• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

FBI Translator Married ISIS Terrorist she was Investigating

akyron said:
Apples to apples. You might have to step back a little to see it if your partisan blinders are thick.

It's called objectivity.
Click to expand...
You should take your own partisan blinders off before lecturing others about theirs, Mr. Pot. Because anyone who would mindlessly argue for the Lost Cause and Intelligent Design like you are....doesn't know what objectivity is.

“Long-Legged Yankee Lies” – CIVIL WAR MEMORY

https://www.washingtonpost.com/post...d-monuments-are-wrong/?utm_term=.ebdd7b9219c3


It's called ignorance and revisionist partisan hackery....and the apples don't fall far from the tree.
 
Moot said:
You should take your own partisan blinders off before lecturing others about theirs, Mr. Pot. Because anyone who would mindlessly argue for the Lost Cause and Intelligent Design like you are....doesn't know what objectivity is.

“Long-Legged Yankee Lies” – CIVIL WAR MEMORY

https://www.washingtonpost.com/post...d-monuments-are-wrong/?utm_term=.ebdd7b9219c3


It's called ignorance and revisionist partisan hackery....and the apples don't fall far from the tree.
Click to expand...

Since that book you are arguing against is 122 years old I wonder who you think is alive that you are arguing against.

I will agree that you have some ignorance and partisan hackery in spades.
 
akyron said:
Since that book you are arguing against is 122 years old I wonder who you think is alive that you are arguing against.

I will agree that you have some ignorance and partisan hackery in spades.
Click to expand...

Thats nice...but I'm not arguing against a book. But hey, don't let that get in the way of your trolling.
 
Mac77 said:
Speaking only for myself I'm not a guilt ridden white liberal who panders to muslims even as they cut peoples heads off.

The delusional left is lucky to have clear thinking conservatives around to protect them
Click to expand...

Anybody who thinks the Confederacy was a justified or redeemable cause is the exact opposite of "clear thinking".
 
Tigerace117 said:
Anybody who thinks the Confederacy was a justified or redeemable cause is the exact opposite of "clear thinking".
Click to expand...

You could say the same about the American Revolution if the British had won and hung the Founding Fathers

Of course the South had the right to leave the Union.

But they were not strong eough to pull it off.

And I personally think the world is better off they they didn't

However I respect the great men who fought on the losing side
 
Moot said:
Thats nice...but I'm not arguing against a book. But hey, don't let that get in the way of your trolling.
Click to expand...

Uhh that was your link. A schoolbook from 1895.
 
Mac77 said:
You could say the same about the American Revolution if the British had won and hung the Founding Fathers

Of course the South had the right to leave the Union.

But they were not strong eough to pull it off.

And I personally think the world is better off they they didn't

However I respect the great men who fought on the losing side
Click to expand...

But they didn't win the American Revolution, and the founding fathers weren't fighting for slavery.

Of course they did not. Andrew Jackson put it best in that regard.

"Great men" my ass.
 
Tigerace117 said:
But they didn't win the American Revolution, and the founding fathers weren't fighting for slavery.

Of course they did not. Andrew Jackson put it best in that regard.

"Great men" my ass.
Click to expand...

If your mind is made up I wont waste my time trying to convince you other wise
 
truthatallcost said:
The story goes on to talk about a video that the terrorist made where he holds a severed head in his hands. I didn't know that kind of thing turns women on.

I guess this is an unforeseen pitfall of having women working as translators; they might fall in love with a terrorist and elope to Syria. Now I've seen it all.

170430223405-investigates-daniela-greene-denis-cuspert-split-exlarge-169.jpg
Click to expand...
I guess You haven't seen our ladies defending murderers in federal prison,then marrying them? tons of them
 
YorkshirePete said:
I guess You haven't seen our ladies defending murderers in federal prison,then marrying them? tons of them
Click to expand...

I doubt if they would win any beauty contests
 
akyron said:
Uhh that was your link. A schoolbook from 1895.
Click to expand...

Yes, it was mentioned in one of the links....but that's not what I'm arguing against. Perhaps you would've known that if you had an ounce of objectivity and didn't have your partisan blinders on...but I don't see that changing anytime soon.
 
Last edited:
Moot said:
Yes, it was mentioned in one of the links....but that's not what I'm arguing against. Perhaps you would've known that if you had an ounce of objectivity and didn't have your partisan blinders on...but I don't see that changing anytime soon.
Click to expand...

The fact is you are ranting about a 122 year old schoolbook somehow intimating that the civil war is alive and well.

AND somehow intimating that you can understand a viewpoint of southern states based on that book and a few statues.

Your entire premise is an exercise in fallacy regardless of your perspective.

That is an equivalent to "All muslims are bad because they follow the same koran."

Therefore you are RACIST!

It actually feels better when I say it that way. Now I know where you get this stuff. Logic and sense are out the window but...whatever.
 
Last edited:
truthatallcost said:
The story goes on to talk about a video that the terrorist made where he holds a severed head in his hands. I didn't know that kind of thing turns women on.

I guess this is an unforeseen pitfall of having women working as translators; they might fall in love with a terrorist and elope to Syria. Now I've seen it all.

170430223405-investigates-daniela-greene-denis-cuspert-split-exlarge-169.jpg
Click to expand...

Update (sorry for the necro mods)
Deso Dogg, ISIS' 'gangsta jihadi', killed in Syria clashes, terror watchdog says

Deso Dogg, ISIS' 'gangsta jihadi', killed in Syria clashes, terror watchdog says | Fox News

 
Moot said:
Kinda like Flynn, eh.

For someone who cares about national security you don't seem to have a problem with that moron in the WH divulging national secrets on twitter...or cherry picking classified information to use his against his opponents....or playing with the red button in the oval office like it was a toy.
Click to expand...
Or when Hillary pays Russians for info for a fake dossier, that is used to spy on the Trump campaign... authorized by criminal Democrats high-up in the DOJ and FBI.

The bell is tolling for those who turned our DOJ and FBI into The US-KGB.

It’s hit then fan... soon the nation will exposed to the stench of a corrupt FBI, DOJ, Hillary and Obamatrons.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom