the nail on the head, the nail-heads like Jack and others are driven deep into the truth of the argument: the South was the cause of the Civil War because of slavery.
 
JamesBY said:
Gimmesometruth hit the nail on the head, the nail-heads like Jack and others are driven deep into the truth of the argument: the South was the cause of the Civil War because of slavery.
Click to expand...

I agree wholeheartedly that the South caused the Civil War because of slavery. GST was not arguing that point.
 
Jack Hays said:
I agree wholeheartedly that the South caused the Civil War because of slavery. GST was not arguing that point.
Click to expand...
Really? Once again you display an inability to comprehend an argument. When I said:

The Civil War was a war by and for the 1% of the Antebellum South that led to the most disruptive event in US history. The premise and context you earlier relied on....was and is....absurd.

...I simultaneously argued the 1% in the South did so because of their interest in slavery....AND....showed that ECONOMIC inequality lead to the most destabilizing event in US history.
 
Jack Hays said:
As I said, get back to me when you've learned enough to make an interesting argument.
Click to expand...
Your opinion on my argument is not a counter-argument.

For a person supposedly "uninterested", you sure pay it a lot of attention. You made this stupid argument in the past, I see you still make the same dumb argument.
 
Gimmesometruth said:
Really? Once again you display an inability to comprehend an argument. When I said:

The Civil War was a war by and for the 1% of the Antebellum South that led to the most disruptive event in US history. The premise and context you earlier relied on....was and is....absurd.

...I simultaneously argued the 1% in the South did so because of their interest in slavery....AND....showed that ECONOMIC inequality lead to the most destabilizing event in US history.
Click to expand...

No, you did not.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom