• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

People reporting extraterrestrials to Trump's alien hotline

Winston

Winston

Advanced stage dementia patient pls support my run
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 24, 2017
Messages
24,673
Reaction score
24,019
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
People reporting extraterrestrial sightings to Trump's new 'criminal alien' hotline | TheHill

The administration set up the Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement (VOICE) Office on Wednesday, in accordance with President Trump’s executive order in January. The office, folded within the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency, aims to “assist victims of crimes committed by criminal aliens,” according to the Department of Homeland Security.
Click to expand...


Nice job Internet. Bravo.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I wonder how many of those folk are actually not trolling the hotline. If it's greater than zero, the number would have to be rather small. Still I wonder if it is greater than zero. To do so, one would have to first think that they had legitimately seen an extraterrestrial, and then think the hotline was setup for just such an instance.
 
Last edited:
Ikari said:
I wonder how many of those folk are actually not trolling the hotline. It's it's greater than zero, the number would have to be rather small. Still I wonder if it is greater than zero. To do so, one would have to first think that they had legitimately seen an extraterrestrial, and then think the hotline was setup for just such an instance.
Click to expand...

IMG_1052.JPG



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
It's just as likely as being attacked by a mexican
 
sanman said:
Drug cartel lords will be happy to hear your endorsement.
Click to expand...

just as soon as your side ends the war for drugs that enables those cartels, you can make that argument

you act like there's no old fashioned american gangs wreaking havoc. Nice to know that have YOUR endorsement
 
chromium said:
just as soon as your side ends the war for drugs that enables those cartels, you can make that argument
Click to expand...

How does my side support drugs? I support a wall which will help block the flow of drugs.

The side that opposes the wall and obfuscates about it, is supporting the flow of drugs.
 
sanman said:
How does my side support drugs? I support a wall which will help block the flow of drugs.
Click to expand...

yeah right, 40 pounds of weed was *catapulted* over a wall just the other day. And that is when the *american* gangs get a hold of it and wreck havoc as a partnership. Maybe we should deport americans or just build a wall to block off texas while as a precaution.

There's also something called the gulf of mexico, if you look on a map

edit: know where the drugs were sent? Arizona, where pot is still illegal
 
Last edited:
"Hello, is this 911? I'd like to report a robbery in progress. There's a bunch of what seem to be illegal aliens in flying disks, stealing all of my cows.

Hello? You still there?"
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
That's the problem with walls: there are ways to go around them.
Click to expand...

Walls don't stop people who overstay their VISA as well.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
That's the problem with walls: there are ways to go around them.
Click to expand...

it can work on a very small scale like israel-gaza, although the effect is to imprison the people of gaza, but it does keep terrorists out. Then again, they just shoot the rockets over the wall...

But on a large scale like the vast american borders, not a chance. Syria also proves that desperate people will traverse any obstacle. All it will do is cause the price of dope to go up a bit

Most of all it blows my mind that anyone can argue if drugs were legal it wouldn't kill the cartels over night
 
chromium said:
yeah right, 40 pounds of weed was *catapulted* over a wall just the other day. And that is when the *american* gangs get a hold of it and wreck havoc as a partnership. Maybe we should deport americans or just build a wall to block off texas while as a precaution.

There's also something called the gulf of mexico, if you look on a map
Click to expand...

Unitedwestand13 said:
That's the problem with walls: there are ways to go around them.
Click to expand...

Was waiting for these deflecting responses - the wall will not make it easier to bring drugs into the country. Not having the wall doesn't improve border security.

The goal of those who criticize the wall is to make sure that as little gets done as possible on border security.

Wall cannot detract from any other security measures. We don't need to wait for perfection to make improvements, like a wall.
Those who scoff at the wall as imperfect, are those who wish to delay all possible security measures in the name of perfection.
ie. "if it's not perfect, don't do it" (meaning avoid new measures as much as possible)
 
sanman said:
Was waiting for these deflecting responses - the wall will not make it easier to bring drugs into the country. Not having the wall doesn't improve border security.

The goal of those who criticize the wall is to make sure that as little gets done as possible on border security.

Wall cannot detract from any other security measures. We don't need to wait for perfection to make improvements, like a wall.
Those who scoff at the wall as imperfect, are those who wish to delay all possible security measures in the name of perfection.
ie. "if it's not perfect, don't do it" (meaning avoid new measures as much as possible)
Click to expand...

The wall is a fixed emplacement that costs money to build and maintain.

Besides, building a wall will not stop drug cartels from operating their smuggling operations by sea or by air.

Also there is the small matter of the wall possibly violating long standing treaties with Mexico

So the wall is a bad idea
 
sanman said:
Was waiting for these deflecting responses - the wall will not make it easier to bring drugs into the country. Not having the wall doesn't improve border security.

The goal of those who criticize the wall is to make sure that as little gets done as possible on border security.

Wall cannot detract from any other security measures. We don't need to wait for perfection to make improvements, like a wall.
Those who scoff at the wall as imperfect, are those who wish to delay all possible security measures in the name of perfection.
ie. "if it's not perfect, don't do it" (meaning avoid new measures as much as possible)
Click to expand...

dude tell it to the 8 republican senators who don't want the wall because it would decimate the economy of border states. Half of texas has a mexican mowing their lawn. They are FAR from all being criminals. And they aren't going back just because you build a wall

You want improvements, end the war for drugs. That will be damn effective by comparison, far less costly and far more just

If it's not perfect, find a better way before you blow $20 billion and erect a giant wall in everyone's back yard
 
chromium said:
dude tell it to the 8 republican senators who don't want the wall because it would decimate the economy of border states. Half of texas has a mexican mowing their lawn. They are FAR from all being criminals. And they aren't going back just because you build a wall

You want improvements, end the war for drugs. That will be damn effective by comparison, far less costly and far more just

If it's not perfect, find a better way before you blow $20 billion and erect a giant wall in everyone's back yard
Click to expand...

8 Republican senators aren't why you oppose the wall - you oppose it because you want to see the US demographically altered to create all kinds of new voters for your party who otherwise wouldn't exist.
 
sanman said:
8 Republican senators aren't why you oppose the wall - you oppose it because you want to see the US demographically altered to create all kinds of new voters for your party who otherwise wouldn't exist.
Click to expand...

i have never voted a democrat so try again

i do think people have an 'inalienable right' to travel the world freely though, whether it's to the US or N Korea. I spit on national borders

safety is important but i also *know* the safest route is to end the drug war
 
sanman said:
8 Republican senators aren't why you oppose the wall - you oppose it because
you want to see the US demographically altered to create all kinds of new voters for your party who otherwise wouldn't exist.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...



Come back and tell us all about it in about 50 years after massive demographic change reduces the GOP to a marginal,regional,party.

"No one can stop time and/or change."
 
sanman said:
How does my side support drugs? I support a wall which will help block the flow of drugs.

The side that opposes the wall and obfuscates about it, is supporting the flow of drugs.
Click to expand...

If you support the War on Drugs, you're in support of gov't welfare for the Cartels.

This should be screamingly obvious to any rational adult.
 
sanman said:
I support a wall which will help block the flow of drugs.
Click to expand...

1-15.jpg
 
chromium said:
i have never voted a democrat so try again

i do think people have an 'inalienable right' to travel the world freely though, whether it's to the US or N Korea. I spit on national borders

safety is important but i also *know* the safest route is to end the drug war
Click to expand...

That's like saying you have a right to enter uninvited into anyone's home at will, and that you spit private property rights

You're telling us all we need to know about your own ethics
 
sanman said:
How does my side support drugs? I support a wall which will help block the flow of drugs.

The side that opposes the wall and obfuscates about it, is supporting the flow of drugs.
Click to expand...

Your side supports a failed war on drugs, the GOP is so far behind cannabis reform they look prehistoric.
 
sanman said:
Was waiting for these deflecting responses - the wall will not make it easier to bring drugs into the country. Not having the wall doesn't improve border security.

The goal of those who criticize the wall is to make sure that as little gets done as possible on border security.

Wall cannot detract from any other security measures. We don't need to wait for perfection to make improvements, like a wall.
Those who scoff at the wall as imperfect, are those who wish to delay all possible security measures in the name of perfection.
ie. "if it's not perfect, don't do it" (meaning avoid new measures as much as possible)
Click to expand...

Where do we build the wall at the Texas border where the Rio Grande is. That would be the longest stretch. Can't put it up in the middle of the river.... Impossible. Can't put it up on the Mexican side.... Impossible unless you want to go to war against Mexico. So we put it up on our side, and cede the Rio Grande, all of it, to Mexico. Dumb move.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom